Relational responsibilities in responsive evaluation
AbstractThis article explores how we can enhance our understanding of the moral responsibilities in daily, plural practices of responsive evaluation. It introduces an interpretive framework for understanding the moral aspects of evaluation practice. The framework supports responsive evaluators to better understand and handle their moral responsibilities. A case is introduced to illustrate our argument.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Elsevier in its journal Evaluation and Program Planning.
Volume (Year): 35 (2012)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan
Responsive evaluation; Relational responsibility; Reflection; Values; Ethics of evaluation practice;
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Abma, T. A., 2000. "Stakeholder conflict: a case study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 199-210, May.
- Greene, Jennifer C., 2010. "Serving the public good," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 197-200, May.
- Schwandt, Thomas A., 2007. "Expanding the conversation on evaluation ethics," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 400-403, November.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.