IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v257y2017i1p25-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regenerator location problem: Polyhedral study and effective branch-and-cut algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Xiangyong
  • Aneja, Y.P.

Abstract

In this paper, we study the regenerator location problem (RLP). This problem arises in optical networks where an optical signal can only travel a certain maximum distance (called the optical reach) before its quality deteriorates, needing regenerations by regenerators deployed at network nodes. The RLP is to determine a minimal number of network nodes for regenerator placement, such that for each node pair, there exists a path of which no sub-path without internal regenerators has a length greater than the optical reach. Starting with a set covering formulation involving an exponential number of constraints, reported and studied in Rahman (2012) and Aneja (2012), we study the facial structure of the polytope arising from this formulation, significantly extending known results. Making use of these polyhedral results, we present a new branch-and-cut (B&C) solution approach to solve the RLP to optimality. We present a series of computational experiments to evaluate two versions of the proposed B&C approach. Over 400 benchmark RLP instances, we first compare them with an available exact method for the RLP in the literature. Because of the equivalence among the RLP, the minimum connected dominating set problem (MCDSP), and the maximum leaf spanning tree problem (MLSTP), we further compare our approaches with other available exact algorithms using 47 benchmark MCDSP/MLSTP instances.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Xiangyong & Aneja, Y.P., 2017. "Regenerator location problem: Polyhedral study and effective branch-and-cut algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 25-40.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:257:y:2017:i:1:p:25-40
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221716305690
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abilio Lucena & Nelson Maculan & Luidi Simonetti, 2010. "Reformulations and solution algorithms for the maximum leaf spanning tree problem," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 289-311, July.
    2. Gendron, Bernard & Scutellà, Maria Grazia & Garroppo, Rosario G. & Nencioni, Gianfranco & Tavanti, Luca, 2016. "A branch-and-Benders-cut method for nonlinear power design in green wireless local area networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(1), pages 151-162.
    3. Yogesh Agarwal & Yash Aneja, 2012. "Fixed-Charge Transportation Problem: Facets of the Projection Polyhedron," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 638-654, June.
    4. Si Chen & Ivana Ljubić & S. Raghavan, 2015. "The Generalized Regenerator Location Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 204-220, May.
    5. Bala G. Chandran & Dorit S. Hochbaum, 2009. "A Computational Study of the Pseudoflow and Push-Relabel Algorithms for the Maximum Flow Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 358-376, April.
    6. Pedrola, Oscar & Careglio, Davide & Klinkowski, Miroslaw & Velasco, Luis & Bergman, Keren & Solé-Pareta, Josep, 2013. "Metaheuristic hybridizations for the regenerator placement and dimensioning problem in sub-wavelength switching optical networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(3), pages 614-624.
    7. Dorit S. Hochbaum, 2008. "The Pseudoflow Algorithm: A New Algorithm for the Maximum-Flow Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 992-1009, August.
    8. Bernard Gendron & Abilio Lucena & Alexandre Salles da Cunha & Luidi Simonetti, 2014. "Benders Decomposition, Branch-and-Cut, and Hybrid Algorithms for the Minimum Connected Dominating Set Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 645-657, November.
    9. Buchanan, Austin & Sung, Je Sang & Boginski, Vladimir & Butenko, Sergiy, 2014. "On connected dominating sets of restricted diameter," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 410-418.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiangyong Li & Y. P. Aneja, 2020. "A new branch-and-cut approach for the generalized regenerator location problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(1), pages 229-255, December.
    2. Hamidreza Validi & Austin Buchanan, 2020. "The Optimal Design of Low-Latency Virtual Backbones," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 952-967, October.
    3. Okan Arslan & Oya Ekin Karaşan & Ridha Mahjoub & Hande Yaman, 2019. "A Branch-and-Cut Algorithm for the Alternative Fuel Refueling Station Location Problem with Routing," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 1107-1125, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hamidreza Validi & Austin Buchanan, 2020. "The Optimal Design of Low-Latency Virtual Backbones," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 952-967, October.
    2. Markus Leitner & Ivana Ljubić & Martin Riedler & Mario Ruthmair, 2019. "Exact Approaches for Network Design Problems with Relays," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 171-192, February.
    3. Austin Buchanan & Je Sang Sung & Sergiy Butenko & Eduardo L. Pasiliao, 2015. "An Integer Programming Approach for Fault-Tolerant Connected Dominating Sets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 178-188, February.
    4. Xiangyong Li & Y. P. Aneja, 2020. "A new branch-and-cut approach for the generalized regenerator location problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(1), pages 229-255, December.
    5. Renaud Chicoisne & Daniel Espinoza & Marcos Goycoolea & Eduardo Moreno & Enrique Rubio, 2012. "A New Algorithm for the Open-Pit Mine Production Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 517-528, June.
    6. Yıldız, Barış & Karaşan, Oya Ekin, 2015. "Regenerator Location Problem and survivable extensions: A hub covering location perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 32-55.
    7. Xinyun Wu & Zhipeng Lü & Fred Glover, 2022. "A Fast Vertex Weighting-Based Local Search for Finding Minimum Connected Dominating Sets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 817-833, March.
    8. Sourour Elloumi & Olivier Hudry & Estel Marie & Agathe Martin & Agnès Plateau & Stéphane Rovedakis, 2021. "Optimization of wireless sensor networks deployment with coverage and connectivity constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 183-206, March.
    9. Enrique Jelvez & Nelson Morales & Julian M. Ortiz, 2021. "Stochastic Final Pit Limits: An Efficient Frontier Analysis under Geological Uncertainty in the Open-Pit Mining Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Barış Yıldız & Oya Ekin Karaşan, 2017. "Regenerator Location Problem in Flexible Optical Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 595-620, June.
    11. Amina Lamghari & Roussos Dimitrakopoulos & Jacques Ferland, 2015. "A hybrid method based on linear programming and variable neighborhood descent for scheduling production in open-pit mines," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 555-582, November.
    12. Armin Fügenschuh & Marzena Fügenschuh, 2008. "Integer linear programming models for topology optimization in sheet metal design," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 68(2), pages 313-331, October.
    13. Clavijo López, Christian & Crama, Yves & Pironet, Thierry & Semet, Frédéric, 2024. "Multi-period distribution networks with purchase commitment contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 556-572.
    14. Vic Grout, 2017. "A Simple Approach to Dynamic Optimisation of Flexible Optical Networks with Practical Application," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-11, May.
    15. Moreno, Alfredo & Munari, Pedro & Alem, Douglas, 2019. "A branch-and-Benders-cut algorithm for the Crew Scheduling and Routing Problem in road restoration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 16-34.
    16. Nancel-Penard, Pierre & Morales, Nelson & Cornillier, Fabien, 2022. "A recursive time aggregation-disaggregation heuristic for the multidimensional and multiperiod precedence-constrained knapsack problem: An application to the open-pit mine block sequencing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1088-1099.
    17. Yiyong Xiao & Abdullah Konak, 2017. "A variable neighborhood search for the network design problem with relays," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 137-164, June.
    18. Das, Ranajit & Topal, Erkan & Mardaneh, Elham, 2023. "A review of open pit mine and waste dump schedule planning," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    19. Jélvez, Enrique & Morales, Nelson & Nancel-Penard, Pierre & Cornillier, Fabien, 2020. "A new hybrid heuristic algorithm for the Precedence Constrained Production Scheduling Problem: A mining application," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    20. Gonzalo Muñoz & Daniel Espinoza & Marcos Goycoolea & Eduardo Moreno & Maurice Queyranne & Orlando Rivera Letelier, 2018. "A study of the Bienstock–Zuckerberg algorithm: applications in mining and resource constrained project scheduling," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 501-534, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:257:y:2017:i:1:p:25-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.