IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/gamebe/v14y1996i2p220-246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient Computation of Behavior Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • von Stengel, Bernhard

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • von Stengel, Bernhard, 1996. "Efficient Computation of Behavior Strategies," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 220-246, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:14:y:1996:i:2:p:220-246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899-8256(96)90050-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bernhard von Stengel, 2016. "Recursive Inspection Games," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 935-952, August.
    2. Rahul Savani & Bernhard Stengel, 2015. "Game Theory Explorer: software for the applied game theorist," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 5-33, January.
    3. Bernhard Stengel, 2010. "Computation of Nash equilibria in finite games: introduction to the symposium," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 42(1), pages 1-7, January.
    4. Pahl, Lucas, 2023. "Polytope-form games and index/degree theories for extensive-form games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 444-471.
    5. Bernhard von Stengel & Antoon van den Elzen & Dolf Talman, 2002. "Computing Normal Form Perfect Equilibria for Extensive Two-Person Games," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 693-715, March.
    6. Conitzer, Vincent & Sandholm, Tuomas, 2008. "New complexity results about Nash equilibria," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 621-641, July.
    7. Etessami, Kousha, 2021. "The complexity of computing a (quasi-)perfect equilibrium for an n-player extensive form game," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 107-140.
    8. Samid Hoda & Andrew Gilpin & Javier Peña & Tuomas Sandholm, 2010. "Smoothing Techniques for Computing Nash Equilibria of Sequential Games," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 494-512, May.
    9. Govindan, Srihari & Wilson, Robert B., 2007. "Stable Outcomes of Generic Games in Extensive Form," Research Papers 1933r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    10. F. Forges & B. von Stengel, 2002. "Computionally Efficient Coordination in Games Trees," THEMA Working Papers 2002-05, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    11. Bernhard von Stengel & Françoise Forges, 2008. "Extensive-Form Correlated Equilibrium: Definition and Computational Complexity," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1002-1022, November.
    12. Nicola, Gatti & Mario, Gilli & Fabio, Panozzo, 2016. "Further results on verification problems in extensive-form games," Working Papers 347, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised 15 Jul 2016.
    13. Lucas Pahl, 2022. "Polytope-form games and Index/Degree Theories for Extensive-form games," Papers 2201.02098, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    14. Itzhak Rasooly & Carlos Gavidia-Calderon, 2020. "The importance of being discrete: on the inaccuracy of continuous approximations in auction theory," Papers 2006.03016, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    15. Srihari Govindan & Robert Wilson, 2008. "Metastable Equilibria," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 787-820, November.
    16. Shimoji, Makoto & Watson, Joel, 1998. "Conditional Dominance, Rationalizability, and Game Forms," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 161-195, December.
    17. Dreef, M.R.M., 2005. "Skill and strategy in games," Other publications TiSEM 582991aa-c179-4f11-92e0-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Gatti, Nicola & Gilli, Mario & Marchesi, Alberto, 2020. "A characterization of quasi-perfect equilibria," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 240-255.
    19. Mohtadi, Mohammad Mahdi & Nogondarian, Kazem, 2015. "Presenting an algorithm to find Nash equilibrium in two-person static games with many strategies," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 442-452.
    20. Corine M. Laan & Ana Isabel Barros & Richard J. Boucherie & Herman Monsuur & Judith Timmer, 2019. "Solving partially observable agent‐intruder games with an application to border security problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(2), pages 174-190, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:14:y:1996:i:2:p:220-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/622836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.