IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jhecon/v56y2017icp71-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do individuals respond to cost-sharing subsidies in their selections of marketplace health insurance plans?

Author

Listed:
  • DeLeire, Thomas
  • Chappel, Andre
  • Finegold, Kenneth
  • Gee, Emily

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) provides assistance to low-income consumers through both premium subsidies and cost-sharing reductions (CSRs). Low-income consumers’ lack of health insurance literacy or information regarding CSRs may lead them to not take-up CSR benefits for which they are eligible. We use administrative data from 2014 to 2016 on roughly 22 million health insurance plan choices of low-income individuals enrolled in ACA Marketplace coverage to assess whether they behave in a manner consistent with being aware of the availability of CSRs. We take advantage of discontinuous changes in the schedule of CSR benefits to show that consumers are highly sensitive to the value of CSRs when selecting insurance plans and that a very low percentage select dominated plans. These findings suggest that CSR subsidies are salient to consumers and that the program is well designed to account for any lack of health insurance literacy among the low-income population it serves.

Suggested Citation

  • DeLeire, Thomas & Chappel, Andre & Finegold, Kenneth & Gee, Emily, 2017. "Do individuals respond to cost-sharing subsidies in their selections of marketplace health insurance plans?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 71-86.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:56:y:2017:i:c:p:71-86
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.09.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629617301005
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.09.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Drake, Coleman, 2019. "What are consumers willing to pay for a broad network health plan?: Evidence from covered California," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 63-77.
    2. Kurt Lavetti & Thomas DeLeire & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2023. "How do low‐income enrollees in the Affordable Care Act marketplaces respond to cost‐sharing?," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 90(1), pages 155-183, March.
    3. Gallagher, Emily A. & Gopalan, Radhakrishnan & Grinstein-Weiss, Michal, 2019. "The effect of health insurance on home payment delinquency: Evidence from ACA Marketplace subsidies," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 67-83.
    4. Drake, Coleman & Anderson, David & Cai, Sih-Ting & Sacks, Daniel W., 2023. "Financial transaction costs reduce benefit take-up evidence from zero-premium health insurance plans in Colorado," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    5. Mukhopadhyay, Sankar & Wendel, Jeanne & Zou, Miaomiao, 2019. "Impacts of shifting responsibility for high-cost individuals on Health Insurance Exchange plan premiums and cost-sharing provisions," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 180-194.
    6. Heim, Bradley T. & Hunter, Gillian & Isen, Adam & Lurie, Ithai Z. & Ramnath, Shanthi P., 2021. "Income Responses to the Affordable Care Act: Evidence from a Premium Tax Credit Notch," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    7. Chen, Hua & Ding, Yugang & Wang, Xiangnan & Yang, Yifei, 2023. "The effect of public insurance policy on the private insurance market: New evidence from a quasi-experiment in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 937-953.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:56:y:2017:i:c:p:71-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505560 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.