IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v151y2022icp651-667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geospatial analysis framework for evaluating urban design typologies in relation with the 15-minute city standards

Author

Listed:
  • Burke, Jeremy
  • Gras Alomà, Ramon
  • Yu, Fernando
  • Kruguer, Jordan

Abstract

Today, the majority of the world’s population lives in cities and it is expected that urban population will continue to grow in the coming decades. The increase in urban population will negatively impact urban performance, measured by equal access to amenities, knowledge creation and economic growth, if cities cannot respond to pressures that arise from increased migration. While urban design principles can help solve these problems, many core concepts of city form are often too abstract to allow for quantification of critical key indicators, comparative benchmarking for best practices and rigorous implementation strategies to ensure success. Given the complexity of how people interact with a city, the critical question arises: How does a city’s shape influence its urban performance? In this paper, we intend to address this fundamental question. First, we propose a framework to create a series of urban form typologies, which describe generally, a city’s shape and size, as a unifying concept to describe a city's design underlying pattern. Second, we propose that the urban form typologies can be quantified through the framework, to establish a disciplined methodology to compare the shape and scale of one city to another. The methodology combines topological (street network) and morphological (building form) features of urban form as well as other metrics related to geographic scale, entropy and density. Third, we provide a unified method to evaluate urban performance in terms of urbanization efficiency, innovation metrics and distribution of amenities. Fourth, we apply this framework to study the relationship between city typology and urban performance in order to determine which city designs are best suited to meet the demands of population growth, resource management, and energy usage. We apply this methodology to data gathered on 24 cities worldwide and their internal 8,228 subdivisions. By grouping the subdivisions into 208 agglomerations based on common urban form features, it is possible to identify and characterize their internal tapestry of city form typologies and evaluate their respective urban performance KPIs. We show that city typologies have a distinct effect on urban performance, quantify this impact and provide comparisons between the different typologies. Finally, we apply this methodology to evaluate the ability for each city typology to achieve the standards set forth by the 15-minute city, a sustainable development proposition of a decentralized city composed of walkable neighborhoods that provide equal access to housing, education and amenities.

Suggested Citation

  • Burke, Jeremy & Gras Alomà, Ramon & Yu, Fernando & Kruguer, Jordan, 2022. "Geospatial analysis framework for evaluating urban design typologies in relation with the 15-minute city standards," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 651-667.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:151:y:2022:i:c:p:651-667
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632200563X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L. M.A. Bettencourt & J. Lobo & G. B. West, 2008. "Why are large cities faster? Universal scaling and self-similarity in urban organization and dynamics," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 63(3), pages 285-293, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paweł Modrzyński & Robert Karaszewski, 2022. "Urban Energy Management—A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Lorenzo Barbieri & Roberto D’Autilia & Paola Marrone & Ilaria Montella, 2023. "Graph Representation of the 15-Minute City: A Comparison between Rome, London, and Paris," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Jones Gross & Dhiraj Murthy & Lav R. Varshney, 2017. "Pace of Life in Cities and the Emergence of Town Tweeters," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(4), pages 21582440177, December.
    2. Sandro Montresor & Gianluca Orsatti & Francesco Quatraro, 2023. "Technological novelty and key enabling technologies: evidence from European regions," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(6), pages 851-872, August.
    3. Xinyue Ye & Yichun Xie, 2012. "Re-examination of Zipf’s law and urban dynamic in China: a regional approach," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 49(1), pages 135-156, August.
    4. Deborah Strumsky & Jose Lobo & Charlotta Mellander, 2021. "As different as night and day: Scaling analysis of Swedish urban areas and regional labor markets," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(2), pages 231-247, February.
    5. Frederick, Chad & Hammersmith, Anna & Gilderbloom, John Hans, 2019. "Putting ‘place’ in its place: Comparing place-based factors in interurban analyses of life expectancy in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 148-155.
    6. Yusra Ghafoor & Yi-Shin Chen & Kuan-Ta Chen, 2019. "Social Interaction Scaling for Contact Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Francisco Martínez, 2016. "Cities’ power laws: the stochastic scaling factor," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(2), pages 257-275, March.
    8. Cortés-Gutiérrez, E.A. & Herrera-Sancho, O.A., 2021. "Urban growth tendency of electrical cables in the Costa Rican Metropolitan Area," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 562(C).
    9. Chenyi Cai & Zifeng Guo & Baizhou Zhang & Xiao Wang & Biao Li & Peng Tang, 2021. "Urban Morphological Feature Extraction and Multi-Dimensional Similarity Analysis Based on Deep Learning Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Alves, Luiz G.A. & Ribeiro, Haroldo V. & Mendes, Renio S., 2013. "Scaling laws in the dynamics of crime growth rate," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(11), pages 2672-2679.
    11. Luiz G A Alves & Haroldo V Ribeiro & Ervin K Lenzi & Renio S Mendes, 2013. "Distance to the Scaling Law: A Useful Approach for Unveiling Relationships between Crime and Urban Metrics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-8, August.
    12. Ronan Lyons & Elisa Maria Tirindelli, 2022. "The Rise & Fall of Urban Concentration in Britain: Zipf, Gibrat and Gini across two centuries," Trinity Economics Papers tep0522, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics.
    13. Juste Raimbault, 2020. "Indirect evidence of network effects in a system of cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(1), pages 138-155, January.
    14. Lars Mewes, 2018. "Scaling of Atypical Knowledge Combinations in American Metropolitan Areas from 1836 to 2010," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1841, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Nov 2018.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:151:y:2022:i:c:p:651-667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.