IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobuve/v6y2016icp21-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward a more nuanced understanding of long-tail distributions and their generative process in entrepreneurship

Author

Listed:
  • Shim, Jaehu

Abstract

Crawford et al.’s (2014, 2015) research on empirical distributions in entrepreneurship has shown that almost all input and outcome variables in entrepreneurship follow highly skewed long-tail distributions. They refer to these as power-law (PL) distributions based on a quantitative PL fitting procedure. However, the generative process of these distributions is still unclear. Building on their research, I cultivate a more nuanced understanding of the long-tail distributions and their plausible generative process in entrepreneurship. In this study, the fitting procedure is applied to new ventures' initial expectations and temporal outcome variables on employment and revenue, including comparisons of fitting results from alternative long-tail models. In conclusion, I find that ventures' less skewed early-stage outcome distributions change into more skewed PL distributions over time, while most expectation distributions do not fit a specific long-tail model. Using a simple simulation, I suggest that a multiplicative process may be a plausible generative mechanism for the transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Shim, Jaehu, 2016. "Toward a more nuanced understanding of long-tail distributions and their generative process in entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 21-27.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobuve:v:6:y:2016:i:c:p:21-27
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2016.08.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673416300221
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbvi.2016.08.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reynolds, Paul D. & Curtin, Richard T., 2008. "Business Creation in the United States: Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics II Initial Assessment," Foundations and Trends(R) in Entrepreneurship, now publishers, vol. 4(3), pages 155-307, January.
    2. Vuong, Quang H, 1989. "Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-nested Hypotheses," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 307-333, March.
    3. Jeff Alstott & Ed Bullmore & Dietmar Plenz, 2014. "powerlaw: A Python Package for Analysis of Heavy-Tailed Distributions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Crawford, G. Christopher & Aguinis, Herman & Lichtenstein, Benyamin & Davidsson, Per & McKelvey, Bill, 2015. "Power law distributions in entrepreneurship: Implications for theory and research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 696-713.
    5. Makoto Nirei & Wataru Souma, 2007. "A Two Factor Model Of Income Distribution Dynamics," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 53(3), pages 440-459, September.
    6. Christopher Crawford, G. & McKelvey, Bill & Lichtenstein, Benyamin B., 2014. "The empirical reality of entrepreneurship: How power law distributed outcomes call for new theory and method," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 1, pages 3-7.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Breig, Roman & Coblenz, Maximilian & Pelz, Michael, 2018. "Enhancing simulation-based theory development in entrepreneurship through statistical validation," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 53-59.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Breig, Roman & Coblenz, Maximilian & Pelz, Michael, 2018. "Enhancing simulation-based theory development in entrepreneurship through statistical validation," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 53-59.
    2. Katahira, Kei & Chen, Yu & Akiyama, Eizo, 2021. "Self-organized Speculation Game for the spontaneous emergence of financial stylized facts," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 582(C).
    3. Lahr, Henry, 2023. "Fat tails in private equity fund returns: The smooth double Pareto distribution," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    4. James Caton, 2017. "Entrepreneurship, search costs, and ecological rationality in an agent-based economy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 30(1), pages 107-130, March.
    5. Christopher J. Boudreaux & Anand Jha & Monica Escaleras, 2023. "Natural disasters, entrepreneurship activity, and the moderating role of country governance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1483-1508, April.
    6. Damien Challet & Nikita Gourianov, 2018. "Dynamical regularities of US equities opening and closing auctions," Post-Print hal-01702726, HAL.
    7. Boudreaux, Christopher & Jha, Anand & Escaleras, Monica, 2022. "Natural Disasters and Entrepreneurship Activity: the Moderating Role of Country Governance," MPRA Paper 115134, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Christopher Boudreaux & Anand Jha & Monica Escaleras, 2021. "Weathering the Storm: How Foreign Aid and Institutions Affect Entrepreneurship Following Natural Disasters," Papers 2104.12008, arXiv.org.
    9. Joseph Farhat & Sharon Matusik & Alicia Robb & David T. Robinson, 2018. "New directions in entrepreneurship research with the Kauffman Firm Survey," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 521-532, March.
    10. Montebruno, Piero & Bennett, Robert J. & van Lieshout, Carry & Smith, Harry, 2019. "A tale of two tails: Do Power Law and Lognormal models fit firm-size distributions in the mid-Victorian era?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 858-875.
    11. Mary Han & Bill McKelvey, 2016. "How to Grow Successful Social Entrepreneurship Firms? Key Ideas from Complexity Theory," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(03), pages 243-280, September.
    12. Booyavi, Zahra & Crawford, G. Christopher, 2023. "Different, but same: A power law perspective on how rock star female entrepreneurs reconceptualize “gender equality”," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    13. Chołoniewski, Jan & Sienkiewicz, Julian & Leban, Gregor & Hołyst, Janusz A., 2019. "Modeling of temporal fluctuation scaling in online news network with independent cascade model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 129-144.
    14. Rashidisabet, Homa & Ajilore, Olusola & Leow, Alex & Demos, Alexander P., 2022. "Revisiting power-law estimation with applications to real-world human typing dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 599(C).
    15. Yekaterina S Pavlova & David Paez-Espino & Andrew Yu Morozov & Ilya S Belalov, 2021. "Searching for fat tails in CRISPR-Cas systems: Data analysis and mathematical modeling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Katahira, Kei & Chen, Yu & Hashimoto, Gaku & Okuda, Hiroshi, 2019. "Development of an agent-based speculation game for higher reproducibility of financial stylized facts," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 524(C), pages 503-518.
    17. Simon C. Parker & Thomas Åstebro & David B Audretsch & Robert Blackburn & Andrew Burke & Alex Coad & Marc Cowling & Per Davidsson & Michael Fritsch & Francis Greene & Paul D. Reynolds & Roy Thurik, 2024. "“Remembering David J Storey, a pioneer of the entrepreneurship field”," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Banshal, Sumit Kumar & Gupta, Solanki & Lathabai, Hiran H & Singh, Vivek Kumar, 2022. "Power Laws in altmetrics: An empirical analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    19. Mincheol Choi & Chang-Yang Lee, 2020. "Power-law distributions of corporate innovative output: evidence from U.S. patent data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 519-554, January.
    20. Fabrice Gilles & Sabina Issehnane & Florent Sari, 2022. "Using short-term jobs as a way to find a regular job. What kind of role for local context?," TEPP Working Paper 2022-07, TEPP.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobuve:v:6:y:2016:i:c:p:21-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-business-venturing-insights .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.