IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v265y2023ics0360544222031346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-processing of petcoke and producer gas obtained from RDF gasification in a white cement plant: A techno-economic analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Sharma, Prateek
  • Sheth, Pratik N.
  • Mohapatra, B.N.

Abstract

White cement production, unlike grey cement, depends entirely on ashless conventional fuels (oil, petcoke) to meet its thermal energy requirement. The primary barrier to utilizing any solid alternative fuel in white cement is the impact on whiteness due to ash content. The study is focused on establishing producer gas from refuse-derived fuel (RDF) gasification as an alternative fuel in clinker production in an Indian white cement plant with a 15% thermal substitution rate (TSR). A stoichiometric calciner model has been developed to predict calciner outlet parameters considering co-firing of petcoke and producer gas, where producer gas has a high heating value (HHV) of 3.95 MJ/Nm3 and gas yield of 2.36 Nm3/kg RDF. The model predicted the decrease in calciner outlet temperature by 2.6% at 15% TSR with 8.49% CO2 mitigation potential by replacing conventional fuel. It is concluded that RDF gasification is viable for white cement plants considering an IRR of 13.57% and discounted payback period of six years and two months for a 10-year gasifier operation. The study will facilitate the utilization of the RDF in white cement plants, reducing their manufacturing cost and dependence on fossil fuels.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharma, Prateek & Sheth, Pratik N. & Mohapatra, B.N., 2023. "Co-processing of petcoke and producer gas obtained from RDF gasification in a white cement plant: A techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:265:y:2023:i:c:s0360544222031346
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222031346
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126248?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fellaou, S. & Harnoune, A. & Seghra, M.A. & Bounahmidi, T., 2018. "Statistical modeling and optimization of the combustion efficiency in cement kiln precalciner," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 351-359.
    2. Silva, Isabelly P. & Lima, Rafael M.A. & Silva, Gabriel F. & Ruzene, Denise S. & Silva, Daniel P., 2019. "Thermodynamic equilibrium model based on stoichiometric method for biomass gasification: A review of model modifications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Ahlström, Johan M. & Walter, Viktor & Göransson, Lisa & Papadokonstantakis, Stavros, 2022. "The role of biomass gasification in the future flexible power system – BECCS or CCU?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 596-605.
    4. Reza, Bahareh & Soltani, Atousa & Ruparathna, Rajeev & Sadiq, Rehan & Hewage, Kasun, 2013. "Environmental and economic aspects of production and utilization of RDF as alternative fuel in cement plants: A case study of Metro Vancouver Waste Management," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 105-114.
    5. Patra, Tapas Kumar & Mukherjee, Sudeep & Sheth, Pratik N., 2019. "Process simulation of hydrogen rich gas production from producer gas using HTS catalysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1130-1140.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Essossinam Beguedou & Satyanarayana Narra & Komi Agboka & Damgou Mani Kongnine & Ekua Afrakoma Armoo, 2023. "Alternative Fuel Substitution Improvements in Low NO x In-Line Calciners," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-31, June.
    2. Samy Yousef & Vidas Lekavičius & Nerijus Striūgas, 2023. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Thermochemical Conversion of Waste Masks Generated in the EU during COVID-19 Pandemic into Energy Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wan, Zhanghao & Hu, Jianhang & Qi, Xianjin, 2021. "Numerical analysis of hydrodynamics and thermochemical property of biomass gasification in a pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    2. Reinmöller, Markus & Schreiner, Marcus & Laabs, Marcel & Scharm, Christoph & Yao, Zhitong & Guhl, Stefan & Neuroth, Manuela & Meyer, Bernd & Gräbner, Martin, 2023. "Formation and transformation of mineral phases in biomass ashes and evaluation of the feedstocks for application in high-temperature processes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 627-639.
    3. Sharma, Prateek & Sheth, Pratik N. & Sen, Subhadip, 2023. "Aspen plus simulation of an inline calciner for white cement production with a fuel mix of petcoke and producer gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    4. Safarian, Sahar & Unnthorsson, Runar & Richter, Christiaan, 2020. "The equivalence of stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric methods for modeling gasification and other reaction equilibria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Krystian Butlewski, 2022. "Concept for Biomass and Organic Waste Refinery Plants Based on the Locally Available Organic Materials in Rural Areas of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Raoul Voss & Roh Pin Lee & Magnus Fröhling, 2023. "A consequential approach to life cycle sustainability assessment with an agent‐based model to determine the potential contribution of chemical recycling to UN Sustainable Development Goals," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 726-745, June.
    7. Silva, Isabelly P. & Lima, Rafael M.A. & Santana, Hortência E.P. & Silva, Gabriel F. & Ruzene, Denise S. & Silva, Daniel P., 2022. "Development of a semi-empirical model for woody biomass gasification based on stoichiometric thermodynamic equilibrium model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    8. Manish Meena & Hrishikesh Kumar & Nitin Dutt Chaturvedi & Andrey A. Kovalev & Vadim Bolshev & Dmitriy A. Kovalev & Prakash Kumar Sarangi & Aakash Chawade & Manish Singh Rajput & Vivekanand Vivekanand , 2023. "Biomass Gasification and Applied Intelligent Retrieval in Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Tomasz Chmielniak & Leszek Stepien & Marek Sciazko & Wojciech Nowak, 2021. "Effect of Pyrolysis Reactions on Coal and Biomass Gasification Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Samadi, Seyed Hashem & Ghobadian, Barat & Nosrati, Mohsen, 2020. "Prediction and estimation of biomass energy from agricultural residues using air gasification technology in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1077-1091.
    11. Hossain, Md. Uzzal & Poon, Chi Sun & Lo, Irene M.C. & Cheng, Jack C.P., 2017. "Comparative LCA on using waste materials in the cement industry: A Hong Kong case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 199-208.
    12. Wang, Yinglong & Li, Guoxuan & Liu, Zhiqiang & Cui, Peizhe & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Yang, Sheng, 2019. "Techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-hydrogen process in comparison with coal-to-hydrogen process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1063-1075.
    13. Ferreiro, A.I. & Segurado, R. & Costa, M., 2020. "Modelling soot formation during biomass gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    14. Li, Chongcong & Liu, Rui & Zheng, Jinhao & Zhang, Yan, 2023. "Thermodynamic study on the effects of operating parameters on CaO-based sorption enhanced steam gasification of biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    15. Waranya Thepsaskul & Wongkot Wongsapai & Jirakom Sirisrisakulchai & Tassawan Jaitiang & Sopit Daroon & Varoon Raksakulkan & Phitsinee Muangjai & Chaichan Ritkrerkkrai & Pana Suttakul & Gengwit Wattaka, 2023. "Potential Business Models of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) for the Oil Refining Industry in Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-16, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:265:y:2023:i:c:s0360544222031346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.