IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolet/v233y2023ics0165176523004299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monopsony power and workers’ switching costs: Evidence from hospitals in China

Author

Listed:
  • Luan, Mengna
  • Tao, Zhigang
  • Yuan, Hongjie

Abstract

Using a Chinese hospital-level data set from 2007 to 2018, we measure the monopsony power of hospitals over health care workers by estimating the labor supply elasticity with a hospital-specific labor demand instrument constructed from the number of emergency department visits. The two-stage least squares estimation results show that hospitals have market power over their employees with an implied labor supply elasticity of 1.14, which implies that the wage accounts for only 53% of the marginal revenue product of labor, significantly below the competitive level. More importantly, we find that hospitals’ monopsony power decreases when physicians have the freedom to practice at other hospitals while retaining their positions in their primary hospitals (multi-sited practice policy). Overall, we find that workers’ cost of switching away from employers explains the degree of monopsony power of employers over workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Luan, Mengna & Tao, Zhigang & Yuan, Hongjie, 2023. "Monopsony power and workers’ switching costs: Evidence from hospitals in China," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:233:y:2023:i:c:s0165176523004299
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176523004299
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111403?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Labor monopsony power; Employee switching costs; Hospitals;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • J42 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Monopsony; Segmented Labor Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:233:y:2023:i:c:s0165176523004299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.