IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jotrge/v94y2021ics0966692321001630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the roles of rail stations: Insights from network approaches in the London metropolitan area

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yuerong
  • Marshall, Stephen
  • Manley, Ed

Abstract

In strategic transport planning, rail stations play different roles at different scales, particularly in large cities and metropolitan regions, where movement structure shows polycentric patterns. However, there is a general lack of evidence-based studies investigating the relative network roles of rail stations. Therefore, this paper aims to explore rail stations' roles within and beyond metropolitan communities in London. Drawing on the Transport for London's newly released NUMBAT passenger origin-destination data, we unravel the travel structure and identify the stations' roles through network methods, community detection and Z-P scores. Our research has three results: First, London's passenger movement network can be subdivided into seven communities. The majority of stations within the same communities are geographically localised with few exceptions. Second, stations play distinct roles in handling the patterns of movement at different scales. Typically, there exists a set of stations that are significant for connecting between metropolitan communities, because the disruption of those stations will have a greater impact on overall network efficiency and affect a larger and more diverse group of passengers. Third, a classification of rail stations is developed based on stations' commitment at two scales. This classification allows planners to have a finer level of understanding of the network role of the stations and thus develop and adjust tailored (re)development strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yuerong & Marshall, Stephen & Manley, Ed, 2021. "Understanding the roles of rail stations: Insights from network approaches in the London metropolitan area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:94:y:2021:i:c:s0966692321001630
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692321001630
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evert Meijers, 2007. "From Central Place To Network Model: Theory And Evidence Of A Paradigm Change," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 98(2), pages 245-259, April.
    2. Estefania Ruiz Vargas & Lindi M. Wahl, 2014. "The gateway coefficient: a novel metric for identifying critical connections in modular networks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 87(7), pages 1-10, July.
    3. Cats, Oded & Wang, Qian & Zhao, Yu, 2015. "Identification and classification of public transport activity centres in Stockholm using passenger flows data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 10-22.
    4. Zhang, Yuerong & Marshall, Stephen & Manley, Ed, 2019. "Network criticality and the node-place-design model: Classifying metro station areas in Greater London," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Roger Guimerà & Luís A. Nunes Amaral, 2005. "Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 433(7028), pages 895-900, February.
    6. Arnaud Adam & Jean-Charles Delvenne & Isabelle Thomas, 2017. "Cartography of interaction fields in and around Brussels: Commuting, moves and telephone calls," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2933, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    7. Wang, Xiangrong & Koç, Yakup & Derrible, Sybil & Ahmad, Sk Nasir & Pino, Willem J.A. & Kooij, Robert E., 2017. "Multi-criteria robustness analysis of metro networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 474(C), pages 19-31.
    8. Huang, Jie & Levinson, David M., 2015. "Circuity in urban transit networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 145-153.
    9. Camille Roth & Soong Moon Kang & Michael Batty & Marc Barthélemy, 2011. "Structure of Urban Movements: Polycentric Activity and Entangled Hierarchical Flows," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-8, January.
    10. Xiaolu Zhou, 2015. "Understanding Spatiotemporal Patterns of Biking Behavior by Analyzing Massive Bike Sharing Data in Chicago," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Martijn Burger & Evert Meijers, 2012. "Form Follows Function? Linking Morphological and Functional Polycentricity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(5), pages 1127-1149, April.
    12. Yao Shen & Michael Batty, 2019. "Delineating the perceived functional regions of London from commuting flows," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(3), pages 547-550, May.
    13. Vale, David S. & Viana, Cláudia M. & Pereira, Mauro, 2018. "The extended node-place model at the local scale: Evaluating the integration of land use and transport for Lisbon's subway network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 282-293.
    14. Chen Zhong & Michael Batty & Ed Manley & Jiaqiu Wang & Zijia Wang & Feng Chen & Gerhard Schmitt, 2016. "Variability in Regularity: Mining Temporal Mobility Patterns in London, Singapore and Beijing Using Smart-Card Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Jing-Dong J. Han & Nicolas Bertin & Tong Hao & Debra S. Goldberg & Gabriel F. Berriz & Lan V. Zhang & Denis Dupuy & Albertha J. M. Walhout & Michael E. Cusick & Frederick P. Roth & Marc Vidal, 2004. "Erratum: Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction network," Nature, Nature, vol. 430(6997), pages 380-380, July.
    16. Joris Beckers & Isabelle Thomas & Thomas Vanoutrive & Ann Verhetsel, 2018. "Logistics clusters, including inter-firm relations through community detection," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2947, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    17. Beckers, Joris & Vanhoof, Maarten & Verhetsel, Ann, 2019. "Returning the particular: Understanding hierarchies in the Belgian logistics system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 315-324.
    18. Leland H. Hartwell & John J. Hopfield & Stanislas Leibler & Andrew W. Murray, 1999. "From molecular to modular cell biology," Nature, Nature, vol. 402(6761), pages 47-52, December.
    19. Yingcheng Li & Nicholas A. Phelps, 2017. "Knowledge polycentricity and the evolving Yangtze River Delta megalopolis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(7), pages 1035-1047, July.
    20. Oded Cats & Erik Jenelius, 2014. "Dynamic Vulnerability Analysis of Public Transport Networks: Mitigation Effects of Real-Time Information," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 435-463, December.
    21. Jing-Dong J. Han & Nicolas Bertin & Tong Hao & Debra S. Goldberg & Gabriel F. Berriz & Lan V. Zhang & Denis Dupuy & Albertha J. M. Walhout & Michael E. Cusick & Frederick P. Roth & Marc Vidal, 2004. "Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction network," Nature, Nature, vol. 430(6995), pages 88-93, July.
    22. B. Berche & C. von Ferber & T. Holovatch & Yu. Holovatch, 2009. "Resilience of public transport networks against attacks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 71(1), pages 125-137, September.
    23. Zemp, Stefan & Stauffacher, Michael & Lang, Daniel J. & Scholz, Roland W., 2011. "Classifying railway stations for strategic transport and land use planning: Context matters!," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 670-679.
    24. Ann Verhetsel & Joris Beckers & Michiel Meyere, 2018. "Assessing Daily Urban Systems: A Heterogeneous Commuting Network Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 633-656, September.
    25. Sybil Derrible & Christopher Kennedy, 2010. "Characterizing metro networks: state, form, and structure," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 275-297, March.
    26. John B. Parr, 2014. "The Regional Economy, Spatial Structure and Regional Urban Systems," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(12), pages 1926-1938, December.
    27. D. Brockmann & L. Hufnagel & T. Geisel, 2006. "The scaling laws of human travel," Nature, Nature, vol. 439(7075), pages 462-465, January.
    28. Calatayud, Agustina & Mangan, John & Palacin, Roberto, 2017. "Connectivity to international markets: A multi-layered network approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 61-71.
    29. Saberi, Meead & Ghamami, Mehrnaz & Gu, Yi & Shojaei, Mohammad Hossein (Sam) & Fishman, Elliot, 2018. "Understanding the impacts of a public transit disruption on bicycle sharing mobility patterns: A case of Tube strike in London," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 154-166.
    30. Freke Caset & David S. Vale & Cláudia M. Viana, 2018. "Measuring the Accessibility of Railway Stations in the Brussels Regional Express Network: a Node-Place Modeling Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 495-530, September.
    31. Haoran Yang & Frédéric Dobruszkes & Jiaoe Wang & Martin Dijst & Patrick Wiik, 2018. "Comparing China's urban systems in high-speed railway and airline networks," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/269363, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    32. Liu, Xi & Gong, Li & Gong, Yongxi & Liu, Yu, 2015. "Revealing travel patterns and city structure with taxi trip data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 78-90.
    33. Freke Caset & David S. Vale & Cláudia M. Viana, 2018. "Correction to: Measuring the Accessibility of Railway Stations in the Brussels Regional Express Network: a Node-Place Modeling Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 531-531, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Yuerong & Marshall, Stephen & Manley, Ed, 2019. "Network criticality and the node-place-design model: Classifying metro station areas in Greater London," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Weustenenk, Anne Gerda & Mingardo, Giuliano, 2023. "Towards a typology of mobility hubs," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    3. Cats, Oded & Krishnakumari, Panchamy, 2020. "Metropolitan rail network robustness," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 549(C).
    4. Nigro, Antonio & Bertolini, Luca & Moccia, Francesco Domenico, 2019. "Land use and public transport integration in small cities and towns: Assessment methodology and application," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 110-124.
    5. Cats, Oded & Wang, Qian & Zhao, Yu, 2015. "Identification and classification of public transport activity centres in Stockholm using passenger flows data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 10-22.
    6. Lahoorpoor, Bahman & Levinson, David M., 2020. "Catchment if you can: The effect of station entrance and exit locations on accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Wei Wu & Prasanna Divigalpitiya, 2022. "Assessment of Accessibility and Activity Intensity to Identify Future Development Priority TODs in Hefei City," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Cats, O., 2016. "The robustness value of public transport development plans," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 236-246.
    9. Cai, Hua & Zhan, Xiaowei & Zhu, Ji & Jia, Xiaoping & Chiu, Anthony S.F. & Xu, Ming, 2016. "Understanding taxi travel patterns," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 457(C), pages 590-597.
    10. Zhou, Yang & Thill, Jean-Claude & Xu, Yang & Fang, Zhixiang, 2021. "Variability in individual home-work activity patterns," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Lin, Pengfei & Weng, Jiancheng & Fu, Yu & Alivanistos, Dimitrios & Yin, Baocai, 2020. "Study on the topology and dynamics of the rail transit network based on automatic fare collection data," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    12. Ben Derudder & Zachary Neal, 2018. "Uncovering Links Between Urban Studies and Network Science," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 441-446, September.
    13. Meead Saberi & Taha H. Rashidi & Milad Ghasri & Kenneth Ewe, 2018. "A Complex Network Methodology for Travel Demand Model Evaluation and Validation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1051-1073, December.
    14. Lin Zhang & Jian Lu & Bai-bai Fu & Shu-bin Li, 2018. "A Review and Prospect for the Complexity and Resilience of Urban Public Transit Network Based on Complex Network Theory," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-36, December.
    15. Yau-Hua Yu & Hsu-Ko Kuo & Kuo-Wei Chang, 2008. "The Evolving Transcriptome of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(9), pages 1-11, September.
    16. Yanyan Wu & Jiadong Yuan, 2022. "Is There a Regulation in the Expansion of Urban Spatial Structure? Empirical Study from the Main Urban Area in Zhengzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    17. Freke Caset & Filipe M Teixeira, 2022. "Visualizing the potential for transit-oriented development: Insights from an open and interactive planning support tool in Flanders, Belgium," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 411-426, February.
    18. Yat Yen & Pengjun Zhao & Muhammad T Sohail, 2021. "The morphology and circuity of walkable, bikeable, and drivable street networks in Phnom Penh, Cambodia," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(1), pages 169-185, January.
    19. Su, Shiliang & Zhang, Hui & Wang, Miao & Weng, Min & Kang, Mengjun, 2021. "Transit-oriented development (TOD) typologies around metro station areas in urban China: A comparative analysis of five typical megacities for planning implications," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    20. Nir Kaplan & Itzhak Omer, 2022. "Multiscale Accessibility—A New Perspective of Space Structuration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:94:y:2021:i:c:s0966692321001630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.