IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v26y2008i5p335-347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail

Author

Listed:
  • Probst, Gilbert
  • Borzillo, Stefano

Abstract

Summary A specific form of intra-organizational networks - a community of practice (COP) - is increasingly regarded as an important structure within organizations. This network structure is well suited for the development and sharing of knowledge and practices across divisions. Our research explores the most salient reasons for the success and failure of such networks. An investigation of 57 COPs from major European and US companies led to the discovery of 10 "commandments" that lead to the successful development and sharing of best practices. It also identified five main reasons for failure.

Suggested Citation

  • Probst, Gilbert & Borzillo, Stefano, 2008. "Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 335-347, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:26:y:2008:i:5:p:335-347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237308000479
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li Huiyin, 2019. "From Periphery to the Core: Promoting College English Teachers’ Professional Development From the Perspective of Community of Practice," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(9), pages 1-74, September.
    2. Natalia Pardo & Mónica Lucía Espinosa & Catalina González-Arango & Miguel Angel Cabrera & Susana Salazar & Sonia Archila & Nancy Palacios & Diana Prieto & Ricardo Camacho & Leonardo Parra-Agudelo, 2021. "Worlding resilience in the Doña Juana Volcano-Páramo, Northern Andes (Colombia): A transdisciplinary view," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(2), pages 1845-1880, June.
    3. Cristina Páez-Avilés & Esteve Juanola-Feliu & Islam Bogachan-Tahirbegi & Mónica Mir & Manel González-Piñero & Josep Samitier, 2015. "Innovation And Technology Transfer Of Medical Devices Fostered By Cross-Disciplinary Communities Of Practitioners," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(06), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Harvey, Jean-François & Cohendet, Patrick & Simon, Laurent & Dubois, Louis-Etienne, 2013. "Another cog in the machine: Designing communities of practice in professional bureaucracies," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 27-40.
    5. Viviana Gutiérrez Rincón & Manoj Chandra Bayon & Jose Javier Aguilar Zambrano & Javier Medina Vasquez, 2022. "Exploring the Configuration of Institutional Practices—A Case Study of Innovation Implementation in Healthcare," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Karen Minyard & Tina A. Smith & Richard Turner & Bobby Milstein & Lori Solomon, 2018. "Community and programmatic factors influencing effective use of system dynamic models," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 34(1-2), pages 154-171, January.
    7. Rogo, Francesco & Cricelli, Livio & Grimaldi, Michele, 2014. "Assessing the performance of open innovation practices: A case study of a community of innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 60-80.
    8. Louise Shaw & Dana Jazayeri & Debra Kiegaldie & Meg E. Morris, 2022. "Implementation of Virtual Communities of Practice in Healthcare to Improve Capability and Capacity: A 10-Year Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-13, June.
    9. Albizu Gallastegi, Eneka & Otero Gutiérrez, Beatriz & Olazaran Rodríguez, Mikel, 2013. "Jardueran oinarritutako komunitateak enpresa txiki eta ertainetan," Revista de Dirección y Administración de Empresas, Universidad del País Vasco - Escuela Universitaria de Estudios Empresariales de San Sebastián.
    10. Wen-Bing Gau, 2022. "Forming a Learning Environment Within a Senior-Citizen Community of Practice," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, September.
    11. Virginie Jacquier-Roux & Hiroatsu Nohara & Claude Paraponaris, 2020. "La régulation dynamique des dispositifs et des situations de gestion des connaissances au cœur de l’innovation des firmes multinationales," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 23(N° spécia), pages 57-87, may.
    12. Suchul Lee & Jong-yi Hong, 2019. "Analyzing the change in knowledge sharing efficiency of knowledge networks: a case study," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 41-53, March.
    13. Thierry Burger-Helmchen & Patrick Llerena, 2008. "A case study of a creative start-up: governance, communities and knowledge management," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 125-146.
    14. Stéphanie Dameron & Emmanuel Josserand, 2009. "Le piège identitaire:identification sociale et stratégie d'acteurs dans une communauté de pratiques," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 12(1), pages 127-154, March.
    15. Gil-Izquierdo, María & Fernández-Pinedo, Nadia & Pérez-Encinas, Adriana, 2017. "Creación de Comunidades (CoP) y Redes de Práctica docentes (NoPs) para mejorar el aprendizaje activo en el contexto universitario [Creation of teaching Communities (CoP) and Networks of Practice (N," MPRA Paper 77017, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Gyewan Moon & Suk Bong Choi & Shaikh Javed Fardin, 2016. "Organisational factors for effective knowledge sharing: an empirical study of Korean learning teams," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 102-120.
    17. Karin Dessne & Katriina Byström, 2015. "Imitating CoPs: Imposing formality on informality," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(11), pages 2277-2284, November.
    18. Beth Siegel, 2016. "Best practices in the design and implementation of learning communities," Community Development Working Paper 2016-1, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    19. Egan, Cate A. & Webster, Collin & Weaver, R. Glenn & Brian, Ali & Stodden, David & Russ, Laura & Nesbitt, Danielle & Vazou, Spyridoula, 2018. "Partnerships for Active Children in Elementary Schools (PACES): First year process evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 61-69.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:26:y:2008:i:5:p:335-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.