IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v68y2018icp19-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors associated with the implementation of community-based peer-led health promotion programs: A scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Lorthios-Guilledroit, Agathe
  • Richard, Lucie
  • Filiatrault, Johanne

Abstract

Peer education is growing in popularity as a useful health promotion strategy. However, optimal conditions for implementing peer-led health promotion programs (HPPs) remain unclear. This scoping review aimed to describe factors that can influence implementation of peer-led HPPs targeting adult populations. Five databases were searched using the keywords “health promotion/prevention”, “implementation”, “peers”, and related terms. Studies were included if they reported at least one factor associated with the implementation of community-based peer-led HPPs. Fifty-five studies were selected for the analysis. The method known as “best fit framework synthesis” was used to analyze the factors identified in the selected papers. Many factors included in existing implementation conceptual frameworks were deemed applicable to peer-led HPPs. However, other factors related to individuals, programs, and implementation context also emerged from the analysis. Based on this synthesis, an adapted theoretical framework was elaborated, grounded in a complex adaptive system perspective and specifying potential mechanisms through which factors may influence implementation of community-based peer-led HPPs. Further research is needed to test the theoretical framework against empirical data. Findings from this scoping review increase our knowledge of the optimal conditions for implementing peer-led HPPs and thereby maximizing the benefits of such programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorthios-Guilledroit, Agathe & Richard, Lucie & Filiatrault, Johanne, 2018. "Factors associated with the implementation of community-based peer-led health promotion programs: A scoping review," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 19-33.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:68:y:2018:i:c:p:19-33
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.01.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718917301179
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.01.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walton, Mat, 2014. "Applying complexity theory: A review to inform evaluation design," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 119-126.
    2. Haggis, Tamsin, 2010. "Approaching complexity: A commentary on Keshavarz, Nutbeam, Rowling and Khavarpour," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(10), pages 1475-1477, May.
    3. Keshavarz, Nastaran & Nutbeam, Don & Rowling, Louise & Khavarpour, Freidoon, 2010. "Schools as social complex adaptive systems: A new way to understand the challenges of introducing the health promoting schools concept," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(10), pages 1467-1474, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Soumyadeep Banerjee & Abid Hussain & Sabarnee Tuladhar & Arabinda Mishra, 2019. "Building capacities of women for climate change adaptation: Insights from migrant-sending households in Nepal," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 587-609, December.
    2. Lawarée, Justin & Jacob, Steve & Ouimet, Mathieu, 2020. "A scoping review of knowledge syntheses in the field of evaluation across four decades of practice," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    3. Guilhem Dardier & Françoise Jabot & Flora Pouliquen, 2021. "Can Air Quality Citizen-Sensors Turn into Clean Air Ambassadors? Insights from a Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Robert M. Portman & Andrew R. Levy & Anthony J. Maher & Stuart J. Fairclough, 2021. "Multi-Stakeholder Retrospective Acceptability of a Peer Support Intervention for Exercise Referral," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Keith James Topping, 2022. "Peer Education and Peer Counselling for Health and Well-Being: A Review of Reviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-19, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Recepali Mafratoğlu & Fahriye Altinay & Ahmet Koç & Gokmen Dagli & Zehra Altinay, 2023. "Developing a School Improvement Scale to Transform Education into being Sustainable and Quality Driven," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, February.
    2. McGill, Elizabeth & Er, Vanessa & Penney, Tarra & Egan, Matt & White, Martin & Meier, Petra & Whitehead, Margaret & Lock, Karen & Anderson de Cuevas, Rachel & Smith, Richard & Savona, Natalie & Rutter, 2021. "Evaluation of public health interventions from a complex systems perspective: A research methods review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    3. Wolfgang A. Markham & Alan Dolan & Graham F. Moore, 2021. "A Sociological Framework to Reduce Aberrant Behaviour of School Students Through Increasing School Connectedness," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    4. Sarah Chapman & Adiilah Boodhoo & Carren Duffy & Suki Goodman & Maria Michalopoulou, 2023. "Theory of Change in Complex Research for Development Programmes: Challenges and Solutions from the Global Challenges Research Fund," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(2), pages 298-322, April.
    5. Anna Matheson, 2020. "Health Inequality as a Large-Scale Outcome of Complex Social Systems: Lessons for Action on the Sustainable Development Goals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-11, April.
    6. Simone Caschili & Francesca Romana Medda, 2012. "A Review of the Maritime Container Shipping Industry as a Complex Adaptive System," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15.
    7. Wilma E. Waterlander & Angie Luna Pinzon & Arnoud Verhoeff & Karen den Hertog & Teatske Altenburg & Coosje Dijkstra & Jutka Halberstadt & Roel Hermans & Carry Renders & Jacob Seidell & Amika Singh & M, 2020. "A System Dynamics and Participatory Action Research Approach to Promote Healthy Living and a Healthy Weight among 10–14-Year-Old Adolescents in Amsterdam: The LIKE Programme," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Xiao, Yue & Zhao, Kun & Bishai, David M. & Peters, David H., 2013. "Essential drugs policy in three rural counties in China: What does a complexity lens add?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 220-228.
    9. Pelucha, Martin & Kveton, Viktor & Potluka, Oto, 2019. "Using mixed method approach in measuring effects of training in firms: Case study of the European Social Fund support," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 146-155.
    10. Gates, Emily F., 2016. "Making sense of the emerging conversation in evaluation about systems thinking and complexity science," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 62-73.
    11. Teutsch, Friedrich & Gugglberger, Lisa & Dür, Wolfgang, 2015. "School health promotion providers’ roles in practice and theory: Results from a case study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 82-87.
    12. McIsaac, Jessie-Lee D. & Mumtaz, Zubia & Veugelers, Paul J. & Kirk, Sara F.L., 2015. "Providing context to the implementation of health promoting schools: A case study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 65-71.
    13. Michael Walton, 2023. "Adaptive Evaluation: A Complexity-Based Approach to Systematic Learning for Innovation and Scaling in Development," CID Working Papers 428, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    14. Schreuders, Michael & Nuyts, Paulien A.W. & van den Putte, Bas & Kunst, Anton E., 2017. "Understanding the impact of school tobacco policies on adolescent smoking behaviour: A realist review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 19-27.
    15. Grumadaitė Kristina & Jucevičius Giedrius, 2017. "Preconditions for Emergence of Lithuanian Clusters: from Informal Cooperation to Its Legitimation," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 77(1), pages 37-56, June.
    16. Moore, Travis & Bakken, Lori L. & Wallace, Bakari, 2019. "The importance of systems thinking, context, and inclusion when studying the feasibility of expanding the FoodShare (SNAP) outreach program to rural communities of Northern Wisconsin," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 10-17.
    17. Skovdal, Morten & Campbell, Catherine, 2015. "Beyond education: What role can schools play in the support and protection of children in extreme settings?," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 175-183.
    18. Nielsen, Jonas Vestergaard & Bredahl, Thomas Viskum Gjelstrup & Bugge, Anna & Klakk, Heidi & Skovgaard, Thomas, 2019. "Implementation of a successful long-term school based physical education intervention: Exploring provider and programme characteristics," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Wei Sun & Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov & Ho Young Shin & Wei Ping Li, 2021. "Using extended complexity theory to test SMEs’ adoption of Blockchain-based loan system," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, February.
    20. Nielsen, Jonas Vestergaard & Skovgaard, Thomas & Bredahl, Thomas Viskum Gjelstrup & Bugge, Anna & Wedderkopp, Niels & Klakk, Heidi, 2018. "Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate a school-based municipal programme tripling time spent on PE," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-11.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:68:y:2018:i:c:p:19-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.