IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v121y2017i1p1-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The arduous quest for translating health care productivity gains into cost savings. Lessons from their evolution at economic scoring agencies in the Netherlands and the US

Author

Listed:
  • Klink, Ab
  • Schakel, H. Christiaan
  • Visser, Sander
  • Jeurissen, Patrick

Abstract

We analyze the assessments of recent health reforms by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) in the United States and the Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB) in the Netherlands.

Suggested Citation

  • Klink, Ab & Schakel, H. Christiaan & Visser, Sander & Jeurissen, Patrick, 2017. "The arduous quest for translating health care productivity gains into cost savings. Lessons from their evolution at economic scoring agencies in the Netherlands and the US," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 1-8.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:121:y:2017:i:1:p:1-8
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.11.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851016302834
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.11.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Congressional Budget Office, 2010. "The Long-Term Budget Outlook," Reports 21546, Congressional Budget Office.
    2. Maarse, Hans & Jeurissen, Patrick & Ruwaard, Dirk, 2016. "Results of the market-oriented reform in the Netherlands: a review," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 161-178, April.
    3. Thomson, Sarah & Busse, Reinhard & Crivelli, Luca & van de Ven, Wynand & Van de Voorde, Carine, 2013. "Statutory health insurance competition in Europe: A four-country comparison," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(3), pages 209-225.
    4. Frits Bos & Coen Teulings, 2013. "Short- and long-term forecasting by the Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB): Science, witchcraft, or practical tool for policy?," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 13(1), pages 45-56.
    5. repec:cbo:report:215461 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Smith, Peter C. & Anell, Anders & Busse, Reinhard & Crivelli, Luca & Healy, Judith & Lindahl, Anne Karin & Westert, Gert & Kene, Tobechukwu, 2012. "Leadership and governance in seven developed health systems," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 37-49.
    7. Joseph White, 2014. "The challenge of budgeting for healthcare programmes," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 14(1), pages 73-107.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. van Leersum, Nicoline & Bennemeer, Peter & Otten, Marcel & Visser, Sander & Klink, Ab & Kremer, Jan A.M., 2019. "Cure for increasing health care costs: The Bernhoven case as driver of new standards of appropriate care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(3), pages 306-311.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noort, Bart A.C. & Ahaus, Kees & van der Vaart, Taco & Chambers, Naomi & Sheaff, Rod, 2020. "How healthcare systems shape a purchaser’s strategies and actions when managing chronic care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(6), pages 628-638.
    2. Bes, Romy E. & Curfs, Emile C. & Groenewegen, Peter P. & de Jong, Judith D., 2017. "Selective contracting and channelling patients to preferred providers: A scoping review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(5), pages 504-514.
    3. Bart A C Noort & Taco van der Vaart & Kees Ahaus, 2021. "Orchestration versus bookkeeping: How stakeholder pressures drive a healthcare purchaser’s institutional logics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Joost W. Geenen & Svetlana V. Belitser & Rick A. Vreman & Martijn Bloois & Olaf H. Klungel & Cornelis Boersma & Anke M. Hövels, 2020. "A novel method for predicting the budget impact of innovative medicines: validation study for oncolytics," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(6), pages 845-853, August.
    5. Polito, Vito & Wickens, Mike, 2014. "Modelling the U.S. sovereign credit rating," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 202-218.
    6. Joost W. Geenen & Cornelis Boersma & Olaf H. Klungel & Anke M. Hövels, 2019. "Accuracy of budget impact estimations and impact on patient access: a hepatitis C case study," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(6), pages 857-867, August.
    7. Anna-Lena Trescher & Stefan Listl & Onno Galien & Frank Gabel & Olivier Kalmus, 2020. "Once bitten, twice shy? Lessons learned from an experiment to liberalize price regulations for dental care," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(3), pages 425-436, April.
    8. Frits Bos & Thomas van der Pol & Gerbert Romijn, 2018. "Should CBA’s include a correction for the marginal excess burden of taxation?," CPB Discussion Paper 370.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    9. Martin Feldstein, 2011. "Preventing a National Debt Explosion," Tax Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 25(1), pages 109-144.
    10. Groenewegen, Peter P. & Hansen, Johan & de Jong, Judith D., 2019. "Trust in times of health reform," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(3), pages 281-287.
    11. Van der Aa, Maartje J. & Paulus, Aggie T.G. & Klosse, Saskia & Evers, Silvia M.A.A. & Maarse, Johannes A. M., 2019. "The impact of reforms of national health insurance on solidarity in the Netherlands: comparing health care insurance and long-term care insurance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106225, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Mark Stabile & Sarah Thomson, 2014. "The Changing Role of Government in Financing Health Care: An International Perspective," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 52(2), pages 480-518, June.
    13. Hu, Ruiyang & Zarazaga, Carlos E., 2018. "Fiscal stabilization and the credibility of the U.S. budget sequestration spending austerity," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 54-66.
    14. Gerhards, Eva & Goerl, Caroline-Antonia & Thöne, Michael, 2012. "Tragfähigkeit der öffentlichen Finanzen: Eine Bestandsaufnahme national und international praktizierter Methoden der langfristigen Budgetanalyse [Sustainability of Public Finances: A review of inte," FiFo Reports - FiFo-Berichte 14, University of Cologne, FiFo Institute for Public Economics.
    15. Kairies-Schwarz, Nadja & Kokot, Johanna & Vomhof, Markus & Weßling, Jens, 2017. "Health insurance choice and risk preferences under cumulative prospect theory – an experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 374-397.
    16. Eric M. Leeper, 2009. "Anchoring fiscal expectations," Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, vol. 72, pages 17-42, September.
    17. Nadja Kairies-Schwarz & Johanna Kokot & Markus Vomhof & Jens Wessling, 2014. "How Do Consumers Choose Health Insurance? – An Experiment on Heterogeneity in Attribute Tastes and Risk Preferences," Ruhr Economic Papers 0537, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
    18. Nicoletta Batini & Julia Guerreiro & Giovanni Callegari, 2011. "“An Analysis of U.S. Fiscal and Generational Imbalances: Who Will Pay and How?”," IMF Working Papers 2011/072, International Monetary Fund.
    19. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/3ihldo33ik9ee94procjtfki5f is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Min Xu & Jeanne M. David & Suk Hi Kim, 2018. "The Impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 on the US Government Debt," International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 7(4), pages 01-09, October.
    21. Edith Maier & Ulrich Reimer & Nilmini Wickramasinghe, 2021. "Digital healthcare services," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(4), pages 743-746, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:121:y:2017:i:1:p:1-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.