IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jouret/v97y2021i3p459-476.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influencing Consumer Responses to Highly Aesthetic Products: The Role of Mindsets

Author

Listed:
  • Lin, Ying-Ching
  • Chang, Chiu-Chi Angela

Abstract

Companies often use aesthetics or salient visual attributes to differentiate their products from those of their competitors and to appeal to customers. However, consumers may make unfavorable inferences about highly aesthetic products due to concerns about the products’ functionality. To address the issue of how retailers can most effectively engage in the deployment and promotion of product aesthetics, the present research proposes that consumers will respond more favorably (i.e., enhanced choice of product, enhanced product and advertisement evaluations, and a heightened willingness to pay) to a highly aesthetic product when they are in an abstract, rather than a concrete, mindset. Five studies using multiple product categories and applying various mindset manipulations provide convergent evidence to support the proposed hypothesis. The findings hold true for utilitarian, but not hedonic, products, and the focus of attention on product functionality accounts for the results. With the insight that the mindset consumers are in is critical in determining their response to highly aesthetics products, retailers can capitalize on selected situations in which to promote product aesthetics.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin, Ying-Ching & Chang, Chiu-Chi Angela, 2021. "Influencing Consumer Responses to Highly Aesthetic Products: The Role of Mindsets," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 459-476.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jouret:v:97:y:2021:i:3:p:459-476
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2020.10.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435920300671
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretai.2020.10.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wendy Liu, 2008. "Focusing on Desirability: The Effect of Decision Interruption and Suspension on Preferences," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(4), pages 640-652, August.
    2. Claudia Townsend & Darren DahlEditor & Page MoreauAssociate Editor, 2017. "The Price of Beauty: Differential Effects of Design Elements with and without Cost Implications in Nonprofit Donor Solicitations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 794-815.
    3. Freeman Wu & Adriana Samper & Andrea C. Morales & Gavan J. Fitzsimons, 2017. "It’s Too Pretty to Use! When and How Enhanced Product Aesthetics Discourage Usage and Lower Consumption Enjoyment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(3), pages 651-672.
    4. Rebecca W. Hamilton & Debora Viana Thompson, 2007. "Is There a Substitute for Direct Experience? Comparing Consumers' Preferences after Direct and Indirect Product Experiences," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(4), pages 546-555, June.
    5. Cammy Crolic & Yanmei Zheng & JoAndrea Hoegg & Joseph W. Alba, 2019. "The Influence of Product Aesthetics on Consumer Inference Making," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(4), pages 398-408.
    6. Anneleen Van Kerckhove & Maggie Geuens & Iris Vermeir, 2015. "The Floor Is Nearer than the Sky: How Looking Up or Down Affects Construal Level," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(6), pages 1358-1371.
    7. Das, Gopal & Mukherjee, Amaradri & Smith, Ronn J., 2018. "The Perfect Fit: The Moderating Role of Selling Cues on Hedonic and Utilitarian Product Types," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 203-216.
    8. Veryzer, Robert W, Jr & Hutchinson, J Wesley, 1998. "The Influence of Unity and Prototypicality on Aesthetic Responses to New Product Designs," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(4), pages 374-394, March.
    9. Bloch, Peter H & Brunel, Frederic F & Arnold, Todd J, 2003. "Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(4), pages 551-565, March.
    10. Ann Kronrod & Shai Danziger, 2013. ""Wii Will Rock You!" The Use and Effect of Figurative Language in Consumer Reviews of Hedonic and Utilitarian Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(4), pages 726-739.
    11. Gergana Y. Nenkov & Maura L. Scott, 2014. ""So Cute I Could Eat It Up": Priming Effects of Cute Products on Indulgent Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(2), pages 326-341.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xie, Shengcheng & Wei, Haiying & Liu, Fu, 2023. "Is beauty always good? Effects of visual presentation of Influencer’s aesthetic labor on brand purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacob Suher & Courtney Szocs & Koert Ittersum, 2021. "When imperfect is preferred: the differential effect of aesthetic imperfections on choice of processed and unprocessed foods," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 903-924, September.
    2. Schnurr, Benedikt & Wetzels, Martin, 2020. "The conditional enjoyment-enhancing effect of shipping box aesthetics," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    3. Ludovica Cesareo & Claudia Townsend & Eugene Pavlov, 2023. "Hideous but worth it: Distinctive ugliness as a signal of luxury," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 636-657, May.
    4. Claudia Townsend & Darren DahlEditor & Page MoreauAssociate Editor, 2017. "The Price of Beauty: Differential Effects of Design Elements with and without Cost Implications in Nonprofit Donor Solicitations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 794-815.
    5. Cappetta, Rossella & Cillo, Paola & Ponti, Anna, 2006. "Convergent designs in fine fashion: An evolutionary model for stylistic innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 1273-1290, November.
    6. Li, You & Chang, Yaping & Liang, Zhehao, 2022. "Attracting more meaningful interactions: The impact of question and product types on comments on social media advertisings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 89-101.
    7. Orth, Ulrich R. & Malkewitz, Keven, 2012. "The Accuracy of Design-based Judgments: A Constructivist Approach," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 421-436.
    8. Freeman Wu & Adriana Samper & Andrea C. Morales & Gavan J. Fitzsimons, 2017. "It’s Too Pretty to Use! When and How Enhanced Product Aesthetics Discourage Usage and Lower Consumption Enjoyment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(3), pages 651-672.
    9. Das, Gopal & Wiener, Hillary J.D. & Kareklas, Ioannis, 2019. "To emoji or not to emoji? Examining the influence of emoji on consumer reactions to advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 147-156.
    10. Murray, John & Elms, Jonathan & Teller, Christoph, 2017. "Examining the role of store design on consumers’ cross-sectional perceptions of retail brand loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 147-156.
    11. Hammad Bin Azam Hashmi & Chengli Shu & Syed Waqar Haider & Adeel Khalid & Yasin Munir, 2021. "Bridging the Gap Between Product Design and Customer Engagement: Role of Self-Determined Needs Satisfaction," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    12. Grinstein, Amir & Hagtvedt, Henrik & Kronrod, Ann, 2019. "Aesthetically (dis)pleasing visuals: A dual pathway to empathy and prosocial behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 83-99.
    13. Dennis, Charles & Joško Brakus, J. & Gupta, Suraksha & Alamanos, Eleftherios, 2014. "The effect of digital signage on shoppers' behavior: The role of the evoked experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2250-2257.
    14. Benedikt Schnurr & Alexandra Brunner-Sperdin & Nicola E. Stokburger-Sauer, 2017. "The effect of context attractiveness on product attractiveness and product quality: the moderating role of product familiarity," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 241-253, June.
    15. Giese, Joan L. & Malkewitz, Keven & Orth, Ulrich R. & Henderson, Pamela W., 2014. "Advancing the aesthetic middle principle: Trade-offs in design attractiveness and strength," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 1154-1161.
    16. Wang, Lili & You, Yanfen & Yang, Chun-Ming, 2020. "Restrained by resources: The effect of scarcity cues and childhood socioeconomic status (SES) on consumer preference for feasibility," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 557-571.
    17. repec:oup:jconrs:v:49:y:2023:i:5:p:786-810. is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Kumar, Minu & Noble, Charles H., 2016. "Beyond form and function: Why do consumers value product design?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 613-620.
    19. Cornelius, Britta & Natter, Martin & Faure, Corinne, 2010. "How storefront displays influence retail store image," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 143-151.
    20. Septianto, Felix & Kemper, Joya A. & Choi, Jinyoung (Jane), 2020. "The power of beauty? The interactive effects of awe and online reviews on purchase intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    21. Yaniv Shani & Gil Appel & Shai Danziger & Ron Shachar, 2020. "When and Why Consumers “Accidentally” Endanger Their Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5757-5782, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jouret:v:97:y:2021:i:3:p:459-476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.