IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v126y2023ics0264837723000108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to effective property tax reform in Nigeria: Implementation of the land use charge in Enugu state

Author

Listed:
  • Nnamani, Obinna Collins
  • Ifeanacho, Kenechi Peter
  • Onyekwelu, Ezinne Ifeoma
  • Ogbuefi, Paul Chibueze

Abstract

The principal objective of this research is to explore the barriers to the effective implementation of the centralised property tax reform programme in Enugu state, Nigeria. This study adopts a qualitative research approach using primary and secondary information. Key stakeholders comprising the estate surveyors and valuers/property managers, a senior staff member of the Enugu state Board of Internal Revenue and members of the land use charge tribunal were selected for in-depth semi-structured interview. Findings show that policy design, political/governance, and technical are the three major barriers to the implementation of the land use charge. Based on these findings, this study recommends the decentralisation of the land use charge administration system; adoption of capital basis for property assessment; massive public sensitisation; demonstration of political will by the property-owning elites; adoption of the collection-led approach in the implementation of the property tax reform policy; deploying ICT such as geo-referencing software in property information gathering and computer-aided mass appraisal method (CAMA) in the valuation of properties. This research highlights how not to design and implement property tax reform in a developing economic context for enhanced property tax revenue performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Nnamani, Obinna Collins & Ifeanacho, Kenechi Peter & Onyekwelu, Ezinne Ifeoma & Ogbuefi, Paul Chibueze, 2023. "Barriers to effective property tax reform in Nigeria: Implementation of the land use charge in Enugu state," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:126:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723000108
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723000108
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106544?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johan Fourie, 2006. "Economic Infrastructure: A Review Of Definitions, Theory And Empirics," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 74(3), pages 530-556, September.
    2. Jibao, Samuel S. & Prichard, Wilson, 2015. "The Political Economy of Property Tax in Africa: Explaining Reform Outcomes in Sierra Leone," Working Papers 13721, Institute of Development Studies, International Centre for Tax and Development.
    3. repec:eme:ijlma0:17542431111119405 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Odd-Helge Fjeldstad & Kari Heggstad, 2012. "Local government revenue mobilisation in Anglophone Africa," CMI Working Papers 6, CMI (Chr. Michelsen Institute), Bergen, Norway.
    5. Nizar Mohammad Alsharari, 2019. "A comparative analysis of taxation and revenue trends in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region," Pacific Accounting Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(4), pages 646-671, November.
    6. Enid Slack & Richard M Bird, 2014. "The Political Economy of Property Tax Reform," OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism 18, OECD Publishing.
    7. Fjeldstad, Odd-Helge & Ali, Merima & Katera, Lucas, 2019. "Policy Implementation Under Stress: Central-Local Government Relations in Property Tax Administration in Tanzania," Working Papers 14480, Institute of Development Studies, International Centre for Tax and Development.
    8. Rosengard, Jay K., 2012. "The Tax Everyone Loves to Hate: Principle of Property Tax Reform," Scholarly Articles 9642636, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    9. Roy Kelly, 2004. "Property Tax Reform in Indonesia: Emerging Challenges from Decentralisation," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 71-90, June.
    10. Samuel Jibao & Wilson Prichard, 2016. "Rebuilding Local Government Finances After Conflict: Lessons from a Property Tax Reform Programme in Post-Conflict Sierra Leone," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(12), pages 1759-1775, December.
    11. Roy Kelly, 1992. "IMPLEMENTING PROPERTY TAX REFORM IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: Lessons from the Property Tax in Indonesia1," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(2), pages 193-208, July.
    12. Jibao, Samuel & Prichard, Wilson, 2016. "Rebuilding Local Government Finances After Conflict: Lessons from a Property Tax Reform Programme in Post-Conflict Sierra Leone," Working Papers 13739, Institute of Development Studies, International Centre for Tax and Development.
    13. repec:eme:par000:par-12-2018-0114 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriella Y. Carolini, 2021. "Aid’s urban footprint and its implications for local inequality and governance," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(2), pages 389-409, March.
    2. Awasthi, Rajul & Nagarajan, Mohan & Deininger, Klaus W., 2021. "Property taxation in India: Issues impacting revenue performance and suggestions for reform," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    3. Sung-Hoon Kang & Bong-Joon Kim, 2022. "Designing a Valuation System for Property Tax: The Case of Zanzibar, Tanzania," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-12, June.
    4. Piracha, Mujtaba & Moore, Mick, 2016. "Revenue-Maximising or Revenue-Sacrificing Government? Property Tax in Pakistan," Working Papers 14000, Institute of Development Studies, International Centre for Tax and Development.
    5. Mujtaba Piracha & Mick Moore, 2016. "Revenue-Maximising or Revenue-Sacrificing Government? Property Tax in Pakistan," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(12), pages 1776-1790, December.
    6. Ahmad, Ehtisham & Brosio, Giorgio & Jiménez, Juan Pablo, 2019. "Options for retooling property taxation in Latin America," Macroeconomía del Desarrollo 45021, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    7. Weigel, Jonathan, 2020. "The participation dividend of taxation: how citizens in Congo engage more with the state when it tries to tax them," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 104561, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Vanessa van den Boogaard & Rachel Beach, 2023. "Tax and governance in rural areas: The implications of inefficient tax collection," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(7), pages 1892-1912, October.
    9. Tahiru, Fati & Agbesi, Samuel, 2019. "Driver and Barriers of ICT Adoption in Revenue Collection in Ghana: A Case of Accra Metropolitan Assembly," 30th European Regional ITS Conference, Helsinki 2019 205216, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    10. John S. Hill & Myung-Su Chae & Jinseo Park, 2012. "The Effects of Geography and Infrastructure on Economic Development and International Business Involvement," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 4(2), pages 91-113, December.
    11. Zhang, Yijia & Cheng, Lu, 2023. "The role of transport infrastructure in economic growth: Empirical evidence in the UK," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 223-233.
    12. Jibao, Samuel & Prichard, Wilson, 2016. "Rebuilding Local Government Finances After Conflict: Lessons from a Property Tax Reform Programme in Post-Conflict Sierra Leone," Working Papers 13739, Institute of Development Studies, International Centre for Tax and Development.
    13. Engelmann, Tobias & von Haldenwang, Christian & Sahler, Gregor & Elfert, Alice & Germain, Samuel & Stanzel Ferreira, Amelie, 2015. "The devolution of the land and building tax in Indonesia," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 89, number 89.
    14. Massimiliano Ferraresi & Leonzio Rizzo, 2015. "L?impatto della contabilità euro-compatibile in un?auspicabile evoluzione del patto di stabilità interno," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(3), pages 31-57.
    15. Kumhof, Michael & Tideman, Nicolaus & Hudson, Michael & Goodhart, Charles, 2021. "Post-Corona Balanced-Budget Super-Stimulus: The Case for Shifting Taxes onto Land," CEPR Discussion Papers 16652, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Travers Barclay Child & Elena Nikolova, 2017. "War and Social Attitudes: Revisiting Consensus Views," HiCN Working Papers 258, Households in Conflict Network.
    17. Hayot Berk Saydaliev & Lee Chin, 2023. "The necessity of social infrastructure for enhancing educational attainment: evidence from high remittance recipient LMICs," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1823-1847, June.
    18. Masaki, Takaaki, 2018. "The impact of intergovernmental transfers on local revenue generation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 173-186.
    19. Johan Fourie, 2008. "A note on infrastructure quality in South Africa," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 481-494.
    20. Edoardo Di Porto & Enrica Maria Martino & Henry Ohlsson, 2021. "Avoiding taxes by transfers within the family," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 28(1), pages 1-23, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:126:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723000108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.