IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v388y2018icp1-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of pseudo-absence selection method on transferability of species distribution models in the context of non-adaptive niche shift

Author

Listed:
  • Liang, Wanwan
  • Papeş, Monica
  • Tran, Liem
  • Grant, Jerome
  • Washington-Allen, Robert
  • Stewart, Scott
  • Wiggins, Gregory

Abstract

Transferability of species distribution models (SDMs) is key to predicting invasion patterns and can be challenged if niche shift occurs in the invaded range. When using native occurrences to estimate potential invasions with presence-only modeling methods, it is important to constrain the pseudo-absence (PA) sampling to the species’ native range. However, some studies including highly cited ones, do not follow this approach to selecting PA samples. In this research, we addressed two questions using an invasive species in the United States (U.S.), kudzu bug (Megacopta cribraria): 1) is model transferability challenged by a non-adaptive niche shift? and 2) is model performance affected by use of PA samples from outside the native range of the species? Kudzu bug is native to Asia, with recently observed non-adaptive niche shift in the U.S. To answer the first question, we quantified the environmental space anisotropy and non-adaptive niche change, and then evaluated the performances of seven SDMs. To answer the second question, we further compared the interpolation and transferability of seven SDMs trained with PAs from the native range and from both native and invaded ranges. We confirmed that the environmental space anisotropy (P = 0.01) and non-adaptive niche change (P = 0.01) are both statistically significant. Of the seven SDMs used, four models had transferability indices higher than 0.9. Boosted regression tree and random forests both had good interpolation and transferability (AUC>0.80 and kappa>0.60), whereas three other models showed good interpolation and fair transferability (AUC>0.70 and kappa>0.40). Inclusion of pseudo-absences from the invaded range significantly increased the interpolation (P < 0.001) but decreased the transferability (P < 0.01) of almost all models. Our findings suggest that SDMs can show good transferability with non-adaptive niche shift, thus native occurrence information should be used in similar situation. We confirmed that it is crucial to constrain the PAs to the same spatial range as presences to accurately model potential invasions.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang, Wanwan & Papeş, Monica & Tran, Liem & Grant, Jerome & Washington-Allen, Robert & Stewart, Scott & Wiggins, Gregory, 2018. "The effect of pseudo-absence selection method on transferability of species distribution models in the context of non-adaptive niche shift," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 388(C), pages 1-9.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:388:y:2018:i:c:p:1-9
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.09.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380018303156
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.09.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ,, 1999. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(5), pages 777-788, October.
    2. ,, 1999. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 151-160, February.
    3. Gengping Zhu & Matthew J Petersen & Wenjun Bu, 2012. "Selecting Biological Meaningful Environmental Dimensions of Low Discrepancy among Ranges to Predict Potential Distribution of Bean Plataspid Invasion," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-9, September.
    4. ,, 1999. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 427-432, June.
    5. Stokland, Jogeir N. & Halvorsen, Rune & Støa, Bente, 2011. "Species distribution modelling—Effect of design and sample size of pseudo-absence observations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(11), pages 1800-1809.
    6. ,, 1999. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 629-637, August.
    7. VanDerWal, Jeremy & Shoo, Luke P. & Graham, Catherine & Williams, Stephen E., 2009. "Selecting pseudo-absence data for presence-only distribution modeling: How far should you stray from what you know?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(4), pages 589-594.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Coro, Gianpaolo & Pagano, Pasquale & Ellenbroek, Anton, 2013. "Combining simulated expert knowledge with Neural Networks to produce Ecological Niche Models for Latimeria chalumnae," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 268(C), pages 55-63.
    2. Saupe, E.E. & Barve, V. & Myers, C.E. & Soberón, J. & Barve, N. & Hensz, C.M. & Peterson, A.T. & Owens, H.L. & Lira-Noriega, A., 2012. "Variation in niche and distribution model performance: The need for a priori assessment of key causal factors," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 237, pages 11-22.
    3. Stokland, Jogeir N. & Halvorsen, Rune & Støa, Bente, 2011. "Species distribution modelling—Effect of design and sample size of pseudo-absence observations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(11), pages 1800-1809.
    4. Giovanelli, João G.R. & de Siqueira, Marinez Ferreira & Haddad, Célio F.B. & Alexandrino, João, 2010. "Modeling a spatially restricted distribution in the Neotropics: How the size of calibration area affects the performance of five presence-only methods," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 215-224.
    5. Senait D Senay & Susan P Worner & Takayoshi Ikeda, 2013. "Novel Three-Step Pseudo-Absence Selection Technique for Improved Species Distribution Modelling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Hengl, Tomislav & Sierdsema, Henk & Radović, Andreja & Dilo, Arta, 2009. "Spatial prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence-only records: combining point pattern analysis, ENFA and regression-kriging," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(24), pages 3499-3511.
    7. Krzysztof S. Targiel & Maciej Nowak & Tadeusz Trzaskalik, 2018. "Scheduling non-critical activities using multicriteria approach," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(3), pages 585-598, September.
    8. F. Castro-Llanos & G. Hyman & J. Rubiano & J. Ramirez-Villegas & H. Achicanoy, 2019. "Climate change favors rice production at higher elevations in Colombia," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 1401-1430, December.
    9. Okitonyumbe Y.F., Joseph & Ulungu, Berthold E.-L., 2013. "Nouvelle caractérisation des solutions efficaces des problèmes d’optimisation combinatoire multi-objectif [New characterization of efficient solution in multi-objective combinatorial optimization]," MPRA Paper 66123, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Amit Kumar & Anila Gupta, 2013. "Mehar’s methods for fuzzy assignment problems with restrictions," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 27-44, March.
    11. Monica Motta & Caterina Sartori, 2020. "Normality and Nondegeneracy of the Maximum Principle in Optimal Impulsive Control Under State Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 44-71, April.
    12. Zhang, Quanzhong & Wei, Haiyan & Liu, Jing & Zhao, Zefang & Ran, Qiao & Gu, Wei, 2021. "A Bayesian network with fuzzy mathematics for species habitat suitability analysis: A case with limited Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 450(C).
    13. Chenchen Wu & Dachuan Xu & Donglei Du & Wenqing Xu, 2016. "An approximation algorithm for the balanced Max-3-Uncut problem using complex semidefinite programming rounding," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1017-1035, November.
    14. Gengping Zhu & Matthew J Petersen & Wenjun Bu, 2012. "Selecting Biological Meaningful Environmental Dimensions of Low Discrepancy among Ranges to Predict Potential Distribution of Bean Plataspid Invasion," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-9, September.
    15. Uzma Ashraf & Hassan Ali & Muhammad Nawaz Chaudry & Irfan Ashraf & Adila Batool & Zafeer Saqib, 2016. "Predicting the Potential Distribution of Olea ferruginea in Pakistan incorporating Climate Change by Using Maxent Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-11, July.
    16. Ernst Althaus & Felix Rauterberg & Sarah Ziegler, 2020. "Computing Euclidean Steiner trees over segments," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(3), pages 309-325, October.
    17. World Bank, 2003. "Argentina : Reforming Policies and Institutions for Efficiency and Equity of Public Expenditures," World Bank Publications - Reports 14637, The World Bank Group.
    18. Ceretani, Andrea N. & Salva, Natalia N. & Tarzia, Domingo A., 2018. "Approximation of the modified error function," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 607-617.
    19. Parihar, Amit Kumar Singh & Hammer, Thomas & Sridhar, G., 2015. "Development and testing of tube type wet ESP for the removal of particulate matter and tar from producer gas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 875-883.
    20. Brown, Jeffrey R., 2001. "Private pensions, mortality risk, and the decision to annuitize," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 29-62, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:388:y:2018:i:c:p:1-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.