IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v256y2017i3p696-712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two decomposition algorithms for solving a minimum weight maximum clique model for the air conflict resolution problem

Author

Listed:
  • Lehouillier, Thibault
  • Omer, Jérémy
  • Soumis, François
  • Desaulniers, Guy

Abstract

In this paper, we tackle the conflict resolution problem using a new variant of the minimum-weight maximum-clique model. The problem involves identifying maneuvers that maintain the required separation distance between all pairs of a set of aircraft while minimizing fuel costs. We design a graph in which the vertices correspond to a finite set of maneuvers and the edges connect conflict-free maneuvers. A maximum clique of minimal weight yields a conflict-free situation that involves all the aircraft and minimizes the costs induced. The model uses a different cost structure compared to classical clique search problems: the costs of the vertices cannot be determined a priori, since they depend on the vertices in the clique. We formulate the problem as a mixed integer linear program. Since the modeling of the aircraft dynamics and the computation of trajectories is separated from the solution process, our mathematical framework is valid for any hypotheses on the aircraft dynamics and any choice of the available maneuvers. In particular, the aircraft can perform dynamic velocity, heading, and flight-level changes. To solve instances involving a large number of aircraft spread over several flight levels, we introduce two decomposition algorithms. The first is a sequential mixed integer linear programming procedure that iteratively refines the discretization of the maneuvers to yield a trade-off between computational time and cost. The second is a large neighborhood search heuristic that uses the first procedure as a subroutine. The best solutions for the available set of maneuvers are obtained in less than ten seconds for instances with up to 250 aircraft randomly allocated to bisten flight levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Lehouillier, Thibault & Omer, Jérémy & Soumis, François & Desaulniers, Guy, 2017. "Two decomposition algorithms for solving a minimum weight maximum clique model for the air conflict resolution problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 696-712.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:256:y:2017:i:3:p:696-712
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221716305458
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Qinghua & Hao, Jin-Kao, 2015. "A review on algorithms for maximum clique problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 693-709.
    2. Dimitris Bertsimas & Sarah Stock Patterson, 2000. "The Traffic Flow Management Rerouting Problem in Air Traffic Control: A Dynamic Network Flow Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 239-255, August.
    3. Nicolas Barnier & Pascal Brisset, 2004. "Graph Coloring for Air Traffic Flow Management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 163-178, August.
    4. Dimitris Bertsimas & Sarah Stock Patterson, 1998. "The Air Traffic Flow Management Problem with Enroute Capacities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 406-422, June.
    5. Hanif D. Sherali & J. Cole Smith & Antonio A. Trani, 2002. "An Airspace Planning Model for Selecting Flight-plans Under Workload, Safety, and Equity Considerations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 378-397, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thibault Lehouillier & Moncef Ilies Nasri & François Soumis & Guy Desaulniers & Jérémy Omer, 2017. "Solving the Air Conflict Resolution Problem Under Uncertainty Using an Iterative Biobjective Mixed Integer Programming Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 1242-1258, November.
    2. Dias, Fernando H.C. & Hijazi, Hassan & Rey, David, 2022. "Disjunctive linear separation conditions and mixed-integer formulations for aircraft conflict resolution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 520-538.
    3. Yanchao Liu, 2019. "A Progressive Motion-Planning Algorithm and Traffic Flow Analysis for High-Density 2D Traffic," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 1501-1525, November.
    4. Cafieri, Sonia & Conn, Andrew R. & Mongeau, Marcel, 2023. "Mixed-integer nonlinear and continuous optimization formulations for aircraft conflict avoidance via heading and speed deviations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 670-679.
    5. Mercedes Pelegrín & Martina Cerulli, 2023. "Aircraft Conflict Resolution: A Benchmark Generator," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 274-285, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhe Liang & Wanpracha Art Chaovalitwongse & Elsayed A. Elsayed, 2014. "Sequence Assignment Model for the Flight Conflict Resolution Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 334-350, August.
    2. Dal Sasso, Veronica & Djeumou Fomeni, Franklin & Lulli, Guglielmo & Zografos, Konstantinos G., 2018. "Incorporating Stakeholders’ priorities and preferences in 4D trajectory optimization," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 594-609.
    3. Thomas W. M. Vossen & Michael O. Ball, 2006. "Slot Trading Opportunities in Collaborative Ground Delay Programs," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 29-43, February.
    4. Hanif D. Sherali & J. Cole Smith & Antonio A. Trani, 2002. "An Airspace Planning Model for Selecting Flight-plans Under Workload, Safety, and Equity Considerations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 378-397, November.
    5. Murça, Mayara Condé Rocha, 2018. "Collaborative air traffic flow management: Incorporating airline preferences in rerouting decisions," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 97-107.
    6. Dixit, Aasheesh & Jakhar, Suresh Kumar, 2021. "Airport capacity management: A review and bibliometric analysis," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Mukherjee, Avijit, 2004. "Dynamic Stochastic Optimization Models for Air Traffic Flow Management," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2vk8w6nc, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    8. Hanif D. Sherali & Raymond W. Staats & Antonio A. Trani, 2003. "An Airspace Planning and Collaborative Decision-Making Model: Part I—Probabilistic Conflicts, Workload, and Equity Considerations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 434-456, November.
    9. Diao, Xudong & Chen, Chun-Hsien, 2018. "A sequence model for air traffic flow management rerouting problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 15-30.
    10. Lorenzo Castelli & Paola Pellegrini & Raffaele Pesenti, 2012. "Airport slot allocation in Europe: economic efficiency and fairness," International Journal of Revenue Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1/2), pages 28-44.
    11. Guglielmo Lulli & Amedeo Odoni, 2007. "The European Air Traffic Flow Management Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 431-443, November.
    12. Bolić, Tatjana & Castelli, Lorenzo & Corolli, Luca & Rigonat, Desirée, 2017. "Reducing ATFM delays through strategic flight planning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 42-59.
    13. Agustı´n, A. & Alonso-Ayuso, A. & Escudero, L.F. & Pizarro, C., 2012. "On air traffic flow management with rerouting. Part I: Deterministic case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 156-166.
    14. Wei, P. & Cao, Y. & Sun, D., 2013. "Total unimodularity and decomposition method for large-scale air traffic cell transmission model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-16.
    15. Dimitris Bertsimas & Shubham Gupta, 2016. "Fairness and Collaboration in Network Air Traffic Flow Management: An Optimization Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 57-76, February.
    16. Bolić, Tatjana & Castelli, Lorenzo & Corolli, Luca & Scaini, Giovanni, 2021. "Flexibility in strategic flight planning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    17. Dimitris Bertsimas & Guglielmo Lulli & Amedeo Odoni, 2011. "An Integer Optimization Approach to Large-Scale Air Traffic Flow Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 211-227, February.
    18. Agustı´n, A. & Alonso-Ayuso, A. & Escudero, L.F. & Pizarro, C., 2012. "On air traffic flow management with rerouting. Part II: Stochastic case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 167-177.
    19. Balázs Kotnyek & Octavio Richetta, 2006. "Equitable Models for the Stochastic Ground-Holding Problem Under Collaborative Decision Making," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 133-146, May.
    20. Sun, D. & Clinet, A. & Bayen, A.M., 2011. "A dual decomposition method for sector capacity constrained traffic flow optimization," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 880-902, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:256:y:2017:i:3:p:696-712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.