IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v216y2008i3p316-322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to evaluate models: Observed vs. predicted or predicted vs. observed?

Author

Listed:
  • Piñeiro, Gervasio
  • Perelman, Susana
  • Guerschman, Juan P.
  • Paruelo, José M.

Abstract

A common and simple approach to evaluate models is to regress predicted vs. observed values (or vice versa) and compare slope and intercept parameters against the 1:1 line. However, based on a review of the literature it seems to be no consensus on which variable (predicted or observed) should be placed in each axis. Although some researchers think that it is identical, probably because r2 is the same for both regressions, the intercept and the slope of each regression differ and, in turn, may change the result of the model evaluation. We present mathematical evidence showing that the regression of predicted (in the y-axis) vs. observed data (in the x-axis) (PO) to evaluate models is incorrect and should lead to an erroneous estimate of the slope and intercept. In other words, a spurious effect is added to the regression parameters when regressing PO values and comparing them against the 1:1 line. Observed (in the y-axis) vs. predicted (in the x-axis) (OP) regressions should be used instead. We also show in an example from the literature that both approaches produce significantly different results that may change the conclusions of the model evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Piñeiro, Gervasio & Perelman, Susana & Guerschman, Juan P. & Paruelo, José M., 2008. "How to evaluate models: Observed vs. predicted or predicted vs. observed?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 216(3), pages 316-322.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:216:y:2008:i:3:p:316-322
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.05.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380008002305
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.05.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mitchell, P. L., 1997. "Misuse of regression for empirical validation of models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 313-326, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alagarswamy, G. & Singh, P. & Hoogenboom, G. & Wani, S. P. & Pathak, P. & Virmani, S. M., 2000. "Evaluation and application of the CROPGRO-Soybean simulation model in a Vertic Inceptisol," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 19-32, January.
    2. J. Sales, 2009. "The error associated with the prediction of digestible protein contents of fish diets from tabulated values," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(11), pages 498-509.
    3. O'Neal, Monte R. & Frankenberger, Jane R. & Ess, Daniel R., 2002. "Use of CERES-Maize to study effect of spatial precipitation variability on yield," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 205-225, August.
    4. Wan, Liqiang & Zhang, Baisen & Kemp, Peter & Li, Xianglin, 2009. "Modelling the abundance of three key plant species in New Zealand hill-pasture using a decision tree approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(15), pages 1819-1825.
    5. Martin Schönhart & Erwin Schmid & Uwe A. Schneider, 2009. "CropRota – A Model to Generate Optimal Crop Rotations from Observed Land Use," Working Papers 452009, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    6. Qiongfang Li & John Gowing, 2005. "A Daily Water Balance Modelling Approach for Simulating Performance of Tank-Based Irrigation Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 19(3), pages 211-231, June.
    7. Bouman, B.A.M. & van Laar, H.H., 2006. "Description and evaluation of the rice growth model ORYZA2000 under nitrogen-limited conditions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 249-273, March.
    8. Correndo, Adrian A. & Hefley, Trevor J. & Holzworth, Dean P. & Ciampitti, Ignacio A., 2021. "Revisiting linear regression to test agreement in continuous predicted-observed datasets," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    9. M. Sezer & S. Tarhan, 2005. "Model parameters of growth curves of three meat-type lines of Japanese quail," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 50(1), pages 22-30.
    10. Tedeschi, Luis Orlindo, 2006. "Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 89(2-3), pages 225-247, September.
    11. Schönhart, Martin & Schmid, Erwin & Schneider, Uwe A., 2009. "CropRota – A Model to Generate Optimal Crop Rotations from Observed Land Use," Discussion Papers DP-45-2009, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    12. Zhang, Baisen & Valentine, Ian & Kemp, Peter & Lambert, Greg, 2006. "Predictive modelling of hill-pasture productivity: integration of a decision tree and a geographical information system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 1-17, January.
    13. McCall, D. G. & Bishop-Hurley, G. J., 2003. "A pasture growth model for use in a whole-farm dairy production model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 1183-1205, June.
    14. Tedeschi, Luis Orlindo & Fox, Danny G. & Guiroy, Pablo J., 2004. "A decision support system to improve individual cattle management. 1. A mechanistic, dynamic model for animal growth," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 171-204, February.
    15. Bockstaller, C. & Girardin, P., 2003. "How to validate environmental indicators," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 639-653, May.
    16. repec:zbw:inwedp:452009 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Şükrü İmre & Fatih Canıtez & Dilay Çelebi, 2021. "The Socio-Technical Transition to Electric Vehicle Mobility in Turkey: A Multi-Level Perspective," International Journal of Operations Research and Information Systems (IJORIS), IGI Global, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:216:y:2008:i:3:p:316-322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.