IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/foreco/v30y2018icp13-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Logistics approaches assessment to better coordinate a forest products supply chain

Author

Listed:
  • Alayet, Chaker
  • Lehoux, Nadia
  • Lebel, Luc

Abstract

This paper presents two mathematical models to plan the key activities of a forest products supply chain encompassing different harvesting areas. These areas supply four sawmills with logs, which in turn send lumber to the construction market and chips to one paper mill. In particular, three logistics approaches are compared (i.e., Make-to-Order (MTO), Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI), and a centralized planning approach), and key performance factors used (e.g., demand satisfaction and wood fiber freshness), with the goal of optimizing harvesting, storage, transportation, and production operations while improving the competitiveness of this proposed forest products supply chain. Results demonstrate the importance of an effective balance between chips and lumber production to ensure adequate quality of finished products as well as higher profits for the entire supply chain. These results also confirm the ability of the VMI approach to reduce logistics costs for the overall forest products supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Alayet, Chaker & Lehoux, Nadia & Lebel, Luc, 2018. "Logistics approaches assessment to better coordinate a forest products supply chain," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 13-24.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:foreco:v:30:y:2018:i:c:p:13-24
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2017.11.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1104689916300599
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jfe.2017.11.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giannoccaro, Ilaria & Pontrandolfo, Pierpaolo, 2004. "Supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contracts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 131-139, May.
    2. Bredstrom, David & Lundgren, Jan T. & Ronnqvist, Mikael & Carlsson, Dick & Mason, Andrew, 2004. "Supply chain optimization in the pulp mill industry--IP models, column generation and novel constraint branches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(1), pages 2-22, July.
    3. Van Horne, Constance & Frayret, Jean-Marc & Poulin, Diane, 2006. "Creating value with innovation: From centre of expertise to the forest products industry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(7), pages 751-761, October.
    4. Yossi Aviv, 2002. "Gaining Benefits from Joint Forecasting and Replenishment Processes: The Case of Auto-Correlated Demand," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 55-74, December.
    5. Li, Xiuhui & Wang, Qinan, 2007. "Coordination mechanisms of supply chain systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(1), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Guajardo, Mario & Rönnqvist, Mikael, 2015. "Operations research models for coalition structure in collaborative logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 147-159.
    7. Disney, S. M. & Towill, D. R., 2003. "The effect of vendor managed inventory (VMI) dynamics on the Bullwhip Effect in supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 199-215, August.
    8. Afshin Mansouri, S. & Gallear, David & Askariazad, Mohammad H., 2012. "Decision support for build-to-order supply chain management through multiobjective optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 24-36.
    9. Kimmich, Christian & Fischbacher, Urs, 2016. "Behavioral determinants of supply chain integration and coexistence," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 55-77.
    10. Pülzl, Helga & Lazdinis, Marius, 2011. "May the Open Method of Coordination be a new instrument for forest policy deliberations in the European Union?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 411-418, July.
    11. Nadia Lehoux & Sophie D'Amours & Andre Langevin, 2010. "A win-win collaboration approach for a two-echelon supply chain: a case study in the pulp and paper industry," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(4), pages 493-514.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vitale, Ignacio & Dondo, Rodolfo G. & González, Matías & Cóccola, Mariana E., 2022. "Modelling and optimization of material flows in the wood pellet supply chain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan, Xiaoming & Zhang, Minghui & Liu, Ke, 2010. "A note on coordination in decentralized assembly systems with uncertain component yields," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 469-478, September.
    2. Sule Birim & Cigdem Sofyalioglu, 2017. "Evaluating vendor managed inventory systems: how incentives can benefit supply chain partners," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 163-179, January.
    3. Chaharsooghi, S. Kamal & Heydari, Jafar, 2010. "Supply chain coordination for the joint determination of order quantity and reorder point using credit option," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(1), pages 86-95, July.
    4. Darwish, M.A. & Odah, O.M., 2010. "Vendor managed inventory model for single-vendor multi-retailer supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 473-484, August.
    5. Weraikat, Dua & Zanjani, Masoumeh Kazemi & Lehoux, Nadia, 2016. "Two-echelon pharmaceutical reverse supply chain coordination with customers incentives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 41-52.
    6. Faranak Emtehani & Nasim Nahavandi & Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei, 2021. "A joint inventory–finance model for coordinating a capital-constrained supply chain with financing limitations," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-39, December.
    7. S S Chauhan & J-M Proth & A M Sarmiento & R Nagi, 2006. "Opportunistic supply chain formation from qualified partners for a new market demand," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(9), pages 1089-1099, September.
    8. Son, Joong Y. & Sheu, Chwen, 2008. "The impact of replenishment policy deviations in a decentralized supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 785-804, June.
    9. Sainathan, Arvind & Groenevelt, Harry, 2019. "Vendor managed inventory contracts – coordinating the supply chain while looking from the vendor’s perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 249-260.
    10. Guajardo, Mario & Kylinger, Martin & Rönnqvist, Mikael, 2013. "Speciality oils supply chain optimization: From a decoupled to an integrated planning approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 540-551.
    11. Xu, Kefeng & Leung, Mark T., 2009. "Stocking policy in a two-party vendor managed channel with space restrictions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 271-285, February.
    12. Xiao, Tiaojun & Xu, Tiantian, 2013. "Coordinating price and service level decisions for a supply chain with deteriorating item under vendor managed inventory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 743-752.
    13. Zhou, Maosen & Dan, Bin & Ma, Songxuan & Zhang, Xumei, 2017. "Supply chain coordination with information sharing: The informational advantage of GPOs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 785-802.
    14. Qiang Han & Yuyan Wang, 2018. "Decision and Coordination in a Low-Carbon E-Supply Chain Considering the Manufacturer’s Carbon Emission Reduction Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    15. Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 451-488, October.
    16. Sari, Kazim, 2008. "On the benefits of CPFR and VMI: A comparative simulation study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 575-586, June.
    17. Yanwei Chen & Xiaojun Liu & Kaiqing Huang & Huajun Tang, 2022. "Pricing and Service Effort Decisions of Book Dual-Channel Supply Chains with Showrooming Effect Based on Cost-Sharing Contracts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    18. Siao-Leu Phouratsamay & Safia Kedad-Sidhoum & Fanny Pascual, 2021. "Coordination of a two-level supply chain with contracts," 4OR, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 235-264, June.
    19. Mario Guajardo & Kurt Jörnsten & Mikael Rönnqvist, 2016. "Constructive and blocking power in collaborative transportation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 25-50, January.
    20. Zhang, Lu & Cui, Li & Chen, Lujie & Dai, Jing & Jin, Ziyi & Wu, Hao, 2023. "A hybrid approach to explore the critical criteria of online supply chain finance to improve supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:foreco:v:30:y:2018:i:c:p:13-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/701775/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.