IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v92y2018icp181-192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life-cycle carbon budget of China's harvested wood products in 1900–2015

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Xiaobiao
  • Yang, Hongqiang
  • Chen, Jiaxin

Abstract

Harvested wood products (HWP) are essential carbon pool of the forestry sector and can play an important role in climate change mitigation. Since the 10th Conference of Parties to the United Nations Framework Conversion on Climate Change in 2009, HWP have been required to be included in forest management as an additional carbon pool in national greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory reports. China is the largest consumer of end-use HWP and the largest importer of primary HWP in the world. Thus, the carbon stocks and emissions of China's HWP must be accurately assessed for evaluating their contribution to the climate change mitigation potential of global HWP. We developed an analysis framework by using Stock-Change Approach to estimate China's HWP carbon stocks/emissions from a life-cycle perspective, which covers three HWP life-cycle stages, namely, manufacture, end use, and end-of-life disposal. Using this framework, we produced the first-ever life-cycle carbon budget for HWP consumed by China in the period 1900–2015, based on a comprehensive analysis of China-specific data. From 1900 to 2015, total wood fiber input to the HWP carbon system in China was estimated to be 8049 teragrams of carbon dioxide-equivalent (Tg CO2-eq). Of the total wood fiber input, discarded mill residue, in-use HWP, and HWP disposed of at solid waste disposal sites retained 513, 3284, and 659 Tg CO2-eq of carbon, respectively, with the remaining 3591 Tg CO2-eq of wood carbon released back to the atmosphere. Of the total emission, combustion and decomposition of mill residue, burning of fuelwood, and combustion and decomposition of retired HWP accounted for 36.5%, 24.6%, and 38.9%, respectively. Landfill methane emissions were estimated to be 780 Tg CO2-eq after considering the global warming potential of this greenhouse gas. The net HWP carbon stocks, the sum of the carbon retained by discarded mill residue and the carbon stocks of HWP in use and in landfills, minus landfill methane emissions, increased from 297 Tg CO2-eq in 1950 to 4456 Tg CO2-eq in 2015.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Xiaobiao & Yang, Hongqiang & Chen, Jiaxin, 2018. "Life-cycle carbon budget of China's harvested wood products in 1900–2015," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 181-192.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:92:y:2018:i:c:p:181-192
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.05.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934117303635
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.05.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kalt, Gerald & Höher, Martin & Lauk, Christian & Schipfer, Fabian & Kranzl, Lukas, 2016. "Carbon accounting of material substitution with biomass: Case studies for Austria investigated with IPCC default and alternative approaches," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 155-163.
    2. Kim Pingoud & Fabian Wagner, 2006. "Methane Emissions from Landfills and Carbon Dynamics of Harvested Wood Products: The First-Order Decay Revisited," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 11(5), pages 961-978, September.
    3. Yang, hongqiang & Nie, ying & Ji, chunyi, 2010. "Study on China's timber resource shortage and import structure:natural forest protection program outlook,1998 to 2008," MPRA Paper 32738, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Buongiorno, Joseph & Johnston, Craig & Zhu, Shushuai, 2017. "An assessment of gains and losses from international trade in the forest sector," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 209-217.
    5. Hongqiang Yang & Xiaobiao Zhang, 2016. "A Rethinking of the Production Approach in IPCC: Its Objectiveness in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kang, Yating & Yang, Qing & Bartocci, Pietro & Wei, Hongjian & Liu, Sylvia Shuhan & Wu, Zhujuan & Zhou, Hewen & Yang, Haiping & Fantozzi, Francesco & Chen, Hanping, 2020. "Bioenergy in China: Evaluation of domestic biomass resources and the associated greenhouse gas mitigation potentials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xufang Zhang & Changyou Sun & Jason Gordon & Ian A. Munn, 2020. "Determinants of Temporary Trade Barriers in Global Forest Products Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Liu, Shilei & Xia, Jun, 2021. "Forest harvesting restriction and forest restoration in China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    3. Luyang Zhang & Yankun Sun & Tianyuan Song & Jiaqi Xu, 2019. "Harvested Wood Products as a Carbon Sink in China, 1900–2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Sun, Changyou, 2014. "Recent growth in China's roundwood import and its global implications," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 43-53.
    5. Asada, Raphael & Stern, Tobias, 2018. "Competitive Bioeconomy? Comparing Bio-based and Non-bio-based Primary Sectors of the World," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 120-128.
    6. Luan Santos & Karl Steininger & Marcelle Candido Cordeiro & Johanna Vogel, 2022. "Current Status and Future Perspectives of Carbon Pricing Research in Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, August.
    7. Junqian Xu & Yong Liu & Liling Yang, 2018. "A Comparative Study of the Role of China and India in Sustainable Textile Competition in the U.S. Market under Green Trade Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Hosseini, Mojtaba & Brege, Staffan & Nord, Tomas, 2018. "A combined focused industry and company size investigation of the internationalization-performance relationship: The case of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) within the Swedish wood manufactu," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 110-121.
    9. Chunyi Ji & Wenbin Cao & Yong Chen & Hongqiang Yang, 2016. "Carbon Balance and Contribution of Harvested Wood Products in China Based on the Production Approach of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-10, November.
    10. Jianguo Liu, 2014. "Forest Sustainability in China and Implications for a Telecoupled World," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 230-250, January.
    11. Hongqiang Yang & Xiaobiao Zhang, 2016. "A Rethinking of the Production Approach in IPCC: Its Objectiveness in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, February.
    12. Raja Chowdhury & Nidia Caetano & Matthew J. Franchetti & Kotnoor Hariprasad, 2023. "Life Cycle Based GHG Emissions from Algae Based Bioenergy with a Special Emphasis on Climate Change Indicators and Their Uses in Dynamic LCA: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Lanhui Wang & Zichan Cui & Jari Kuuluvainen & Yongyu Sun, 2021. "Does Forest Industries in China Become Cleaner? A Prospective of Embodied Carbon Emission," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, February.
    14. Hubert Paluš & Ján Parobek & Martin Moravčík & Miroslav Kovalčík & Michal Dzian & Vlastimil Murgaš, 2020. "Projecting Climate Change Potential of Harvested Wood Products under Different Scenarios of Wood Production and Utilization: Study of Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Braun, Martin & Winner, Georg & Schwarzbauer, Peter & Stern, Tobias, 2016. "Apparent Half-Life-Dynamics of Harvested Wood Products (HWPs) in Austria: Development and analysis of weighted time-series for 2002 to 2011," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 28-34.
    16. Cherubini, Francesco & Strømman, Anders H. & Hertwich, Edgar, 2011. "Effects of boreal forest management practices on the climate impact of CO2 emissions from bioenergy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 59-66.
    17. Miguel Riviere & Sylvain Caurla, 2020. "Representations of the Forest Sector in Economic Models [Les représentations du secteur forestier dans les modèles économiques]," Post-Print hal-03088084, HAL.
    18. Zhang, Ying & Chen, Shuai, 2021. "Wood trade responses to ecological rehabilitation program: Evidence from China's new logging ban in natural forests," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    19. Gang Lin & Dong Jiang & Donglin Dong & Jingying Fu & Xiang Li, 2020. "Spatial Characteristic of Coal Production-Based Carbon Emissions in Chinese Mining Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, January.
    20. Zhai, Jun & Kuusela, Olli-Pekka, 2022. "Incidence of domestic subsidies vs. export taxes: An equilibrium displacement model of log and lumber markets in Oregon," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:92:y:2018:i:c:p:181-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.