IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v19y2012i1p124-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Website usability, consumer satisfaction and the intention to use a website: The moderating effect of perceived risk

Author

Listed:
  • Belanche, Daniel
  • Casaló, Luis V.
  • Guinalíu, Miguel

Abstract

This paper analyzes the influence of website usability on both consumers' satisfaction and intention to use a website, as well as the impact of satisfaction on usage intentions. Additionally, we study the moderating effect that consumer risk perceptions may have on the influence of website usability. Results show that website usability affects satisfaction which in turn affects intention to use. Contrary to expected, usability does not directly affect intention to use but has an indirect effect through consumer satisfaction. Finally, the usability effect on consumer satisfaction is moderated by perceived risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Belanche, Daniel & Casaló, Luis V. & Guinalíu, Miguel, 2012. "Website usability, consumer satisfaction and the intention to use a website: The moderating effect of perceived risk," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 124-132.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:19:y:2012:i:1:p:124-132
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.11.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698911001160
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.11.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oliver, Richard L & DeSarbo, Wayne S, 1988. "Response Determinants in Satisfaction Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(4), pages 495-507, March.
    2. Kent W. Smith, 1974. "On Estimating the Reliability of Composite Indexes Through Factor Analysis," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 2(4), pages 485-510, May.
    3. Eugene W. Anderson & Mary W. Sullivan, 1993. "The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 125-143.
    4. Kim, Jiyoung & Jin, Byoungho & Swinney, Jane L., 2009. "The role of etail quality, e-satisfaction and e-trust in online loyalty development process," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 239-247.
    5. Sarv Devaraj & Ming Fan & Rajiv Kohli, 2002. "Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 316-333, September.
    6. Ladhari, Riadh, 2010. "Developing e-service quality scales: A literature review," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 464-477.
    7. Bridges, Eileen & Florsheim, Renée, 2008. "Hedonic and utilitarian shopping goals: The online experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 309-314, April.
    8. Kulviwat, Songpol & Bruner II, Gordon C. & Al-Shuridah, Obaid, 2009. "The role of social influence on adoption of high tech innovations: The moderating effect of public/private consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(7), pages 706-712, July.
    9. Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne, 1985. "Measuring the Involvement Construct," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(3), pages 341-352, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michel Serieys, 2006. "Continuité ou discontinuité : un test empirique de la Satisfaction des Internautes pour les Fournisseurs d'Accès et de Services Internet," Post-Print halshs-00134432, HAL.
    2. Ageeva, Elena & Melewar, T.C. & Foroudi, Pantea & Dennis, Charles, 2019. "Cues adopted by consumers in examining corporate website favorability: An empirical study of financial institutions in the UK and Russia," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 15-32.
    3. Andreas Herrmann & Michael D. Johnson, 1999. "Die Kundenzufriedenheit als Bestimmungsfaktor der Kundenbindung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 579-598, June.
    4. Chetan A. Jhaveri & Jitendra M. Nenavani, 2020. "Evaluation of eTail Services Quality: AHP Approach," Vision, , vol. 24(3), pages 310-319, September.
    5. Harith Yas Khudhair & Ahmad Jusoh & Abbas Mardani & Khalil Md Nor & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "Review of Scoping Studies on Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty in the Airline Industry," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 13(4), December.
    6. Tibert Verhagen & Daniel Bloemers, 2018. "Exploring the cognitive and affective bases of online purchase intentions: a hierarchical test across product types," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 537-561, September.
    7. Dwivedi, Abhishek, 2015. "A higher-order model of consumer brand engagement and its impact on loyalty intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 100-109.
    8. Khan, Kamran & Hameed, Irfan, 2017. "The mediation of customer satisfaction and moderation of Price: Evidence from the generation Y users of cell phones," MPRA Paper 91773, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Gaby Odekerken-Schröder & Bloemer Josée, 2002. "Constraints and Dedication as Drivers for Relationship Commitment: An Empirical Study in a Health-Care Context," Research Memorandum 078, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    10. Pallant, Jessica & Sands, Sean & Karpen, Ingo, 2020. "Product customization: A profile of consumer demand," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    11. Thakur, Rakhi, 2018. "Customer engagement and online reviews," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 48-59.
    12. Lei Huang, 2017. "Birds of a feather: a normative model of assessing consumers’ satisfaction in a generalized expectation–disconfirmation paradigm," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 5-13, March.
    13. Kamran Khan & Dr. Irfan Hameed, 2017. "The mediation of customer satisfaction and moderation of Price: Evidence from the generation Y users of cell phones," KASBIT Business Journals (KBJ), Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Institute of Technology (KASBIT), vol. 10, pages 21-56, December.
    14. Mason, Michela C. & Paggiaro, Adriano, 2012. "Investigating the role of festivalscape in culinary tourism: The case of food and wine events," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1329-1336.
    15. Nancy K. Lankton & D. Harrison McKnight & Ryan T. Wright & Jason Bennett Thatcher, 2016. "Research Note—Using Expectation Disconfirmation Theory and Polynomial Modeling to Understand Trust in Technology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 197-213, March.
    16. Xueming Luo & Xianghua Lu & Jing Li, 2019. "When and How to Leverage E-commerce Cart Targeting: The Relative and Moderated Effects of Scarcity and Price Incentives with a Two-Stage Field Experiment and Causal Forest Optimization," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1203-1227, December.
    17. Frank, Björn & Herbas Torrico, Boris & Enkawa, Takao & Schvaneveldt, Shane J., 2014. "Affect versus Cognition in the Chain from Perceived Quality to Customer Loyalty: The Roles of Product Beliefs and Experience," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(4), pages 567-586.
    18. Papagiannidis, Savvas & See-To, Eric & Bourlakis, Michael, 2014. "Virtual test-driving: The impact of simulated products on purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 877-887.
    19. Omar, Suha & Mohsen, Kholoud & Tsimonis, Georgios & Oozeerally, Adam & Hsu, Jen-Hsien, 2021. "M-commerce: The nexus between mobile shopping service quality and loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    20. Federico Gaudenzi, 2020. "Bias in purchase decisions: correlation between expectations and procrastination in high and low involvement products," Working Papers hal-02560384, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:19:y:2012:i:1:p:124-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.