IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jotrge/v99y2022ics0966692322000035.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated urban transport infrastructure development: The role of digital social geo-communication in Hamburg's TEN-T improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Kotzebue, Julia R.

Abstract

The European Union's (EU) Trans-European transport network (TEN-T) policy transport policy strives for an integrated and sustainable transport development. The process can be regarded as an ongoing spatial governance process rather than a linear transport planning and project implementation. Transport developers increasingly regard information and communication technologies (ICT) as supportive in these collaborative processes and government use Public Participatory Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS). Many contextual factors, institutional and technological conditions are influencing the usage and results of the tools, there is still the need to understand their role in the spatial governance processes. Therefore, exemplified by Hamburg's TEN-T green corridor project, the following question will be investigated in the paper: how did the public and governmental actors interact when utilising (PPGIS) in Hamburg's (TEN-T) green corridor project? By the means of MAXQDA, a qualitative and mixed data analysis tool the contributions of the participants from the online participation, the consultant report that summarised the contribution and government's response been analysed (GovHam, 2020a). Furthermore, a theoretical spatial governance framework had been suggested that guided the analysis. The study shows that the selective process by authorities and consulting institutions decreases the potentials of (PPGIS) to create a deliberate and transparent discussion. Hence, the results confirm other studies, showing that the social geo- communication tools are mainly used to inform participants rather than engaging reflective learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Kotzebue, Julia R., 2022. "Integrated urban transport infrastructure development: The role of digital social geo-communication in Hamburg's TEN-T improvement," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:99:y:2022:i:c:s0966692322000035
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692322000035
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103280?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Huey-Tsyh & Rossi, Peter H., 1989. "Issues in the theory-driven perspective," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 299-306, January.
    2. Booth, Chris & Richardson, Tim, 2001. "Placing the public in integrated transport planning," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 141-149, April.
    3. Enrico Gualini, 2006. "The rescaling of governance in Europe: New spatial and institutional rationales," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(7), pages 881-904, August.
    4. Diego Álvarez Sánchez & David Pardo Gimilio & Jorge Isnardo Altamirano, 2015. "Crowdsourcing: A New Way to Citizen Empowerment," Springer Books, in: Fernando J. Garrigos-Simon & Ignacio Gil-Pechuán & Sofia Estelles-Miguel (ed.), Advances in Crowdsourcing, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 73-86, Springer.
    5. Gertz, Carsten & Holz-Rau, Christian, 2020. "Ziele, Strategien und Maßnahmen einer integrierten Verkehrsplanung - Planungsverständnis des Arbeitskreises," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Reutter, Ulrike & Holz-Rau, Christian & Albrecht, Janna & Hülz, Martina (ed.), Wechselwirkungen von Mobilität und Raumentwicklung im Kontext gesellschaftlichen Wandels, volume 14, pages 18-31, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    6. Jesse Heley, 2013. "Soft Spaces, Fuzzy Boundaries and Spatial Governance in Post-devolution Wales," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1325-1348, July.
    7. Julia R. Kotzebue, 2016. "The EU integrated urban development policy: managing complex processes in dynamic places," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 1098-1117, June.
    8. Ian Babelon & Alexander Ståhle & Berit Balfors, 2017. "Toward Cyborg PPGIS: exploring socio-technical requirements for the use of web-based PPGIS in two municipal planning cases, Stockholm region, Sweden," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(8), pages 1366-1390, August.
    9. Araz Taeihagh, 2017. "Crowdsourcing: a new tool for policy-making?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(4), pages 629-647, December.
    10. Margit Osterloh & Bruno Frey & Jetta Frost, 2001. "Managing Motivation, Organization and Governance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 5(3), pages 231-239, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kotzebue, Julia R. & Weissenbacher, Manfred, 2020. "The EU's Clean Energy strategy for islands: A policy perspective on Malta's spatial governance in energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    2. Thaler, Thomas & Löschner, Lukas & Hartmann, Thomas, 2017. "The introduction of catchment-wide co-operations: Scalar reconstructions and transformation in Austria in flood risk management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 563-573.
    3. David L. Brown & Mark Shucksmith, 2017. "Reconsidering Territorial Governance to Account for Enhanced Rural-Urban Interdependence in America," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 672(1), pages 282-301, July.
    4. Phil Allmendinger & Tobias Chilla & Franziska Sielker, 2014. "Europeanizing Territoriality—Towards Soft Spaces?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(11), pages 2703-2717, November.
    5. Xiaobo Su, 2013. "From Frontier to Bridgehead: Cross-border Regions and the Experience of Yunnan, China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1213-1232, July.
    6. Antoine Grandclement & Guilhem Boulay, 2021. "From The Uneven De-Diversification Of Local Financial Resources To Planning Policies: The Residentialization Hypothesis," Post-Print halshs-03322259, HAL.
    7. Auziņš Armands & Viesturs Jānis, 2017. "A Values-Led Planning Approach for Sustainable Land Use and Development," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 5(1), pages 275-286, November.
    8. Luciana Cingolani & Tim Hildebrandt, 2022. "Incentive Structures for the Adoption of Crowdsourcing in Public Policy: A Bureaucratic Politics Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Pallagst, Karina & Dörrenbächer, H. Peter & Weith, Thomas, 2022. "Theories of cross-border cooperation: Explanatory approaches from European integration, regionalism and governance," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Pallagst, Karina & Hartz, Andrea & Caesar, Beate (ed.), Border Futures - Zukunft Grenze - Avenir Frontière: The future viability of cross-border cooperation, volume 33, pages 33-45, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    10. Pashchenko Yana & Ye Chengang & Zhu Yue, 2022. "Organizational Ambidexterity and Crowdsourcing Through the Lens of Open Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 8(1), pages 95-111.
    11. Diana Larisa Tampu, 2015. "Human motivation and corporate governance," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 4(2), pages 177-193.
    12. Morrow, Nathan & Nkwake, Apollo M., 2016. "Assumption-aware tools and agency; an interrogation of the primary artifacts of the program evaluation and design profession in working with complex evaluands and complex contexts," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 141-153.
    13. Certomà, Chiara & Corsini, Filippo & Frey, Marco, 2020. "Hyperconnected, receptive and do-it-yourself city. An investigation into the European “imaginary” of crowdsourcing for urban governance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    14. Marletto, Gerardo & Mameli, Francesca, 2012. "A participative procedure to select indicators of policies for sustainable urban mobility. Outcomes of a national test," MPRA Paper 36433, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Timothy Dixon & David Adams, 2008. "Housing Supply and Brownfield Regeneration in a post-Barker World: Is There Enough Brownfield Land in England and Scotland?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(1), pages 115-139, January.
    16. Enrico Gualini & Carola Fricke, 2019. "‘Who governs’ Berlin’s metropolitan region? The strategic-relational construction of metropolitan scale in Berlin–Brandenburg’s economic development policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(1), pages 59-80, February.
    17. Benson, Paul R. & Fisher, Gene A. & Diana, Augusto & Simon, Lorna & Gamache, Gail & Tessler, Richard C. & McDermeit, Melissa, 1996. "A state network of family support services: The massachusetts family support demonstration project," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 27-39, February.
    18. Erik Glaas & Mattias Hjerpe & Martin Karlson & Tina-Simone Neset, 2020. "Visualization for Citizen Participation: User Perceptions on a Mainstreamed Online Participatory Tool and Its Usefulness for Climate Change Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Antoine Grandclement & Guilhem Boulay, 2021. "From the uneven de-diversification of local financial resources to planning policies: The residentialization hypothesis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1454-1472, September.
    20. Giacomo Degli Antoni, 2013. "Workers' propensity to cooperate with colleagues and the general population: a comparison based on a field experiment," Econometica Working Papers wp50, Econometica.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:99:y:2022:i:c:s0966692322000035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.