IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v244y2012icp93-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulating the effects of the southern pine beetle on regional dynamics 60 years into the future

Author

Listed:
  • Costanza, Jennifer K.
  • Hulcr, Jiri
  • Koch, Frank H.
  • Earnhardt, Todd
  • McKerrow, Alexa J.
  • Dunn, Rob R.
  • Collazo, Jaime A.

Abstract

We developed a spatially explicit model that simulated future southern pine beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis, SPB) dynamics and pine forest management for a real landscape over 60 years to inform regional forest management. The SPB has a considerable effect on forest dynamics in the Southeastern United States, especially in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) stands that are managed for timber production. Regional outbreaks of SPB occur in bursts resulting in elimination of entire stands and major economic loss. These outbreaks are often interspersed with decades of inactivity, making long-term modeling of SPB dynamics challenging. Forest management techniques, including thinning, have proven effective and are often recommended as a way to prevent SPB attack, yet the robustness of current management practices to long-term SPB dynamics has not been examined. We used data from previously documented SPB infestations and forest inventory data to model four scenarios of SPB dynamics and pine forest management. We incorporated two levels of beetle pressure: a background low level, and a higher level in which SPB had the potential to spread among pine stands. For each level of beetle pressure, we modeled two scenarios of forest management: one assuming forests would be managed continuously via thinning, and one with a reduction in thinning. For our study area in Georgia, Florida, and Alabama, we found that beetle pressure and forest management both influenced the landscape effects of SPB. Under increased SPB pressure, even with continuous management, the area of pine forests affected across the region was six times greater than under baseline SPB levels. However, under high SPB pressure, continuous management decreased the area affected by nearly half compared with reduced management. By incorporating a range of forest and SPB dynamics over long time scales, our results extend previous modeling studies, and inform forest managers and policy-makers about the potential future effects of SPB. Our model can also be used to investigate the effects of additional scenarios on SPB dynamics, such as alternative management or climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Costanza, Jennifer K. & Hulcr, Jiri & Koch, Frank H. & Earnhardt, Todd & McKerrow, Alexa J. & Dunn, Rob R. & Collazo, Jaime A., 2012. "Simulating the effects of the southern pine beetle on regional dynamics 60 years into the future," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 244(C), pages 93-103.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:244:y:2012:i:c:p:93-103
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.06.037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380012003407
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.06.037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Provencher, Louis & Forbis, Tara A. & Frid, Leonardo & Medlyn, Gary, 2007. "Comparing alternative management strategies of fire, grazing, and weed control using spatial modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 209(2), pages 249-263.
    2. Price, James I. & McCollum, Daniel W. & Berrens, Robert P., 2010. "Insect infestation and residential property values: A hedonic analysis of the mountain pine beetle epidemic," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(6), pages 415-422, July.
    3. W. A. Kurz & C. C. Dymond & G. Stinson & G. J. Rampley & E. T. Neilson & A. L. Carroll & T. Ebata & L. Safranyik, 2008. "Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 452(7190), pages 987-990, April.
    4. Strand, Eva K. & Vierling, Lee A. & Bunting, Stephen C., 2009. "A spatially explicit model to predict future landscape composition of aspen woodlands under various management scenarios," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 175-191.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roessiger, Joerg & Griess, Verena C. & Härtl, Fabian & Clasen, Christian & Knoke, Thomas, 2013. "How economic performance of a stand increases due to decreased failure risk associated with the admixing of species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 255(C), pages 58-69.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosenberger, Randall S. & Bell, Lauren A. & Champ, Patricia A. & White, Eric M., 2013. "Estimating the Economic Value of Recreation Losses in Rocky Mountain National Park Due to a Mountain Pine Beetle Outbreak," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9.
    2. Brian Petersen & Diana Stuart, 2014. "Explanations of a Changing Landscape: A Critical Examination of the British Columbia Bark Beetle Epidemic," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(3), pages 598-613, March.
    3. Metsaranta, J.M. & Kurz, W.A., 2012. "Inter-annual variability of ecosystem production in boreal jack pine forests (1975–2004) estimated from tree-ring data using CBM-CFS3," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 111-123.
    4. Fahse, Lorenz & Heurich, Marco, 2011. "Simulation and analysis of outbreaks of bark beetle infestations and their management at the stand level," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(11), pages 1833-1846.
    5. Coops, Nicholas C. & Waring, Richard H., 2011. "Estimating the vulnerability of fifteen tree species under changing climate in Northwest North America," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(13), pages 2119-2129.
    6. Xie, Yalin & Lei, Xiangdong & Shi, Jingning, 2020. "Impacts of climate change on biological rotation of Larix olgensis plantations for timber production and carbon storage in northeast China using the 3-PGmix model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 435(C).
    7. Sohngen, Brent & Tian, Xiaohui, 2016. "Global climate change impacts on forests and markets," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 18-26.
    8. Erickson, Adam & Nitschke, Craig & Coops, Nicholas & Cumming, Steven & Stenhouse, Gordon, 2015. "Past-century decline in forest regeneration potential across a latitudinal and elevational gradient in Canada," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 94-102.
    9. Prabath Nishantha Edirisinghe, "undated". "Are All Shifting Cultivators poor? Evidence from Sri Lanka's Dry zones," Working papers 113, The South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics.
    10. Imtiaz Rangwala & James Miller, 2012. "Climate change in mountains: a review of elevation-dependent warming and its possible causes," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 527-547, October.
    11. Vladislav Soukhovolsky & Anton Kovalev & Yulia Ivanova & Olga Tarasova, 2023. "Autoregression, First Order Phase Transition, and Stochastic Resonance: A Comparison of Three Models for Forest Insect Outbreaks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Brady P. Horn & Aakrit Joshi & Johanna Catherine Maclean, 2019. "Substance Use Disorder Treatment Centers and Property Values," NBER Working Papers 25427, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Anna Jönsson & Susanne Harding & Paal Krokene & Holger Lange & Åke Lindelöw & Bjørn Økland & Hans Ravn & Leif Schroeder, 2011. "Modelling the potential impact of global warming on Ips typographus voltinism and reproductive diapause," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 109(3), pages 695-718, December.
    14. Siriwardena, Shyamani D. & Boyle, Kevin J. & Holmes, Thomas P. & Wiseman, P. Eric, 2016. "The implicit value of tree cover in the U.S.: A meta-analysis of hedonic property value studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 68-76.
    15. Zhen Xu & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2013. "Living with Wildfire: The Impact of Historic Fires on Property Values in Kelowna, BC," Working Papers 2013-05, University of Victoria, Department of Economics, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group.
    16. Zhiyuan Xiang & Meifang Zhao & U. S. Ogbodo, 2020. "Accumulation of Urban Insect Pests in China: 50 Years’ Observations on Camphor Tree ( Cinnamomum camphora )," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    17. Jean-Sébastien Landry & Navin Ramankutty, 2015. "Carbon Cycling, Climate Regulation, and Disturbances in Canadian Forests: Scientific Principles for Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-36, January.
    18. Price, Jessica & Silbernagel, Janet & Miller, Nicholas & Swaty, Randy & White, Mark & Nixon, Kristina, 2012. "Eliciting expert knowledge to inform landscape modeling of conservation scenarios," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 76-87.
    19. Swanepoel, G.D. & Hadrich, Joleen & Goemans, Christopher, 2015. "Estimating the Contribution of Groundwater Irrigation to Farmland Values in Phillips County, Colorado," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2015, pages 1-14.
    20. Chubaty, Alex M. & Roitberg, Bernard D. & Li, Chao, 2009. "A dynamic host selection model for mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(9), pages 1241-1250.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:244:y:2012:i:c:p:93-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.