IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v374y2018icp37-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) movement and egg-laying with a spatially-explicit agent-based model: The role of monarch perceptual range and spatial memory

Author

Listed:
  • Grant, Tyler J.
  • Parry, Hazel R.
  • Zalucki, Myron P.
  • Bradbury, Steven P.

Abstract

An ∼80% decline in the eastern population of the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) has prompted conservation efforts to increase summer reproductive success in the Midwest United States. Implementation of conservation practices will create a patchwork of milkweed (mainly Asclepias spp.) habitat within agricultural landscapes dominated by corn and soybean production. Since the monarch butterfly is a vagile species, reproductive success is, in part, a function of both the amount and spatial arrangement of habitat patches in a fragmented landscape. To inform conservation planning we developed a spatially-explicit, agent-based model for summer breeding, non-migratory female monarch butterfly movement and egg-laying on an Iowa, USA landscape. Our model employs a unique movement algorithm when monarch agents encounter habitat edges that incorporates monarch perceptual range to their host plant and spatial memory of previously visited habitat. These behavioral factors are rarely incorporated into animal movement algorithms; however, they can influence estimates of resource utilization. Model exploration assessed the distribution and density of eggs laid on a spatially-explicit 148,665 ha landscape comprised of 17 land cover classes with varying milkweed densities. Uncertainty analysis was undertaken by sampling 25 combinations of perceptual range, spatial memory, flight step length and flight directionality parameters from a total of 256 (44) possible combinations. Movement paths simulated with our new movement algorithm show preferential use of high density milkweed areas that would not be simulated using a correlated random walk. Increasing perceptual range caused a decrease in the area used by monarch agents and caused a skewed egg distribution where most eggs were laid in relatively few habitat patches. Increasing spatial memory caused an increase in the area used but decreased the median number of eggs laid in roadside habitat. Current national and regional monarch conservation goals assume a uniform distribution of milkweed in different land cover classes. Translating these goals into spatially-explicit, heterogeneous habitat patches is essential for predicting realized fecundity in the landscape. Our model provides the foundation to link national and regional monarch conservation goals to fine scale spatial configurations of habitat patches in defined landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Grant, Tyler J. & Parry, Hazel R. & Zalucki, Myron P. & Bradbury, Steven P., 2018. "Predicting monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) movement and egg-laying with a spatially-explicit agent-based model: The role of monarch perceptual range and spatial memory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 374(C), pages 37-50.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:374:y:2018:i:c:p:37-50
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.02.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380018300644
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.02.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parry, H.R. & Paull, C.A. & Zalucki, M.P. & Ives, A.R. & Hulthen, A. & Schellhorn, N.A., 2017. "Estimating the landscape distribution of eggs by Helicoverpa spp., with implications for Bt resistance management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 365(C), pages 129-140.
    2. Wallentin, Gudrun, 2017. "Spatial simulation: A spatial perspective on individual-based ecology—a review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 350(C), pages 30-41.
    3. Jan C. Thiele & Winfried Kurth & Volker Grimm, 2014. "Facilitating Parameter Estimation and Sensitivity Analysis of Agent-Based Models: A Cookbook Using NetLogo and 'R'," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 17(3), pages 1-11.
    4. Grimm, Volker & Berger, Uta & DeAngelis, Donald L. & Polhill, J. Gary & Giske, Jarl & Railsback, Steven F., 2010. "The ODD protocol: A review and first update," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(23), pages 2760-2768.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiesta Thakur & Terrance Hurley, 2023. "Do farmers need to be paid to grow milkweed for monarchs or will they volunteer if it is easy enough?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 1008-1024, June.
    2. Evans, Luke C. & Sibly, Richard M. & Thorbek, Pernille & Sims, Ian & Oliver, Tom H. & Walters, Richard J., 2019. "Quantifying the effectiveness of agri-environment schemes for a grassland butterfly using individual-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 411(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Troost, Christian & Huber, Robert & Bell, Andrew R. & van Delden, Hedwig & Filatova, Tatiana & Le, Quang Bao & Lippe, Melvin & Niamir, Leila & Polhill, J. Gareth & Sun, Zhanli & Berger, Thomas, 2023. "How to keep it adequate: A protocol for ensuring validity in agent-based simulation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 159, pages 1-21.
    2. Chudzińska, Magda & Ayllón, Daniel & Madsen, Jesper & Nabe-Nielsen, Jacob, 2016. "Discriminating between possible foraging decisions using pattern-oriented modelling: The case of pink-footed geese in Mid-Norway during their spring migration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 299-315.
    3. Halsey, Samniqueka J. & Miller, James R., 2018. "A spatial agent-based model of the disease vector Ixodes scapularis to explore host-tick associations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 387(C), pages 96-106.
    4. Stenglein, Jennifer L. & Gilbert, Jonathan H. & Wydeven, Adrian P. & Van Deelen, Timothy R., 2015. "An individual-based model for southern Lake Superior wolves: A tool to explore the effect of human-caused mortality on a landscape of risk," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 302(C), pages 13-24.
    5. Yi Tang & Mingyu Liu & Zhanli Sun, 2020. "Indirect Effects of Grazing on Wind-Dispersed Elm Seeds in Sparse Woodlands of Northern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Yoak, Andrew J. & Reece, John F. & Gehrt, Stanley D. & Hamilton, Ian M., 2016. "Optimizing free-roaming dog control programs using agent-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 341(C), pages 53-61.
    7. de Jager, Monique & Hengeveld, Geerten M. & Mooij, Wolf M. & Slooten, Elisabeth, 2019. "Modelling the spatial dynamics of Maui dolphins using individual-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 402(C), pages 59-65.
    8. Boeing, Geoff, 2018. "The Effects of Inequality, Density, and Heterogeneous Residential Preferences on Urban Displacement and Metropolitan Structure: An Agent-Based Model," SocArXiv mkq7d, Center for Open Science.
    9. Evans, Luke C. & Sibly, Richard M. & Thorbek, Pernille & Sims, Ian & Oliver, Tom H. & Walters, Richard J., 2019. "Quantifying the effectiveness of agri-environment schemes for a grassland butterfly using individual-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 411(C).
    10. Fust, Pascal & Schlecht, Eva, 2018. "Integrating spatio-temporal variation in resource availability and herbivore movements into rangeland management: RaMDry—An agent-based model on livestock feeding ecology in a dynamic, heterogeneous, ," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 369(C), pages 13-41.
    11. Lisa Huber & Nico Bahro & Georg Leitinger & Ulrike Tappeiner & Ulrich Strasser, 2019. "Agent-Based Modelling of a Coupled Water Demand and Supply System at the Catchment Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Lorscheid, Iris & Meyer, Matthias, 2016. "Divide and conquer: Configuring submodels for valid and efficient analyses of complex simulation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 152-161.
    13. Ayllón, Daniel & Railsback, Steven F. & Vincenzi, Simone & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Almodóvar, Ana & Grimm, Volker, 2016. "InSTREAM-Gen: Modelling eco-evolutionary dynamics of trout populations under anthropogenic environmental change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 36-53.
    14. Medeiros-Sousa, Antônio Ralph & Laporta, Gabriel Zorello & Mucci, Luis Filipe & Marrelli, Mauro Toledo, 2022. "Epizootic dynamics of yellow fever in forest fragments: An agent-based model to explore the influence of vector and host parameters," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).
    15. Brinkmann, Katja & Kübler, Daniel & Liehr, Stefan & Buerkert, Andreas, 2021. "Agent-based modelling of the social-ecological nature of poverty traps in southwestern Madagascar," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    16. Neil, Emily & Madsen, Jens Koed & Carrella, Ernesto & Payette, Nicolas & Bailey, Richard, 2020. "Agent-based modelling as a tool for elephant poaching mitigation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 427(C).
    17. Lapp, Maya & Long, Colby, 2022. "A new approach to agent-based models of Community Resource Management based on the analysis of cheating, monitoring, and sanctioning," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
    18. Planque, Benjamin & Aarflot, Johanna M. & Buttay, Lucie & Carroll, JoLynn & Fransner, Filippa & Hansen, Cecilie & Husson, Bérengère & Langangen, Øystein & Lindstrøm, Ulf & Pedersen, Torstein & Primice, 2022. "A standard protocol for describing the evaluation of ecological models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 471(C).
    19. Gawith, David & Hodge, Ian & Morgan, Fraser & Daigneault, Adam, 2020. "Climate change costs more than we think because people adapt less than we assume," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    20. Chudzinska, Magda & Dupont, Yoko L. & Nabe-Nielsen, Jacob & Maia, Kate P. & Henriksen, Marie V. & Rasmussen, Claus & Kissling, W. Daniel & Hagen, Melanie & Trøjelsgaard, Kristian, 2020. "Combining the strengths of agent-based modelling and network statistics to understand animal movement and interactions with resources: example from within-patch foraging decisions of bumblebees," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 430(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:374:y:2018:i:c:p:37-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.