IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v206y2010i3p522-527.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A mixed integer linear programming formulation of the maximum betweenness problem

Author

Listed:
  • Savic, Aleksandar
  • Kratica, Jozef
  • Milanovic, Marija
  • Dugosija, Djordje

Abstract

This paper considers the maximum betweenness problem. A new mixed integer linear programming (MILP) formulation is presented and validity of this formulation is given. Experimental results are performed on randomly generated instances from the literature. The results of CPLEX solver, based on the proposed MILP formulation, are compared with results obtained by total enumeration technique. The results show that CPLEX optimally solves instances of up to 30 elements and 60 triples in a short period of time.

Suggested Citation

  • Savic, Aleksandar & Kratica, Jozef & Milanovic, Marija & Dugosija, Djordje, 2010. "A mixed integer linear programming formulation of the maximum betweenness problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 522-527, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:206:y:2010:i:3:p:522-527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(10)00159-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hertz, Alain & Lahrichi, Nadia & Widmer, Marino, 2010. "A flexible MILP model for multiple-shift workforce planning under annualized hours," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 860-873, February.
    2. Caumond, A. & Lacomme, P. & Moukrim, A. & Tchernev, N., 2009. "An MILP for scheduling problems in an FMS with one vehicle," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(3), pages 706-722, December.
    3. Conde, Eduardo, 2009. "A minmax regret approach to the critical path method with task interval times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 235-242, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arash Amirteimoori & Reza Kia, 2023. "Concurrent scheduling of jobs and AGVs in a flexible job shop system: a parallel hybrid PSO-GA meta-heuristic," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 727-753, September.
    2. Sun, Yige & Chung, Sai-Ho & Wen, Xin & Ma, Hoi-Lam, 2021. "Novel robotic job-shop scheduling models with deadlock and robot movement considerations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    3. Lagodimos, A.G. & Mihiotis, A.N., 2010. "Efficient overtime planning in packing shops with lines of identical manning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 453-462, April.
    4. Van den Bergh, Jorne & Beliën, Jeroen & De Bruecker, Philippe & Demeulemeester, Erik & De Boeck, Liesje, 2013. "Personnel scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 367-385.
    5. Öncü Hazir & Gündüz Ulusoy, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," Post-Print hal-02898162, HAL.
    6. Philippe Lacomme & Aziz Moukrim & Alain Quilliot & Marina Vinot, 2019. "Integration of routing into a resource-constrained project scheduling problem," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 7(4), pages 421-464, December.
    7. Conde, Eduardo, 2012. "On a constant factor approximation for minmax regret problems using a symmetry point scenario," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 452-457.
    8. Hazır, Öncü & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    9. Corominas, Albert & Lusa, Amaia & Olivella, Jordi, 2012. "A detailed workforce planning model including non-linear dependence of capacity on the size of the staff and cash management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 445-458.
    10. Marie-Laure Espinouse & Grzegorz Pawlak & Malgorzata Sterna, 2017. "Complexity of Scheduling Problem in Single-Machine Flexible Manufacturing System with Cyclic Transportation and Unlimited Buffers," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 1042-1054, June.
    11. Egbert Veen & Erwin Hans & Bart Veltman & Leo Berrevoets & Hubert Berden, 2015. "A case study of cost-efficient staffing under annualized hours," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 279-288, September.
    12. Minh Phuoc Doan & Julien Fondrevelle & Valérie Botta-Genoulaz & Jose Francisco Ferreira Ribeiro, 2022. "Impact of flexible work contracts and multi-skilled agents on a multi-objective workforce planning problem," Post-Print hal-03119408, HAL.
    13. Olatunde T. Baruwa & Miquel A. Piera, 2016. "A coloured Petri net-based hybrid heuristic search approach to simultaneous scheduling of machines and automated guided vehicles," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(16), pages 4773-4792, August.
    14. Lin, Shih-Wei & Ying, Kuo-Ching, 2014. "Minimizing shifts for personnel task scheduling problems: A three-phase algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(1), pages 323-334.
    15. Lacomme, Philippe & Larabi, Mohand & Tchernev, Nikolay, 2013. "Job-shop based framework for simultaneous scheduling of machines and automated guided vehicles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 24-34.
    16. Topal, Erkan & Ramazan, Salih, 2010. "A new MIP model for mine equipment scheduling by minimizing maintenance cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 1065-1071, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:206:y:2010:i:3:p:522-527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.