IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v23y1998i7p533-548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fast reactor designs in the USA: changing goals and options

Author

Listed:
  • Zebroski, Edwin L

Abstract

Liquid metal fast reactor developments in the USA have narrowed to two basic goals: (1) nominally inherently safe modular designs with passive cooling capability and minimum requirements for safety-grade equipment; and (2) an integrated fuel cycle based on pyroprocessing and metal alloy fuel material. The current goals reflect basic departures from the originally conceived incentives and design goals for reactors capable of high neutron efficiencies. The economic, logistic, and institutional changes in the applicable factors that drive the changing goals are reviewed. The paper describes the current technical status and possible strategies for reaching a prototype stage during the next few decades. The key technical developments that appear to make the current goals attractive and feasible are surveyed. Prototypes have operated for several dozen reactor years and have experienced numerous non-nuclear incidents. None of these events appear to pose significant obstacles to the attainment of the safe and reliable operation of fast reactors. The historical developments leading to the current status are summarized in four periods from 1948 to 1993. The main factors discussed include the dramatic changes in the size and dynamics of plutonium and uranium supplies, the improved picture on fossil fuel supplies, and the resulting decline in the near-term cost competitiveness of nuclear options in the USA. The dominant role of public perceptions and the sources of misperceptions are discussed. The effects of federal regulations and litigation have also been very important. The combination of these changing circumstances serve to defer for several decades the potential for realizing the economic value of excess breeding gain. Nevertheless, a path of economically driven near-term and long-term development and deployment is foreseen. The promising near-term path involves the use of modular fast spectrum burner reactors that offer good prospects of achieving good economics near-term. These can also provide vital national security benefits by using their capability for sequestering plutonium from decommissioned nuclear weapons safely.

Suggested Citation

  • Zebroski, Edwin L, 1998. "Fast reactor designs in the USA: changing goals and options," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 23(7), pages 533-548.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:23:y:1998:i:7:p:533-548
    DOI: 10.1016/S0360-5442(97)00098-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544297000984
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S0360-5442(97)00098-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Utgikar, V.P. & Scott, J.P., 2006. "Energy forecasting: Predictions, reality and analysis of causes of error," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(17), pages 3087-3092, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:23:y:1998:i:7:p:533-548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.