IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v147y2023ics0190740923000518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-designing a dynamic tool to enhance participation for young people: A participatory design project with young service users and social workers

Author

Listed:
  • Bromark, Kristina
  • Knutsson, Ola
  • Spånberger Weitz, Ylva

Abstract

There is an emphasis on user participation in social work. The arguments derive from both a democratic and a consumerist approach, aiming on the one hand to equalize power between users and professionals, and on the other hand, for more efficient and legitimized services. However, research shows that there is a lack of knowledge about methods and conditions for realizing user participation in social services. In this exploratory study, grounded in participatory design, a set of four workshops took place, enabling young people, social workers and researchers to participate in the design process. The data were analysed with affinity analysis, a technique whereby the data are sorted with “I” labels, to stay close to the material. Also, written feedback and reflections from participants as well as oral feedback and reflections were generated, documented and integrated with the affinity analysis. The main findings concern how the participatory approach revealed tensions between the participants’ different perspectives on user participation, which in turn contributed to the shaping of a dynamic tool. The findings imply that the tool needed to be both “fair and square” to ensure equality for all young people, and dynamic and flexible to meet the uniqueness of each young person. Moreover, the tool needed to be both rich and contextualized to meet the need for information and participation throughout the transition process, and simple and accessible to meet the acute nature of many transitions as well as the overall time constraints within social work practice. The research process reached the level of contribution, with involvement in some but not all stages labelled as collaboration. The wide range of expertise involved in the design process provides a good basis for the tool to be able to address the need for increased user participation in social work practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Bromark, Kristina & Knutsson, Ola & Spånberger Weitz, Ylva, 2023. "Co-designing a dynamic tool to enhance participation for young people: A participatory design project with young service users and social workers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:147:y:2023:i:c:s0190740923000518
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740923000518
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106856?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bessell, Sharon, 2011. "Participation in decision-making in out-of-home care in Australia: What do young people say?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 496-501, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berit Skauge & Anita Skårstad Storhaug & Edgar Marthinsen, 2021. "The What, Why and How of Child Participation—A Review of the Conceptualization of “Child Participation” in Child Welfare," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Elizabeth Fernandez, 2014. "Child Protection and Vulnerable Families: Trends and Issues in the Australian Context," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Gazit, Matan & Perry-Hazan, Lotem, 2020. "Disadvantaged youth’s participation in collective decision making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    4. Goh, Esther C.L. & Baruch, Herzl, 2018. "Young persons as epistemological agents in social work assessment and intervention," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 88-95.
    5. Hatlelid Føleide, Marie, 2021. "Three conversation practices illuminating how children’s views and wishes are explored in care proceedings: An analysis of 22 children’s spokespersons’ accounts," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    6. Hambrick, Erin P. & Oppenheim-Weller, Shani & N'zi, Amanda M. & Taussig, Heather N., 2016. "Mental health interventions for children in foster care: A systematic review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 65-77.
    7. Ivana Borić & Andrea Ćosić & Iva Prskalo, 2021. "Experiences of Adolescent Participation in Educational Institutions in Croatia," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Burger, Kaspar, 2017. "The role of social and psychological resources in children's perception of their participation rights," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 139-147.
    9. van Bijleveld, G.G. & Dedding, C.W.M. & Bunders-Aelen, J.F.G., 2014. "Seeing eye to eye or not? Young people's and child protection workers' perspectives on children's participation within the Dutch child protection and welfare services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(P3), pages 253-259.
    10. Strömpl, Judit & Luhamaa, Katre, 2020. "Child participation in child welfare removals through the looking glass: Estonian children’s and professionals’ perspectives compared," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    11. Havlicek, Judy & Curry, Ashley & Villalpando, Fabiola, 2018. "Youth participation in foster youth advisory boards: Perspectives of facilitators," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 255-270.
    12. Abdullah, Alhassan & Cudjoe, Ebenezer & Manful, Esmeranda, 2018. "Barriers to childcare in Children's Homes in Ghana: Caregivers' solutions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 450-456.
    13. Vis, Svein Arild & Fossum, Sturla, 2013. "Representation of children's views in court hearings about custody and parental visitations — A comparison between what children wanted and what the courts ruled," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 2101-2109.
    14. Angela A. Quaye & Imelda Coyne & Maja Söderbäck & Inger Kristensson Hallström, 2019. "Children's active participation in decision‐making processes during hospitalisation: An observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4525-4537, December.
    15. Keddell, Emily, 2023. "Recognising the embedded child in child protection: Children’s participation, inequalities and cultural capital," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    16. Paulsen, Veronika & Berg, Berit, 2016. "Social support and interdependency in transition to adulthood from child welfare services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 125-131.
    17. Havlicek, Judy & Lin, Ching-Hsuan & Braun, Michael T., 2016. "Cultivating youth voice through participation in a Foster youth advisory board: Perspectives of facilitators," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1-10.
    18. Manful, Esmeranda & Cudjoe, Ebenezer & Abdullah, Alhassan, 2020. "Towards child-inclusive practices in child protection in Ghana: Perspectives from parents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    19. Cudjoe, Ebenezer & Uggerhøj, Lars & Abdullah, Alhassan, 2020. "“We are consultants, not collaborators”: Young people’s experiences with child protection meetings in Ghana," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    20. Smales, Madelaine & Savaglio, Melissa & Webster, Susan & Skouteris, Helen & Pizzirani, Bengianni & O'Donnell, Renee & Green (nee Cox), Rachael, 2020. "Are the voices of young people living in out-of-home care represented in research examining their health?: A systematic review of the literature," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:147:y:2023:i:c:s0190740923000518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.