IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v134y2023ics0264837723003939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Action-oriented planning methods as a tool for improving regional governance in Switzerland: Evidence from the Sisslerfeld area

Author

Listed:
  • Papamichail, Theodora
  • Perić, Ana

Abstract

Faced with challenges such as rapid transformation of existing settlements, reorganisation of mobility patterns, and climate change mitigation management, the governance of spatial development in Switzerland demands institutional and procedural innovations, particularly noticeable at the regional scale. Although cantons, the middle-governmental tier between the federal and communal authorities (municipalities), play a coordinating role supported by numerous formal and informal planning instruments, the small size of the institutional territory, coupled with administrative decentralisation of the country and autonomy of the lowest administrative levels, often challenges a multi-governmental and multi-sectorial approach to regional spatial development. Against the concepts of regional governance, regional planning and the action-oriented planning, and using the mixed-method research approach (focusing on documentary analysis and ethnographic methods), the article critically assesses a planning method – test planning – applied in the process of creating a development vision of Sisslerfeld, the largest land reserve in the Swiss canton of Aargau. Research results highlight the potential and limitations of informal collaborative procedures and elucidate the approaches of critical actors in an effort to achieve joint institutional action.

Suggested Citation

  • Papamichail, Theodora & Perić, Ana, 2023. "Action-oriented planning methods as a tool for improving regional governance in Switzerland: Evidence from the Sisslerfeld area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:134:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723003939
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723003939
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Machiels & Tine Compernolle & Tom Coppens, 2021. "Explaining Uncertainty Avoidance in Megaprojects: Resource Constraints, Strategic Behaviour, or Institutions?," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 537-555, August.
    2. John Harrison & Daniel Galland & Mark Tewdwr-Jones, 2021. "Whither regional planning?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 1-5, January.
    3. Erblin Berisha & Giancarlo Cotella & Umberto Janin Rivolin & Alys Solly, 2021. "Spatial governance and planning systems in the public control of spatial development: a European typology," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 181-200, January.
    4. Nadine Kiessling & Marco Pütz, 2020. "Assessing the regional governance capacities of spatial planning: the case of the canton of Zurich," Regional Studies, Regional Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 183-205, January.
    5. John Harrison & Daniel Galland & Mark Tewdwr-Jones, 2021. "Regional planning is dead: long live planning regional futures," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 6-18, January.
    6. Jean-David Gerber, 2016. "The managerial turn and municipal land-use planning in Switzerland – evidence from practice," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 192-209, April.
    7. Lukas Smas & Peter Schmitt, 2021. "Positioning regional planning across Europe," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 778-790, May.
    8. Gerber, Jean-David & Debrunner, Gabriela, 2022. "Planning with power. Implementing urban densification policies in Zurich, Switzerland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    9. Sabine Weck & Ali Madanipour & Peter Schmitt, 2022. "Place-based development and spatial justice," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 791-806, May.
    10. Eva Purkarthofer & Alois Humer & Raine Mäntysalo, 2021. "Regional planning: an arena of interests, institutions and relations," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 773-777, May.
    11. John Friedmann, 2019. "Thinking about complexity and planning," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 13-22, January.
    12. Reto Steiner, 2003. "The causes, spread and effects of intermunicipal cooperation and municipal mergers in Switzerland," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 551-571, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tavares Antonio F., 2018. "Municipal amalgamations and their effects: a literature review," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 22(1), pages 5-15, March.
    2. Ratka ÄŒolić & Ä orÄ‘e Milić & Jasna Petrić & NataÅ¡a ÄŒolić, 2022. "Institutional capacity development within the national urban policy formation process – Participants’ views," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 69-89, February.
    3. Blaeschke, Frédéric & Haug, Peter, 2014. "Does Intermunicipal Cooperation Increase Efficiency? Evidence from the Hessian Wastewater Sector," IWH Discussion Papers 11/2014, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    4. Vera Götze & Mathias Jehling, 2023. "Comparing types and patterns: A context-oriented approach to densification in Switzerland and the Netherlands," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(6), pages 1645-1659, July.
    5. NELLES Jennifer, 2010. "All for One? The Dynamic of Intermunicipal Cooperation in Regional Marketing Partnerships," LISER Working Paper Series 2010-18, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    6. Hans Pitlik & Klaus Wirth & Barbara Lehner, 2010. "Gemeindestruktur und Gemeindekooperation," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 41359, April.
    7. Debrunner, Gabriela & Kaufmann, David, 2023. "Land valuation in densifying cities: The negotiation process between institutional landowners and municipal planning authorities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    8. Daniela Cristofoli & Josip Markovic & Marco Meneguzzo, 2014. "Governance, management and performance in public networks: How to be successful in shared-governance networks," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(1), pages 77-93, February.
    9. Banaszewska, Monika & Bischoff, Ivo & Bode, Eva & Chodakowska, Aneta, 2022. "Does inter-municipal cooperation help improve local economic performance? – Evidence from Poland," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    10. Stefano Manestra & Giovanna Messina & Anna Peta, 2018. "Is there strength in unity? Some preliminary evidence on inter-municipal cooperation in Italy," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 452, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    11. Holtslag-Broekhof, Sanne, 2018. "Urban land readjustment: Necessary for effective urban renewal? Analysing the Dutch quest for new legislation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 821-828.
    12. Lothar Grall, 2016. "Geography, Parental Investment, and Comparative Economic Development," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201646, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    13. Clemens de Olde & Stijn Oosterlynck, 2021. "Taking Implementation Seriously in the Evaluation of Urban Growth Management Strategies: “Safeguarding the Future” of the Antwerp City-Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    14. Lothar Grall & Juergen Meckl, 2016. "Natural Selection, Technological Progress, and the Origin of Human Longevity," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201645, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    15. Poklewski-Koziełł, Damian & Dudzic-Gyurkovich, Karolina & Duarte, Carlos Marmolejo, 2023. "Investigating urban form, and walkability measures in the new developments. The case study of Garnizon in Gdansk," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    16. Julio C. Zambrano-Gutiérrez & Claudia N. Avellaneda, 2023. "Inter-municipal vs. Inter-governmental Cooperation: Their Impact on International Aid," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 861-881, September.
    17. Julie Pollard, 2023. "The political conditions of the rise of real-estate developers in French housing policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(2), pages 274-291, March.
    18. Raco, Mike & Ward, Callum & Brill, Frances & Sanderson, Danielle & Freire-Trigo, Sonia & Ferm, Jess & Hamiduddin, Iqbal & Livingstone, Nicola, 2022. "Towards a virtual statecraft: housing targets and the governance of urban housing markets," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114315, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Anna Francesca Pattaro & Marco Ranuzzini & Luca Bonacini, 2019. "Inter-municipal cooperation as a solution for public services delivery? The case of Unioni di Comuni in Emilia-Romagna Region," Department of Economics 0144, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    20. Christian Bergholz & Ivo Bischoff, 2019. "Citizens’ support for inter-municipal cooperation: evidence from a survey in the German state of Hesse," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(12), pages 1268-1283, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:134:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723003939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.