IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v79y2020ics014971891830260x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological strategies for evaluating youth gang prevention programs

Author

Listed:
  • Brisson, Joshua
  • Pekelny, Igor
  • Ungar, Michael

Abstract

This article reflects on common challenges and lessons learned during the evaluation of gang prevention programs based on case studies of three federally funded Canadian programs. Elements of evaluation design, implementation, data analysis and reporting of results are discussed. More specifically, the article highlights issues that occur when evaluating community projects focused on preventing extreme risks for violence and the complexity of working in potentially dangerous and/or unstable work environments. Topics covered include the problem with quasi-experimental designs, model fidelity adherence, program documentation, client recruitment and retention, and data collection. Recommendations are provided to improve evaluations of youth gang prevention programs and similar community-based interventions that focus on the prevention of youth violence.

Suggested Citation

  • Brisson, Joshua & Pekelny, Igor & Ungar, Michael, 2020. "Methodological strategies for evaluating youth gang prevention programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:79:y:2020:i:c:s014971891830260x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971891830260X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101747?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liebenberg, Linda & Ungar, Michael, 2014. "A comparison of service use among youth involved with juvenile justice and mental health," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 117-122.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Axford, Nick & Tredinnick-Rowe, John & Rybcyznska-Bunt, Sarah & Burns, Lorna & Green, Finlay & Thompson, Tom, 2023. "Engaging youth at risk of violence in services: Messages from research," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vingilis, Evelyn & Stewart, Shannon & Hamilton, Hayley A. & Seeley, Jane & Einarson, Kathleen M. & Kolla, Nathan J. & Bondy, Susan J. & Erickson, Patricia G., 2020. "Pilot study of mental health and substance use of detained youths in Ontario, Canada," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    2. Theron, Linda C. & Theron, Adam M.C., 2014. "Education services and resilience processes: Resilient Black South African students' experiences," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(P3), pages 297-306.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:79:y:2020:i:c:s014971891830260x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.