IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v17y1989i4p356-369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The potential benefits and costs of an increase in US gasoline tax

Author

Listed:
  • Uri, Noel D.
  • Boyd, Roy

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Uri, Noel D. & Boyd, Roy, 1989. "The potential benefits and costs of an increase in US gasoline tax," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 356-369, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:17:y:1989:i:4:p:356-369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0301-4215(89)90007-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carol Dahl & Mine K. Yücel, 1992. "Energy security: a comparison of protectionist policies," Working Papers 9215, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
    2. Doroodian, K. & Boyd, Roy, 2003. "The linkage between oil price shocks and economic growth with inflation in the presence of technological advances: a CGE model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 989-1006, August.
    3. Roy Boyd & K. Doroodian & Dennis Thornton, 2000. "The Impact of Oil Price Volatility on the Future of the U.S. Economy," Energy & Environment, , vol. 11(1), pages 25-48, January.
    4. Shiau, Ching-Shin Norman & Michalek, Jeremy J. & Hendrickson, Chris T., 2009. "A structural analysis of vehicle design responses to Corporate Average Fuel Economy policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(9-10), pages 814-828, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:17:y:1989:i:4:p:356-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.