IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v98y2021ics030504831930711x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new exact algorithm for the Weapon-Target Assignment problem

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Yiping
  • Chen, Danny Z.

Abstract

The Weapon-Target Assignment (WTA) problem is of military importance; it computes an optimal assignment of m weapons to n targets such that the expected total damage of the targets is maximized (or equivalently, the expected total survival possibility of the targets is minimized). The WTA problem is known to be NP-complete and was commonly formulated as nonlinear models. In previous studies, the largest WTA problem instances that could be solved exactly were of only moderate sizes (e.g., 80 weapons and 80 targets, with a long execution time of 16.2 h). In this paper, unlike the previous methods that tackled the WTA problem as nonlinear models, we formulate the problem as a linear model, and present a new exact algorithm that is much more efficient for solving the problem. More specifically, our new exact algorithm formulates the WTA problem as an integer linear programming model which has binary columns, and solves the model using column enumeration as well as branch and bound techniques. To drastically reduce the number of columns needed to be enumerated, we propose new methods called weapon number bounding and weapon domination. Extensive computational experiments are conducted, and the results show that our new exact algorithm can solve all the instances considered by previous studies but our solutions take much shorter execution time. In particular, the execution time for exactly solving the instance of 80 weapons and 80 targets is only 0.40 s. Furthermore, we can solve exactly much larger problem instances than previous methods, and the maximum problem size that we can solve exactly is up to 400 weapons and 400 targets, with an average execution time of 4.68 s. In addition, our method can be extended to be applicable to the Assignment of Assets to Tasks (AATT) problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Yiping & Chen, Danny Z., 2021. "A new exact algorithm for the Weapon-Target Assignment problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:98:y:2021:i:c:s030504831930711x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2019.102138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030504831930711X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2019.102138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard H. Day, 1966. "Allocating Weapons to Target Complexes by Means of Nonlinear Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(6), pages 992-1013, December.
    2. Martin Savelsbergh, 1997. "A Branch-and-Price Algorithm for the Generalized Assignment Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(6), pages 831-841, December.
    3. Cynthia Barnhart & Ellis L. Johnson & George L. Nemhauser & Martin W. P. Savelsbergh & Pamela H. Vance, 1998. "Branch-and-Price: Column Generation for Solving Huge Integer Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 316-329, June.
    4. Alan S. Manne, 1958. "A Target-Assignment Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 346-351, June.
    5. Warren P. Adams & Stephen M. Henry, 2012. "Base-2 Expansions for Linearizing Products of Functions of Discrete Variables," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1477-1490, December.
    6. Alberto Ceselli & Giovanni Righini, 2006. "A Branch-and-Price Algorithm for the Multilevel Generalized Assignment Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1172-1184, December.
    7. Ravindra K. Ahuja & Arvind Kumar & Krishna C. Jha & James B. Orlin, 2007. "Exact and Heuristic Algorithms for the Weapon-Target Assignment Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(6), pages 1136-1146, December.
    8. Ojeong Kwon & Kyungsik Lee & Donghan Kang & Sungsoo Park, 2007. "A branch‐and‐price algorithm for a targeting problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(7), pages 732-741, October.
    9. Eitan Wacholder, 1989. "A Neural Network-Based Optimization Algorithm for the Static Weapon-Target Assignment Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 1(4), pages 232-246, November.
    10. Kevin Glazebrook & Alan Washburn, 2004. "Shoot-Look-Shoot: A Review and Extension," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 454-463, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandre Colaers Andersen & Konstantin Pavlikov & Túlio A. M. Toffolo, 2022. "Weapon-target assignment problem: exact and approximate solution algorithms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 581-606, May.
    2. Hughes, Michael S. & Lunday, Brian J., 2022. "The Weapon Target Assignment Problem: Rational Inference of Adversary Target Utility Valuations from Observed Solutions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chan Y. Han & Brian J. Lunday & Matthew J. Robbins, 2016. "A Game Theoretic Model for the Optimal Location of Integrated Air Defense System Missile Batteries," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 405-416, August.
    2. Alexander G. Kline & Darryl K. Ahner & Brian J. Lunday, 2019. "Real-time heuristic algorithms for the static weapon target assignment problem," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 377-397, June.
    3. Anissa Frini & Adel Guitouni & Abderrezak Benaskeur, 2017. "Solving Dynamic Multi-Criteria Resource-Target Allocation Problem Under Uncertainty: A Comparison of Decomposition and Myopic Approaches," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1465-1496, November.
    4. Alexandre Colaers Andersen & Konstantin Pavlikov & Túlio A. M. Toffolo, 2022. "Weapon-target assignment problem: exact and approximate solution algorithms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 581-606, May.
    5. Davis, Michael T. & Robbins, Matthew J. & Lunday, Brian J., 2017. "Approximate dynamic programming for missile defense interceptor fire control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 873-886.
    6. Ravindra K. Ahuja & Arvind Kumar & Krishna C. Jha & James B. Orlin, 2007. "Exact and Heuristic Algorithms for the Weapon-Target Assignment Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(6), pages 1136-1146, December.
    7. Ojeong Kwon & Donghan Kang & Kyungsik Lee & Sungsoo Park, 1999. "Lagrangian relaxation approach to the targeting problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(6), pages 640-653, September.
    8. Alexander G. Kline & Darryl K. Ahner & Brian J. Lunday, 2020. "A heuristic and metaheuristic approach to the static weapon target assignment problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 78(4), pages 791-812, December.
    9. Gülpınar, Nalan & Çanakoğlu, Ethem & Branke, Juergen, 2018. "Heuristics for the stochastic dynamic task-resource allocation problem with retry opportunities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 291-303.
    10. Ahmet Silav & Orhan Karasakal & Esra Karasakal, 2019. "Bi‐objective missile rescheduling for a naval task group with dynamic disruptions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(7), pages 596-615, October.
    11. Juan Li & Bin Xin & Panos M. Pardalos & Jie Chen, 2021. "Solving bi-objective uncertain stochastic resource allocation problems by the CVaR-based risk measure and decomposition-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 639-666, January.
    12. Amy Cohn & Michael Magazine & George Polak, 2009. "Rank‐Cluster‐and‐Prune: An algorithm for generating clusters in complex set partitioning problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(3), pages 215-225, April.
    13. Albert H. Schrotenboer & Evrim Ursavas & Iris F. A. Vis, 2019. "A Branch-and-Price-and-Cut Algorithm for Resource-Constrained Pickup and Delivery Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 1001-1022, July.
    14. Richard Freling & H. Edwin Romeijn & Dolores Romero Morales & Albert P. M. Wagelmans, 2003. "A Branch-and-Price Algorithm for the Multiperiod Single-Sourcing Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(6), pages 922-939, December.
    15. Marc Peeters & Zeger Degraeve, 2004. "The Co-Printing Problem: A Packing Problem with a Color Constraint," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 623-638, August.
    16. Peters, Emmanuel & de Matta, Renato & Boe, Warren, 2007. "Short-term work scheduling with job assignment flexibility for a multi-fleet transport system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(1), pages 82-98, July.
    17. Ojeong Kwon & Kyungsik Lee & Donghan Kang & Sungsoo Park, 2007. "A branch‐and‐price algorithm for a targeting problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(7), pages 732-741, October.
    18. Sarac, Abdulkadir & Batta, Rajan & Rump, Christopher M., 2006. "A branch-and-price approach for operational aircraft maintenance routing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1850-1869, December.
    19. Ahmet Silav & Esra Karasakal & Orhan Karasakal, 2022. "Bi-objective dynamic weapon-target assignment problem with stability measure," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 1229-1247, April.
    20. Marco E. Lübbecke & Jacques Desrosiers, 2005. "Selected Topics in Column Generation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 1007-1023, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:98:y:2021:i:c:s030504831930711x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.