IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v84y1995i2p416-430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative analysis of approaches for determining optimal price and order quantity when a sale increases demand

Author

Listed:
  • Ardalan, Alireza

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ardalan, Alireza, 1995. "A comparative analysis of approaches for determining optimal price and order quantity when a sale increases demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 416-430, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:84:y:1995:i:2:p:416-430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0377-2217(93)E0282-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin Lev & Howard J. Weiss, 1990. "Inventory Models with Cost Changes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 53-63, February.
    2. G. Hadley, 1964. "A Comparison of Order Quantities Computed Using the Average Annual Cost and the Discounted Cost," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 472-476, April.
    3. Sam G. Taylor & Charles E. Bradley, 1985. "Optimal Ordering Strategies for Announced Price Increases," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 312-325, April.
    4. Ardalan, Alireza, 1994. "Optimal prices and order quantities when temporary price discounts result in increase in demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 52-61, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. F. J. Arcelus & G. Srinivasan, 2006. "Marketing|inventory interactions in the characterization of retailer response to manufacturer trade deals," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(7), pages 537-547.
    2. Khouja, Moutaz, 2006. "A joint optimal pricing, rebate value, and lot sizing model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 706-723, October.
    3. Joglekar, Prafulla & Lee, Patrick, 1998. "Comments on: A comparative analysis for determining optimal price and order quantity when a sale increases demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 228-241, August.
    4. Alireza Kabirian, 2012. "The economic production and pricing model with lot-size-dependent production cost," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Hsieh, Chung-Chi & Liu, Yu-Te & Wang, Wei-Ming, 2010. "Coordinating ordering and pricing decisions in a two-stage distribution system with price-sensitive demand through short-term discounting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 142-151, November.
    6. Chih-Te Yang & Liang-Yuh Ouyang & Kun-Shan Wu & Hsiu-Feng Yen, 2012. "Optimal ordering policy in response to a temporary sale price when retailer's warehouse capacity is limited," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 26-49.
    7. Ramasesh, Ranga V., 2010. "Lot-sizing decisions under limited-time price incentives: A review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 118-135, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramasesh, Ranga V., 2010. "Lot-sizing decisions under limited-time price incentives: A review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 118-135, June.
    2. Joglekar, Prafulla & Lee, Patrick, 1998. "Comments on: A comparative analysis for determining optimal price and order quantity when a sale increases demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 228-241, August.
    3. Yusen Xia, 2016. "Responding to supplier temporary price discounts in a supply chain through ordering and pricing decisions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 1938-1950, April.
    4. Shaposhnik, Yaron & Herer, Yale T. & Naseraldin, Hussein, 2015. "Optimal ordering for a probabilistic one-time discount," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 803-814.
    5. Tersine, Richard J., 1996. "Economic replenishment strategies for announced price increases," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 266-280, July.
    6. Robert W. Grubbström & Brian G. Kingsman, 2004. "Ordering and Inventory Policies for Step Changes in the Unit Item Cost: A Discounted Cash Flow Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 253-267, February.
    7. Khouja, Moutaz & Park, Sungjune, 2003. "Optimal lot sizing under continuous price decrease," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 539-545, December.
    8. Wei Huang & Vidyadhar G. Kulkarni & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2003. "Optimal EOQ for Announced Price Increases in Infinite Horizon," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 336-339, April.
    9. Su, Yiqiang & Geunes, Joseph, 2012. "Price promotions, operations cost, and profit in a two-stage supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 891-905.
    10. Ben A. Chaouch, 2007. "Inventory control and periodic price discounting campaigns," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 94-108, February.
    11. Gurnani, Haresh, 1996. "Optimal ordering policies in inventory systems with random demand and random deal offerings," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 299-312, December.
    12. Wang, Yunzeng, 2001. "The optimality of myopic stocking policies for systems with decreasing purchasing prices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 153-159, August.
    13. Ramasesh, Ranga V. & Rachamadugu, Ram, 2012. "Evaluating lot-sizing strategies under limited-time price incentives: An efficient lower bound," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 177-182.
    14. Ram Rachamadugu & Ranga Ramasesh, 1994. "Suboptimality of equal lot sizes for finite‐horizon problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(7), pages 1019-1027, December.
    15. Yiju Wang & Hengxia Gao & Wei Xing, 2018. "Optimal replenishment and stocking strategies for inventory mechanism with a dynamically stochastic short-term price discount," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 27-53, January.
    16. Suresha Kharvi & T. P. M. Pakkala & G. Srinivasan, 2019. "Ordering policies under currency risk sharing agreements: a Markov chain approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(3), pages 945-964, September.
    17. Chen, Cheng-Kang & Jo Min, K., 1995. "Optimal inventory and disposal policies in response to a sale," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 17-27, November.
    18. Matsuyama, Keisuke, 2001. "The EOQ-Models modified by introducing discount of purchase price or increase of setup cost," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 83-99, August.
    19. Pinçe, Çerağ, 2021. "Forward Buying and Strategic Stockouts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 118-131.
    20. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Pentico, David W., 2013. "An economic order quantity model with a known price increase and partial backordering," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 516-525.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:84:y:1995:i:2:p:416-430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.