IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v73y2021ics0957178721001326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring customer satisfaction in Great Britain's retail energy sector Part I: The comparative use of Trustpilot online reviews in four sectors

Author

Listed:
  • Littlechild, Stephen

Abstract

Online consumer reviews are now widely used and influential. Trustpilot is a relatively new but rapidly growing consumer review and rating website where companies can be active in inviting and responding to reviews. It is most used by retail energy suppliers and mobile phone providers and their customers and least used by supermarkets and banks. Company usage increased from 2019 to 2020, especially in mobiles. Large incumbent companies made least use of Trustpilot. Companies advising customers on energy suppliers are active users and score highly. Charitable and regulatory bodies are little reviewed, are inactive users and have very low scores.

Suggested Citation

  • Littlechild, Stephen, 2021. "Exploring customer satisfaction in Great Britain's retail energy sector Part I: The comparative use of Trustpilot online reviews in four sectors," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:73:y:2021:i:c:s0957178721001326
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2021.101298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178721001326
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2021.101298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Littlechild, Stephen, 2021. "Exploring customer satisfaction in Great Britain's retail energy sector part II: The increasing use of Trustpilot online reviews," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Xinxin Li & Lorin M. Hitt, 2008. "Self-Selection and Information Role of Online Product Reviews," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 456-474, December.
    3. Dellarocas, Chrysanthos, 2003. "The Digitization of Word-of-mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms," Working papers 4296-03, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    4. Chrysanthos Dellarocas, 2003. "The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(10), pages 1407-1424, October.
    5. Littlechild, Stephen, 2021. "Exploring customer satisfaction in Great Britain's retail energy sector part III: A proposed Overall Customer Satisfaction score," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Littlechild, Stephen, 2021. "Exploring customer satisfaction in Great Britain's retail energy sector part II: The increasing use of Trustpilot online reviews," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Littlechild, Stephen, 2021. "Exploring customer satisfaction in Great Britain's retail energy sector part III: A proposed Overall Customer Satisfaction score," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paulo B. Goes & Mingfeng Lin & Ching-man Au Yeung, 2014. "“Popularity Effect” in User-Generated Content: Evidence from Online Product Reviews," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 222-238, June.
    2. Apostolos Filippas & John Horton & Joseph M. Golden, 2017. "Reputation in the Long-Run," CESifo Working Paper Series 6750, CESifo.
    3. Floyd, Kristopher & Freling, Ryan & Alhoqail, Saad & Cho, Hyun Young & Freling, Traci, 2014. "How Online Product Reviews Affect Retail Sales: A Meta-analysis," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 217-232.
    4. Rahat Ullah & Wonjoon Kim & Naveen C. Amblee & Hyunjong Lee & Alice Oh, 2014. "Do Emotions Matter? Exploring The Distribution Of Emotions In Online Product Reviews," Working papers 156, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    5. Juan Feng & Xin Li & Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang, 2019. "Online Product Reviews-Triggered Dynamic Pricing: Theory and Evidence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1107-1123, December.
    6. Jürgen Neumann & Dominik Gutt & Dennis Kundisch, 2018. "The Traveling Reviewer Problem – Exploring the Relationship between Offline Locations and Online Rating Behavior," Working Papers Dissertations 44, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    7. King, Robert Allen & Racherla, Pradeep & Bush, Victoria D., 2014. "What We Know and Don't Know About Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 167-183.
    8. Mukta Srivastava & Sreeram Sivaramakrishnan & Gordhan K. Saini, 2021. "The Relationship Between Electronic Word-of-Mouth and Consumer Engagement: An Exploratory Study," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 10(1), pages 66-81, January.
    9. Taeuscher, Karl, 2019. "Reputation and new venture performance in online markets: The moderating role of market crowding," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(6).
    10. Colmekcioglu, Nazan & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea & Okumus, Fevzi, 2022. "Generation, susceptibility, and response regarding negativity: An in-depth analysis on negative online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 235-250.
    11. Schindler, Diana & Decker, Reinhold, 2013. "Some remarks on the internal consistency of online consumer reviews," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 221-227.
    12. Zhen Li & Fangzhou Li & Jing Xiao & Zhi Yang, 2020. "Topic Features in Negative Customer Reviews: Evidence Based on Text Data Mining," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 19-40, April.
    13. Michael Scholz & Verena Dorner, 2013. "The Recipe for the Perfect Review?," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 5(3), pages 141-151, June.
    14. Daniel Kaimann & Joe Cox, 2014. "The Interaction of Signals: A Fuzzy set Analysis of the Video Game Industry," Working Papers Dissertations 13, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    15. Stephen Littlechild, 2020. "Online reviews and customer satisfaction: The use of Trustpilot by UK retail energy suppliers and three other sectors," Working Papers EPRG2025, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    16. Jörg Claussen & Tobias Kretschmer & Philip Mayrhofer, 2013. "The Effects of Rewarding User Engagement: The Case of Facebook Apps," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 186-200, March.
    17. Tao Lu & May Yuan & Chong (Alex) Wang & Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang, 2022. "Histogram Distortion Bias in Consumer Choices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(12), pages 8963-8978, December.
    18. Nachiketa Sahoo & Chrysanthos Dellarocas & Shuba Srinivasan, 2018. "The Impact of Online Product Reviews on Product Returns," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 723-738, September.
    19. Heeseung Andrew Lee & Angela Aerry Choi & Tianshu Sun & Wonseok Oh, 2021. "Reviewing Before Reading? An Empirical Investigation of Book-Consumption Patterns and Their Effects on Reviews and Sales," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1368-1389, December.
    20. Bin Gu & Jaehong Park & Prabhudev Konana, 2012. "Research Note ---The Impact of External Word-of-Mouth Sources on Retailer Sales of High-Involvement Products," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 182-196, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Online reviews; Customer feedback; Trustpilot;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality
    • L84 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Personal, Professional, and Business Services
    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:73:y:2021:i:c:s0957178721001326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.