IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v263y2013icp187-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A hierarchical Bayesian model for the ecological status classification of lagoons

Author

Listed:
  • Arima, Serena
  • Basset, Alberto
  • Jona Lasinio, Giovanna
  • Pollice, Alessio
  • Rosati, Ilaria

Abstract

In transitional waters and among Water Framework Directive (WFD) (European Parliament, 2000) quality elements, benthic macroinvertebrates are the most exposed to natural variability patterns characteristic of these ecosystems due to their life cycles and space-use behaviour. Here, we address the ecological status classification issue for Mediterranean and Black Sea lagoons, using benthic macroinvertebrates from a set of 13 reference lagoons. Two main classification approaches have been proposed in literature: the a priori approach, based on standard classification boundaries, and the a posteriori approach, based on classification boundaries set according to linear mixed models. However, the two approaches take into account only partially and at a different extent the natural variability of ecosystem properties, which may lead to inaccuracies of the classification procedure. Moreover, the different proposed multimetric indices are likely to respond differently to different source of stress and natural variability components, adding uncertainty to the classification procedure. We propose a Bayesian hierarchical model in which the multimetric indices are jointly modelled through a multivariate normal mixture, in order to emphasize clusters of ecosystems resulting from the integration of different multimetric indices. Each mixture component is estimated as function of covariates of interest and corresponds to a cluster of sites assumed to be a proxy of a class of ecological status. This assumption has been validated on a set of ecosystems already classified into ecological status classes with standard methods. We apply the model to available data and compare the classification obtained by the proposed model with those given by the a priori and a posteriori approaches, highlighting pros and cons of each method.

Suggested Citation

  • Arima, Serena & Basset, Alberto & Jona Lasinio, Giovanna & Pollice, Alessio & Rosati, Ilaria, 2013. "A hierarchical Bayesian model for the ecological status classification of lagoons," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 263(C), pages 187-195.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:263:y:2013:i:c:p:187-195
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.05.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380013002561
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.05.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sylvia. Richardson & Peter J. Green, 1997. "On Bayesian Analysis of Mixtures with an Unknown Number of Components (with discussion)," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(4), pages 731-792.
    2. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Van Der Linde, 2002. "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 583-639, October.
    3. Matthew Stephens, 2000. "Dealing with label switching in mixture models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(4), pages 795-809.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Park, Byung-Jung & Zhang, Yunlong & Lord, Dominique, 2010. "Bayesian mixture modeling approach to account for heterogeneity in speed data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 662-673, June.
    2. Yuan Fang & Dimitris Karlis & Sanjeena Subedi, 2022. "Infinite Mixtures of Multivariate Normal-Inverse Gaussian Distributions for Clustering of Skewed Data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 39(3), pages 510-552, November.
    3. Komárek, Arnost, 2009. "A new R package for Bayesian estimation of multivariate normal mixtures allowing for selection of the number of components and interval-censored data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 3932-3947, October.
    4. Roy Costilla & Ivy Liu & Richard Arnold & Daniel Fernández, 2019. "Bayesian model-based clustering for longitudinal ordinal data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1015-1038, September.
    5. Cai, Jing-Heng & Song, Xin-Yuan & Lam, Kwok-Hap & Ip, Edward Hak-Sing, 2011. "A mixture of generalized latent variable models for mixed mode and heterogeneous data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(11), pages 2889-2907, November.
    6. Ungolo, Francesco & Kleinow, Torsten & Macdonald, Angus S., 2020. "A hierarchical model for the joint mortality analysis of pension scheme data with missing covariates," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 68-84.
    7. Papastamoulis, Panagiotis, 2018. "Overfitting Bayesian mixtures of factor analyzers with an unknown number of components," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 220-234.
    8. Kozumi, Hideo, 2004. "Posterior analysis of latent competing risk models by parallel tempering," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 441-458, June.
    9. Royce Anders & William Batchelder, 2015. "Cultural Consensus Theory for the Ordinal Data Case," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 151-181, March.
    10. Lu, Xiaosun & Huang, Yangxin & Zhu, Yiliang, 2016. "Finite mixture of nonlinear mixed-effects joint models in the presence of missing and mismeasured covariate, with application to AIDS studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 119-130.
    11. Lubrano, Michel & Ndoye, Abdoul Aziz Junior, 2016. "Income inequality decomposition using a finite mixture of log-normal distributions: A Bayesian approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 830-846.
    12. Kazuhiko Kakamu, 2022. "Bayesian analysis of mixtures of lognormal distribution with an unknown number of components from grouped data," Papers 2210.05115, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    13. Terrance Savitsky & Daniel McCaffrey, 2014. "Bayesian Hierarchical Multivariate Formulation with Factor Analysis for Nested Ordinal Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 275-302, April.
    14. Carnicero, José Antonio & Wiper, Michael Peter, 2008. "A semi-parametric model for circular data based on mixtures of beta distributions," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws081305, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    15. S. Upadhyay & M. Peshwani, 2008. "Posterior analysis of lognormal regression models using the Gibbs sampler," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 59-85, March.
    16. Assaf, A. George & Tsionas, Mike & Oh, Haemoon, 2018. "The time has come: Toward Bayesian SEM estimation in tourism research," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 98-109.
    17. Jia-Chiun Pan & Chih-Min Liu & Hai-Gwo Hwu & Guan-Hua Huang, 2015. "Allocation Variable-Based Probabilistic Algorithm to Deal with Label Switching Problem in Bayesian Mixture Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, October.
    18. Buddhavarapu, Prasad & Scott, James G. & Prozzi, Jorge A., 2016. "Modeling unobserved heterogeneity using finite mixture random parameters for spatially correlated discrete count data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 492-510.
    19. Weber, Anett & Steiner, Winfried J., 2021. "Modeling price response from retail sales: An empirical comparison of models with different representations of heterogeneity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 843-859.
    20. Hui, Francis K.C., 2017. "Model-based simultaneous clustering and ordination of multivariate abundance data in ecology," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-10.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:263:y:2013:i:c:p:187-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.