IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v36y2005i1p13-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the deficit distribution when ruin occurs--discrete time model

Author

Listed:
  • Gajek, Leslaw

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Gajek, Leslaw, 2005. "On the deficit distribution when ruin occurs--discrete time model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 13-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:36:y:2005:i:1:p:13-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-6687(04)00108-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grandell, Jan, 1979. "Empirical bounds for ruin probabilities," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 243-255, May.
    2. Schmidli, Hanspeter, 1999. "On the Distribution of the Surplus Prior and at Ruin," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(2), pages 227-244, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gajek, Lesław & Rudź, Marcin, 2018. "Banach Contraction Principle and ruin probabilities in regime-switching models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 45-53.
    2. Diasparra, Maikol & Romera, Rosario, 2006. "Optimal policies for discrete time risk processes with a Markov chain investment model," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws062408, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    3. Lesław Gajek & Marcin Rudź, 2020. "Finite-Horizon Ruin Probabilities in a Risk-Switching Sparre Andersen Model," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1493-1506, December.
    4. Groniowska, Agnieszka & Niemiro, Wojciech, 2005. "Controlled risk processes in discrete time: Lower and upper approximations to the optimal probability of ruin," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 433-440, June.
    5. Lesław Gajek & Marcin Rudź, 2018. "Risk-switching insolvency models," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 51, pages 129-146.
    6. Gajek, Lesław & Rudź, Marcin, 2017. "A generalization of Gerber’s inequality for ruin probabilities in risk-switching models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 236-240.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Psarrakos, Georgios & Politis, Konstadinos, 2008. "Tail bounds for the joint distribution of the surplus prior to and at ruin," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 163-176, February.
    2. Lin, X. Sheldon & Willmot, Gordon E., 2000. "The moments of the time of ruin, the surplus before ruin, and the deficit at ruin," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 19-44, August.
    3. Chiu, S. N. & Yin, C. C., 2003. "The time of ruin, the surplus prior to ruin and the deficit at ruin for the classical risk process perturbed by diffusion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 59-66, August.
    4. Emilio Gómez-Déniz & José María Sarabia & Enrique Calderín-Ojeda, 2019. "Ruin Probability Functions and Severity of Ruin as a Statistical Decision Problem," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Woo, Jae-Kyung, 2011. "Refinements of two-sided bounds for renewal equations," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 189-196, March.
    6. Peng, Xiaofan & Chen, Mi & Guo, Junyi, 2012. "Optimal dividend and equity issuance problem with proportional and fixed transaction costs," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 576-585.
    7. Zhou, Xiaowen, 2004. "When does surplus reach a certain level before ruin?," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 553-561, December.
    8. Sheldon Lin, X. & E. Willmot, Gordon & Drekic, Steve, 2003. "The classical risk model with a constant dividend barrier: analysis of the Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 551-566, December.
    9. Psarrakos, Georgios, 2009. "Asymptotic results for heavy-tailed distributions using defective renewal equations," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(6), pages 774-779, March.
    10. Cheng, Yebin & Tang, Qihe & Yang, Hailiang, 2002. "Approximations for moments of deficit at ruin with exponential and subexponential claims," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 367-378, October.
    11. Christ, Ralf & Steinebach, Josef, 1995. "Estimating the adjustment coefficient in an ARMA(p, q) risk model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 149-161, October.
    12. Schmidli, Hanspeter, 2015. "Extended Gerber–Shiu functions in a risk model with interest," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 271-275.
    13. Schmidli, Hanspeter, 2010. "Conditional law of risk processes given that ruin occurs," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 281-289, April.
    14. Danijel Grahovac, 2018. "Densities of Ruin-Related Quantities in the Cramér-Lundberg Model with Pareto Claims," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 273-288, March.
    15. Schmidli, Hanspeter, 2010. "On the Gerber-Shiu function and change of measure," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 3-11, February.
    16. Bert Zwart, 2015. "Loss rates in the single-server queue with complete rejection," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 81(3), pages 299-315, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:36:y:2005:i:1:p:13-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.