IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v88y2019icp19-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fair dynamic valuation of insurance liabilities: Merging actuarial judgement with market- and time-consistency

Author

Listed:
  • Barigou, Karim
  • Chen, Ze
  • Dhaene, Jan

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the fair valuation of insurance liabilities in a dynamic multi-period setting. We define a fair dynamic valuation as a valuation which is actuarial (mark-to-model for claims independent of financial market evolutions), market-consistent (mark-to-market for any hedgeable part of a claim) and time-consistent, extending the work of Dhaene et al. (2017) and Barigou and Dhaene (2019). We provide a complete hedging characterization for fair dynamic valuations. Moreover, we show how to implement fair dynamic valuations through a backward iterations scheme combining risk minimization methods from mathematical finance with standard actuarial techniques based on risk measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Barigou, Karim & Chen, Ze & Dhaene, Jan, 2019. "Fair dynamic valuation of insurance liabilities: Merging actuarial judgement with market- and time-consistency," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 19-29.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:88:y:2019:i:c:p:19-29
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2019.05.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668718305122
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2019.05.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carriere, Jacques F., 1996. "Valuation of the early-exercise price for options using simulations and nonparametric regression," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 19-30, December.
    2. Elisa Luciano & Luca Regis & Elena Vigna, 2017. "Single- and Cross-Generation Natural Hedging of Longevity and Financial Risk," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 84(3), pages 961-986, September.
    3. Malamud, Semyon & Trubowitz, Eugene & Wüthrich, Mario V., 2008. "Market Consistent Pricing of Insurance Products," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(2), pages 483-526, November.
    4. M. A. Milevsky & S. D. Promislow & V. R. Young, 2006. "Killing the Law of Large Numbers: Mortality Risk Premiums and the Sharpe Ratio," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 73(4), pages 673-686, December.
    5. Riedel, Frank, 2004. "Dynamic coherent risk measures," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 185-200, August.
    6. Antoon Pelsser & Mitja Stadje, 2014. "Time-Consistent And Market-Consistent Evaluations," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 25-65, January.
    7. Coleman, Thomas F. & Li, Yuying & Patron, Maria-Cristina, 2006. "Hedging guarantees in variable annuities under both equity and interest rate risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 215-228, April.
    8. Dhaene, Jan & Stassen, Ben & Barigou, Karim & Linders, Daniël & Chen, Ze, 2017. "Fair valuation of insurance liabilities: Merging actuarial judgement and market-consistency," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 14-27.
    9. Föllmer, H. & Schweizer, M., 1988. "Hedging by Sequential Regression: An Introduction to the Mathematics of Option Trading," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 147-160, November.
    10. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2015. "Multi-portfolio time consistency for set-valued convex and coherent risk measures," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 67-107, January.
    11. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt43n1k4jb, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
    12. Berend Roorda & J. M. Schumacher & Jacob Engwerda, 2005. "Coherent Acceptability Measures In Multiperiod Models," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(4), pages 589-612, October.
    13. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean-Marc Eber & David Heath & Hyejin Ku, 2007. "Coherent multiperiod risk adjusted values and Bellman’s principle," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 5-22, July.
    14. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 113-147.
    15. Nelson Areal & Artur Rodrigues & Manuel Armada, 2008. "On improving the least squares Monte Carlo option valuation method," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 119-151, March.
    16. Freddy Delbaen & Shige Peng & Emanuela Rosazza Gianin, 2010. "Representation of the penalty term of dynamic concave utilities," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 449-472, September.
    17. Rob Kaas & Marc Goovaerts & Jan Dhaene & Michel Denuit, 2008. "Modern Actuarial Risk Theory," Springer Books, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-540-70998-5, September.
    18. Stadje, M.A. & Pelsser, A., 2014. "Time-Consistent and Market-Consistent Evaluations (Revised version of 2012-086)," Discussion Paper 2014-002, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    19. Patrick Cheridito & Michael Kupper, 2011. "Composition Of Time-Consistent Dynamic Monetary Risk Measures In Discrete Time," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(01), pages 137-162.
    20. Manuel Moreno & Javier Navas, 2003. "On the Robustness of Least-Squares Monte Carlo (LSM) for Pricing American Derivatives," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 107-128, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karim Barigou & Lukasz Delong, 2021. "Pricing equity-linked life insurance contracts with multiple risk factors by neural networks," Post-Print hal-02896141, HAL.
    2. Karim Barigou & Lukasz Delong, 2020. "Pricing equity-linked life insurance contracts with multiple risk factors by neural networks," Papers 2007.08804, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    3. Karim Barigou & Valeria Bignozzi & Andreas Tsanakas, 2021. "Insurance valuation: A two-step generalised regression approach," Post-Print hal-03043244, HAL.
    4. Karim Barigou & Daniel Linders & Fan Yang, 2021. "Actuarial-consistency and two-step actuarial valuations: a new paradigm to insurance valuation," Papers 2109.13796, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    5. Karim Barigou & Daniël Linders & Fan yang, 2022. "Actuarial-consistency and two-step actuarial valuations: a new paradigm to insurance valuation," Working Papers hal-03327710, HAL.
    6. Karim Barigou & Valeria Bignozzi & Andreas Tsanakas, 2020. "Insurance valuation: A two-step generalised regression approach," Papers 2012.04364, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    7. Philippe ARTZNER & Karl-Theodor EISELE & Thorsten SCHMIDT, 2022. "Insurance-Finance Arbitrage," Working Papers of LaRGE Research Center 2022-09, Laboratoire de Recherche en Gestion et Economie (LaRGE), Université de Strasbourg.
    8. Engsner, Hampus & Lindskog, Filip & Thøgersen, Julie, 2023. "Multiple-prior valuation of cash flows subject to capital requirements," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 41-56.
    9. Karim Barigou & Valeria Bignozzi & Andreas Tsanakas, 2021. "Insurance valuation: A two-step generalised regression approach," Working Papers hal-03043244, HAL.
    10. Karim Barigou & Lukasz Delong, 2021. "Pricing equity-linked life insurance contracts with multiple risk factors by neural networks," Working Papers hal-02896141, HAL.
    11. Hansjörg Albrecher & Karl‐Theodor Eisele & Mogens Steffensen & Mario V. Wüthrich, 2022. "On the cost‐of‐capital rate under incomplete market valuation," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 89(4), pages 1139-1158, December.
    12. Koch-Medina, Pablo & Moreno-Bromberg, Santiago & Ravanelli, Claudia & Šikić, Mario, 2021. "Revisiting optimal investment strategies of value-maximizing insurance firms," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 131-151.
    13. Chen, Ze & Chen, Bingzheng & Dhaene, Jan & Yang, Tianyu, 2021. "Fair dynamic valuation of insurance liabilities via convex hedging," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 1-13.
    14. Gian Paolo Clemente & Francesco Della Corte & Nino Savelli, 2021. "A Bridge between Local GAAP and Solvency II Frameworks to Quantify Capital Requirement for Demographic Risk," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Karim Barigou & Daniël Linders & Fan Yang, 2022. "Actuarial-consistency and two-step actuarial valuations: a new paradigm to insurance valuation," Post-Print hal-03327710, HAL.
    16. Delong, Łukasz & Dhaene, Jan & Barigou, Karim, 2019. "Fair valuation of insurance liability cash-flow streams in continuous time: Theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 196-208.
    17. Tahir Choulli & Catherine Daveloose & Michèle Vanmaele, 2021. "Mortality/Longevity Risk-Minimization with or without Securitization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-27, July.
    18. Gian Paolo Clemente & Francesco Della Corte & Nino Savelli, 2021. "A bridge between Local GAAP and Solvency II frameworks to quantify Capital Requirement for demographic risk," Papers 2107.10891, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Ze & Chen, Bingzheng & Dhaene, Jan & Yang, Tianyu, 2021. "Fair dynamic valuation of insurance liabilities via convex hedging," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 1-13.
    2. Pelsser, Antoon & Salahnejhad Ghalehjooghi, Ahmad, 2016. "Time-consistent actuarial valuations," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 97-112.
    3. Hampus Engsner, 2021. "Least Squares Monte Carlo applied to Dynamic Monetary Utility Functions," Papers 2101.10947, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    4. Martijn Pistorius & Mitja Stadje, 2016. "On Dynamic Deviation Measures and Continuous-Time Portfolio Optimisation," Papers 1604.08037, arXiv.org.
    5. Delong, Łukasz & Dhaene, Jan & Barigou, Karim, 2019. "Fair valuation of insurance liability cash-flow streams in continuous time: Theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 196-208.
    6. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2018. "Scalar multivariate risk measures with a single eligible asset," Papers 1807.10694, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    7. Yanhong Chen & Zachary Feinstein, 2022. "Set-valued dynamic risk measures for processes and for vectors," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 505-533, July.
    8. Hampus Engsner & Kristoffer Lindensjo & Filip Lindskog, 2018. "The value of a liability cash flow in discrete time subject to capital requirements," Papers 1808.03328, arXiv.org.
    9. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2018. "Time consistency for scalar multivariate risk measures," Papers 1810.04978, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    10. Fabozzi, Frank J. & Paletta, Tommaso & Tunaru, Radu, 2017. "An improved least squares Monte Carlo valuation method based on heteroscedasticity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 698-706.
    11. Lars Stentoft, 2013. "American option pricing using simulation with an application to the GARCH model," Chapters, in: Adrian R. Bell & Chris Brooks & Marcel Prokopczuk (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Empirical Finance, chapter 5, pages 114-147, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Hampus Engsner & Kristoffer Lindensjö & Filip Lindskog, 2020. "The value of a liability cash flow in discrete time subject to capital requirements," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 125-167, January.
    13. Engsner, Hampus & Lindskog, Filip & Thøgersen, Julie, 2023. "Multiple-prior valuation of cash flows subject to capital requirements," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 41-56.
    14. Antoon Pelsser & Mitja Stadje, 2014. "Time-Consistent And Market-Consistent Evaluations," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 25-65, January.
    15. Hampus Engsner & Filip Lindskog & Julie Thoegersen, 2021. "Multiple-prior valuation of cash flows subject to capital requirements," Papers 2109.00306, arXiv.org.
    16. Volker Krätschmer & Marcel Ladkau & Roger J. A. Laeven & John G. M. Schoenmakers & Mitja Stadje, 2018. "Optimal Stopping Under Uncertainty in Drift and Jump Intensity," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 1177-1209, November.
    17. Stentoft, Lars, 2005. "Pricing American options when the underlying asset follows GARCH processes," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 576-611, September.
    18. Gan, Guojun & Lin, X. Sheldon, 2015. "Valuation of large variable annuity portfolios under nested simulation: A functional data approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 138-150.
    19. Lars Stentoft, 2004. "Convergence of the Least Squares Monte Carlo Approach to American Option Valuation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1193-1203, September.
    20. Acciaio, Beatrice & Föllmer, Hans & Penner, Irina, 2012. "Risk assessment for uncertain cash flows: model ambiguity, discounting ambiguity, and the role of bubbles," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 50118, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:88:y:2019:i:c:p:19-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.