IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v298y2022i1p89-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A branch-and-bound algorithm for the quadratic multiple knapsack problem

Author

Listed:
  • Fleszar, Krzysztof

Abstract

We present a new branch-and-bound algorithm for the Quadratic Multiple Knapsack Problem. A key component of our algorithm is a new upper bound that divides the pairwise item values among individual items, estimates the maximum potential value contributed by each individual item, and calculates the upper bound via a transportation model. A local search is used to adjust the division of pairwise item values in order to improve the upper bound. Reduced costs from the solution of the transportation problem are used to forbid some item-to-knapsack assignments. Information from the upper bound is also used in selecting the item to branch on next. Computational experiments are carried out on three sets of benchmark instances from the literature, two sets of smaller instances with 20–35 items and 3–10 knapsacks per instance, and one set of larger instances with 40–60 items and 3–10 knapsacks per instance. Our algorithm finds and verifies optimal solutions for all small benchmark instances in less than one hour of CPU time apiece and outperforms the best previously proposed algorithms for the problem in terms of both the average computation time and the number of instances for which optimality is verified. For the larger benchmark instances, our algorithm obtains smaller average gaps than the best previously proposed methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Fleszar, Krzysztof, 2022. "A branch-and-bound algorithm for the quadratic multiple knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 89-98.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:298:y:2022:i:1:p:89-98
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.06.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221721005336
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.06.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Galli, Laura & Martello, Silvano & Rey, Carlos & Toth, Paolo, 2021. "Polynomial-size formulations and relaxations for the quadratic multiple knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(3), pages 871-882.
    2. M. Dawande & J. Kalagnanam & P. Keskinocak & F.S. Salman & R. Ravi, 2000. "Approximation Algorithms for the Multiple Knapsack Problem with Assignment Restrictions," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 171-186, June.
    3. David Bergman, 2019. "An Exact Algorithm for the Quadratic Multiknapsack Problem with an Application to Event Seating," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 477-492, July.
    4. Samir Elhedhli & Jean-Louis Goffin, 2005. "Efficient Production-Distribution System Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(7), pages 1151-1164, July.
    5. Peng, Bo & Liu, Mengqi & Lü, Zhipeng & Kochengber, Gary & Wang, Haibo, 2016. "An ejection chain approach for the quadratic multiple knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(2), pages 328-336.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Bergman, 2019. "An Exact Algorithm for the Quadratic Multiknapsack Problem with an Application to Event Seating," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 477-492, July.
    2. Navneet Vidyarthi & Emre Çelebi & Samir Elhedhli & Elizabeth Jewkes, 2007. "Integrated Production-Inventory-Distribution System Design with Risk Pooling: Model Formulation and Heuristic Solution," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 392-408, August.
    3. J. Álvaro Gómez-Pantoja & M. Angélica Salazar-Aguilar & José Luis González-Velarde, 2021. "The food bank resource allocation problem," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(1), pages 266-286, April.
    4. Francisco Castillo-Zunino & Pinar Keskinocak, 2021. "Bi-criteria multiple knapsack problem with grouped items," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 747-789, October.
    5. Elif Akçalı & Alper Üngör & Reha Uzsoy, 2005. "Short‐term capacity allocation problem with tool and setup constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(8), pages 754-764, December.
    6. Yuji Nakagawa & Ross J. W. James & César Rego & Chanaka Edirisinghe, 2014. "Entropy-Based Optimization of Nonlinear Separable Discrete Decision Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 695-707, March.
    7. Stefka Fidanova & Krassimir Todorov Atanassov, 2021. "ACO with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Pheromone Updating Applied on Multiple-Constraint Knapsack Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(13), pages 1-7, June.
    8. Xueqi Wu & Zhi‐Long Chen, 2022. "Fulfillment scheduling for buy‐online‐pickup‐in‐store orders," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 2982-3003, July.
    9. Wu, Tao & Xiao, Fan & Zhang, Canrong & Zhang, Defu & Liang, Zhe, 2019. "Regression and extrapolation guided optimization for production–distribution with ship–buy–exchange options," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 15-37.
    10. Tilk, Christian & Drexl, Michael & Irnich, Stefan, 2019. "Nested branch-and-price-and-cut for vehicle routing problems with multiple resource interdependencies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 549-565.
    11. Sheu, Jiuh Biing & Kundu, Tanmoy, 2018. "Forecasting time-varying logistics distribution flows in the One Belt-One Road strategic context," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 5-22.
    12. Mohammad R. Oskoorouchi & Hamid R. Ghaffari & Tamás Terlaky & Dionne M. Aleman, 2011. "An Interior Point Constraint Generation Algorithm for Semi-Infinite Optimization with Health-Care Application," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1184-1197, October.
    13. Jinwen Ou & Xueling Zhong & Xiangtong Qi, 2016. "Scheduling parallel machines with inclusive processing set restrictions and job rejection," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(8), pages 667-681, December.
    14. Saharnaz Mehrani & Carlos Cardonha & David Bergman, 2022. "Models and Algorithms for the Bin-Packing Problem with Minimum Color Fragmentation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 1070-1085, March.
    15. Hans Kellerer & Joseph Y.‐T. Leung & Chung‐Lun Li, 2011. "Multiple subset sum with inclusive assignment set restrictions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(6), pages 546-563, September.
    16. Lixin Tang & Ying Meng & Zhi-Long Chen & Jiyin Liu, 2016. "Coil Batching to Improve Productivity and Energy Utilization in Steel Production," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 262-279, May.
    17. Morteza Abbasi & Reza Hosnavi & Mehrdad Mohammadi, 2013. "Designing a Fuzzy Strategic Integrated Multiechelon Agile Supply Chain Network," Journal of Optimization, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-16, June.
    18. F. Jolai & J. Razmi & N. Rostami, 2011. "A fuzzy goal programming and meta heuristic algorithms for solving integrated production: distribution planning problem," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 19(4), pages 547-569, December.
    19. Cardona-Valdés, Y. & Álvarez, A. & Pacheco, J., 2014. "Metaheuristic procedure for a bi-objective supply chain design problem with uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 66-84.
    20. Homsi, Gabriel & Jordan, Jeremy & Martello, Silvano & Monaci, Michele, 2021. "The assignment and loading transportation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(3), pages 999-1007.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:298:y:2022:i:1:p:89-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.