IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v77y2018icp652-660.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing Indigenous Lands in Amazonia: Securing indigenous rights and wildlife conservation through hunting management

Author

Listed:
  • Constantino, Pedro de Araujo Lima
  • Benchimol, Maíra
  • Antunes, André Pinassi

Abstract

In Amazonia, Indigenous Lands (ILs), created to guarantee both indigenous rights and the conservation of natural resources, are a major legal mechanism to ensure the ancestral and contemporary relationships of indigenous peoples to their territory. Additionally, these areas have been one of the most effective barriers to the large-scale agriculture and cattle ranching frontiers, strongly contributing to the conservation of Amazonia. Although several indigenous peoples have had their lands recognized by the Brazilian and Peruvian national governments, many demarcated lands are not able to ensure indigenous rights; in addition, there are still 951 claims for land demarcation or revision in these countries. In the context of intensive pressure to make the process of IL recognition essentially political, we propose a scientifically supported model based on source-sink hunting dynamics to improve the identification of the minimum size and shape of ILs required to guarantee indigenous rights. We used criteria based on hunting dynamics to test whether the current limits of the total IL of an indigenous people, the Huni Kuin, are able to ensure their constitutional rights and the local conservation of natural resources. We showed that to ensure sustainable hunting, the Huni Kuin ILs should be large enough to encompass each village’s hunting territory of 78.5 km2 surrounded by an undisturbed area of the same size, totaling 157 km2 per village. However, their ILs are currently too small to maintain sustainable hunting if the traditional social organization of several small villages distributed along rivers is maintained, so they fail to achieve the IL goals. We discuss three hypothetical alternatives for either maintaining or reviewing current Huni Kuin ILs; however, these alternatives are unlikely to be applicable for the Huni Kuin because they either are against the current political trends or violate indigenous rights. We thus suggest that future IL delimitation studies should consider current spatial hunting patterns in order to improve the delimitation and territorial management of IL in Amazonia, by identifying the ideal shape and size of hunting territories and applying a source-sink model likely to ensure sustainable hunting activities in the long term.

Suggested Citation

  • Constantino, Pedro de Araujo Lima & Benchimol, Maíra & Antunes, André Pinassi, 2018. "Designing Indigenous Lands in Amazonia: Securing indigenous rights and wildlife conservation through hunting management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 652-660.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:77:y:2018:i:c:p:652-660
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837717316113
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anders H. Sirén & Juan-Camilo Cardenas & Peter Hambäck & Kalle Parvinen, 2013. "Distance Friction and the Cost of Hunting in Tropical Forest," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 89(3), pages 558-574.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mueller, Bernardo, 2022. "Property rights and violence in indigenous land in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    2. Antunes, André Pinassi & Rebêlo, George Henrique & Pezzuti, Juarez Carlos Brito & Vieira, Marina Albuquerque Regina de Mattos & Constantino, Pedro de Araujo Lima & Campos-Silva, João Vitor & Fonseca, , 2019. "A conspiracy of silence: Subsistence hunting rights in the Brazilian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1-11.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sirén, Anders & Parvinen, Kalle, 2015. "A spatial bioeconomic model of the harvest of wild plants and animals," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 201-210.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:77:y:2018:i:c:p:652-660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.