IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v26y1996i2p111-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Contingent Valuation to Determine Australian Tourists' Values for Forest Conservation in Vanuatu

Author

Listed:
  • Flatley, G. W.

    (University College, University of New South Wales)

  • Bennett, J. W.

    (University College, University of New South Wales)

Abstract

Pressure from developed nations for forest areas in developing countries to be set aside from logging is indicative of an international demand for forest conservation. In this study, the Contingent Valuation Method is used to estimate the value that Australian tourists place on the conservation of two rainforest areas in the Republic of Vanuatu. The study found that Australian visitors to Vanuatu would be willing to pay around $403 000 per annum to protect the rainforest sites, and that such a value was sufficient to cover the costs of lease agreements to ensure the exclusion of logging activities from these areas. This information is useful to the Government of Vanuatu, both in deciding the future use of the areas under consideration and in the development of an institutional structure to provide for the conservation option. The application of the Contingent Valuation Method in the context of estimating the value of a non-marketed environmental benefit in a developing country, provides useful lessons for future applications of the technique.

Suggested Citation

  • Flatley, G. W. & Bennett, J. W., 1996. "Using Contingent Valuation to Determine Australian Tourists' Values for Forest Conservation in Vanuatu," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 111-127, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:26:y:1996:i:2:p:111-127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592696500160
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mogas Amorós, Joan, 2016. "What are the social benefits of carbon sequestration?," Working Papers 2072/261536, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    2. Rolfe, John & Bennett, Jeff & Louviere, Jordan, 2000. "Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 289-302, November.
    3. Sonja S. Teelucksingh & Paulo A.L.D. Nunes, 2010. "Biodiversity Valuation in Developing Countries: A Focus on Small Island Developing States (SIDS)," Working Papers 2010.111, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    4. George Halkos & Aikaterini Leonti & Eleni Sardianou, 2020. "Assessing the Preservation of Parks and Natural Protected Areas: A Review of Contingent Valuation Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-24, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Conservation; Forest;

    JEL classification:

    • L83 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Sports; Gambling; Restaurants; Recreation; Tourism
    • Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:26:y:1996:i:2:p:111-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.