IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v214y2021ics0360544220319836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electricity markets for DC distribution systems: Locational pricing trumps wholesale pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Piao, Longjian
  • de Vries, Laurens
  • de Weerdt, Mathijs
  • Yorke-Smith, Neil

Abstract

DC distribution systems are a promising alternative to existing AC distribution systems. They connect customers to local energy sources without conversion, thus reducing power losses. However, the unique features of DC impose strict requirements for system operation compared to AC. Within the context of a liberalized energy market, this article demonstrates three promising market designs—an outcome of a comprehensive engineering design framework—that meet those DC requirements. They are an integrated market design, which incorporates all system costs into energy prices; a market design that passes wholesale energy prices directly to prosumers; and a locational energy market design that relieves congestion with nodal prices. An optimization model estimates the three market designs’ performance by simulating a realistic DC distribution system, featuring a high share of electric vehicles. Results indicate that the integrated market design is optimal in theory but computationally infeasible in practice. The wholesale energy price design aiming at constraint-free energy trading requires substantial investments in flexibility. The locational energy market design yields nearly optimal operation in urban networks and is considered the best feasible market design for DC distribution systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Piao, Longjian & de Vries, Laurens & de Weerdt, Mathijs & Yorke-Smith, Neil, 2021. "Electricity markets for DC distribution systems: Locational pricing trumps wholesale pricing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:214:y:2021:i:c:s0360544220319836
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220319836
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118876?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William E. Hart & Carl D. Laird & Jean-Paul Watson & David L. Woodruff & Gabriel A. Hackebeil & Bethany L. Nicholson & John D. Siirola, 2017. "Pyomo — Optimization Modeling in Python," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-319-58821-6, September.
    2. Wang, Jidong & Wu, Jiahui & Che, Yanbo, 2019. "Agent and system dynamics-based hybrid modeling and simulation for multilateral bidding in electricity market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 444-456.
    3. Silva, Francisco & Teixeira, Brígida & Pinto, Tiago & Santos, Gabriel & Vale, Zita & Praça, Isabel, 2016. "Generation of realistic scenarios for multi-agent simulation of electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 128-139.
    4. Gerard, Helena & Rivero Puente, Enrique Israel & Six, Daan, 2018. "Coordination between transmission and distribution system operators in the electricity sector: A conceptual framework," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 40-48.
    5. Pol Olivella-Rosell & Pau Lloret-Gallego & Íngrid Munné-Collado & Roberto Villafafila-Robles & Andreas Sumper & Stig Ødegaard Ottessen & Jayaprakash Rajasekharan & Bernt A. Bremdal, 2018. "Local Flexibility Market Design for Aggregators Providing Multiple Flexibility Services at Distribution Network Level," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Lu, Xiaoxing & Li, Kangping & Xu, Hanchen & Wang, Fei & Zhou, Zhenyu & Zhang, Yagang, 2020. "Fundamentals and business model for resource aggregator of demand response in electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    7. García-Triviño, Pablo & Torreglosa, Juan P. & Fernández-Ramírez, Luis M. & Jurado, Francisco, 2016. "Control and operation of power sources in a medium-voltage direct-current microgrid for an electric vehicle fast charging station with a photovoltaic and a battery energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 38-48.
    8. Iria, José & Scott, Paul & Attarha, Ahmad, 2020. "Network-constrained bidding optimization strategy for aggregators of prosumers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    9. Bjørndal, Endre & Bjørndal, Mette & Midthun, Kjetil & Tomasgard, Asgeir, 2018. "Stochastic electricity dispatch: A challenge for market design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 992-1005.
    10. Glasgo, Brock & Azevedo, Inês Lima & Hendrickson, Chris, 2016. "How much electricity can we save by using direct current circuits in homes? Understanding the potential for electricity savings and assessing feasibility of a transition towards DC powered buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 66-75.
    11. Longjian Piao & Laurens de Vries & Mathijs de Weerdt & Neil Yorke-Smith, 2019. "Electricity Markets for DC Distribution Systems: Design Options," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    12. Eid, Cherrelle & Bollinger, L. Andrew & Koirala, Binod & Scholten, Daniel & Facchinetti, Emanuele & Lilliestam, Johan & Hakvoort, Rudi, 2016. "Market integration of local energy systems: Is local energy management compatible with European regulation for retail competition?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 913-922.
    13. Ottesen, Stig Ødegaard & Tomasgard, Asgeir & Fleten, Stein-Erik, 2018. "Multi market bidding strategies for demand side flexibility aggregators in electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 120-134.
    14. Jin, Xiaolong & Wu, Qiuwei & Jia, Hongjie, 2020. "Local flexibility markets: Literature review on concepts, models and clearing methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    15. Eid, Cherrelle & Koliou, Elta & Valles, Mercedes & Reneses, Javier & Hakvoort, Rudi, 2016. "Time-based pricing and electricity demand response: Existing barriers and next steps," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 15-25.
    16. Verzijlbergh, Remco & Brancucci Martínez-Anido, Carlo & Lukszo, Zofia & de Vries, Laurens, 2014. "Does controlled electric vehicle charging substitute cross-border transmission capacity?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 169-180.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel & Contente dos Santos Parente, Clara & Leitão, Nuno Carlos & Cantos-Cantos, José María, 2023. "The influence of economic complexity processes and renewable energy on CO2 emissions of BRICS. What about industry 4.0?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kara, Güray & Pisciella, Paolo & Tomasgard, Asgeir & Farahmand, Hossein & Crespo del Granado, Pedro, 2022. "Stochastic local flexibility market design, bidding, and dispatch for distribution grid operations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    2. Domagoj Badanjak & Hrvoje Pandžić, 2021. "Distribution-Level Flexibility Markets—A Review of Trends, Research Projects, Key Stakeholders and Open Questions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-26, October.
    3. Karim L. Anaya & Michael G. Pollitt, 2021. "How to Procure Flexibility Services within the Electricity Distribution System: Lessons from an International Review of Innovation Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    4. Matthew Gough & Sérgio F. Santos & Mohammed Javadi & Rui Castro & João P. S. Catalão, 2020. "Prosumer Flexibility: A Comprehensive State-of-the-Art Review and Scientometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-32, May.
    5. Capper, Timothy & Gorbatcheva, Anna & Mustafa, Mustafa A. & Bahloul, Mohamed & Schwidtal, Jan Marc & Chitchyan, Ruzanna & Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Montakhabi, Mehdi & Scott, Ian J. & Franci, 2022. "Peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy: A systematic literature review of local energy market models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    6. Đorđe Lazović & Željko Đurišić, 2023. "Advanced Flexibility Support through DSO-Coordinated Participation of DER Aggregators in the Balancing Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-26, April.
    7. Iria, José & Scott, Paul & Attarha, Ahmad & Gordon, Dan & Franklin, Evan, 2022. "MV-LV network-secure bidding optimisation of an aggregator of prosumers in real-time energy and reserve markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    8. Silva-Rodriguez, Lina & Sanjab, Anibal & Fumagalli, Elena & Virag, Ana & Gibescu, Madeleine, 2022. "Short term wholesale electricity market designs: A review of identified challenges and promising solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    9. Tsaousoglou, Georgios & Giraldo, Juan S. & Paterakis, Nikolaos G., 2022. "Market Mechanisms for Local Electricity Markets: A review of models, solution concepts and algorithmic techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Lina Silva-Rodriguez & Anibal Sanjab & Elena Fumagalli & Ana Virag & Madeleine Gibescu, 2020. "Short Term Electricity Market Designs: Identified Challenges and Promising Solutions," Papers 2011.04587, arXiv.org.
    11. Hashemipour, Naser & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Aghaei, Jamshid, 2021. "Dynamic allocation of peer-to-peer clusters in virtual local electricity markets: A marketplace for EV flexibility," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    12. Stig Ødegaard Ottesen & Martin Haug & Heidi S. Nygård, 2020. "A Framework for Offering Short-Term Demand-Side Flexibility to a Flexibility Marketplace," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Kara, Güray & Tomasgard, Asgeir & Farahmand, Hossein, 2022. "Characterizing flexibility in power markets and systems," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    14. Wanapinit, Natapon & Thomsen, Jessica & Weidlich, Anke, 2022. "Integrating flexibility provision into operation planning: A generic framework to assess potentials and bid prices of end-users," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    15. Theo Dronne & Fabien Roques & Marcelo Saguan, 2021. "Local Flexibility Markets for Distribution Network Congestion-Management in Center-Western Europe: Which Design for Which Needs?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Thomas Pownall & Iain Soutar & Catherine Mitchell, 2021. "Re-Designing GB’s Electricity Market Design: A Conceptual Framework Which Recognises the Value of Distributed Energy Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, February.
    17. Ussama Assad & Muhammad Arshad Shehzad Hassan & Umar Farooq & Asif Kabir & Muhammad Zeeshan Khan & S. Sabahat H. Bukhari & Zain ul Abidin Jaffri & Judit Oláh & József Popp, 2022. "Smart Grid, Demand Response and Optimization: A Critical Review of Computational Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-36, March.
    18. Pavlos S. Georgilakis, 2020. "Review of Computational Intelligence Methods for Local Energy Markets at the Power Distribution Level to Facilitate the Integration of Distributed Energy Resources: State-of-the-art and Future Researc," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-37, January.
    19. Sulaima, Mohamad Fani & Dahlan, Nofri Yenita & Yasin, Zuhaila Mat & Rosli, Marlinda Mohd & Omar, Zulkiflee & Hassan, Mohammad Yusri, 2019. "A review of electricity pricing in peninsular Malaysia: Empirical investigation about the appropriateness of Enhanced Time of Use (ETOU) electricity tariff," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 348-367.
    20. Marina Bertolini & Gregorio Morosinotto, 2023. "Business Models for Energy Community in the Aggregator Perspective: State of the Art and Research Gaps," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-26, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:214:y:2021:i:c:s0360544220319836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.