IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v143y2022ics0190740922002997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using a realist lens to understand the Victorian Family Preservation and Reunification Response in the first year of implementation — Towards a better understanding of practice

Author

Listed:
  • Morris, Heather
  • Blewitt, Claire
  • Savaglio, Melissa
  • Halfpenny, Nick
  • Carolan, Erin
  • Miller, Robyn
  • Skouteris, Helen

Abstract

Programs for families where children are at risk aim to develop the conditions for safety and care that is rewarding, loving, stable and secure. Understanding what leads to outcomes is less clear, and realist research methods are a useful in unpacking this. The Social Care Theorising Model informed the collection of focus group data from practitioners and team leaders in a family preservation and reunification program being scale up across the state of Victoria in Australia. Demi-regularities (patterns of a program’s function that are reasonably stable) were generated to provide a rapid understanding of practice knowledge to inform data-driven decision making. This study combined the methodology from two studies to balance the need for realist informed findings without time and resource intensive processes of program theory development. Twelve demi-regularities were found which were grouped into three socio-ecological themes of family, organisation and system. At the family level, practitioners described what enabled engagement, readiness, the development of a therapeutic relationship and the need for supported closure. The organisational level suggested the preconditions to engagement, the caseload needed to work intensively, management of staff stress and work needed to operationalise goals. The systems level largely described the essential role of the Child Protection Navigator and how they enable service delivery. This study provides an understanding of what works, for whom, when and why in an innovative family preservation and reunification program.

Suggested Citation

  • Morris, Heather & Blewitt, Claire & Savaglio, Melissa & Halfpenny, Nick & Carolan, Erin & Miller, Robyn & Skouteris, Helen, 2022. "Using a realist lens to understand the Victorian Family Preservation and Reunification Response in the first year of implementation — Towards a better understanding of practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:143:y:2022:i:c:s0190740922002997
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740922002997
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106663?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sadegh Eshaghnia & James J. Heckman & Rasmus Landersø & Rafeh Qureshi, 2022. "Intergenerational Transmission of Family Influence," NBER Working Papers 30412, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Yaming Yang & Shuanming Li, 2022. "On a Family of Log-Gamma-Generated Archimedean Copulas," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 123-142, January.
    3. Ingrid Tyler & Judith Lynam & Patricia O’Campo & Heather Manson & Meghan Lynch & Behnoosh Dashti & Nicole Turner & Andrea Feller & Elizabeth Lee Ford-Jones & Sue Makin & Christine Loock, 2019. "It takes a village: a realist synthesis of social pediatrics program," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(5), pages 691-701, June.
    4. Ronald Anderson & Nan Li & David M. Reeb & Masud Karim, 2022. "The Family Firm Ownership Puzzle," Review of Corporate Finance, now publishers, vol. 2(4), pages 679-720, December.
    5. Heather Morris & Melissa Savaglio & Nick Halfpenny & Renee O’Donnell & Alesia Pileggi & Andrea Dunbar & Robyn Miller & Helen Skouteris, 2021. "MacKillop Family Services’ Family Preservation and Reunification Response for Vulnerable Families—Protocol for an Effectiveness-Implementation Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dasgupta, Kabir & Diegmann, André & Kirchmaier, Tom & Plum, Alexander, 2022. "The gender reveal: The effect of sons on young fathers’ criminal behavior and labor market activities," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Eshaghnia, Sadegh S. M. & Heckman, James J. & Landerso, Rasmus, 2023. "Maximum Impact Intergenerational Associations," IZA Discussion Papers 16038, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Lorna Stabler & Maura MacPhee & Benjamin Collins & Simon Carroll & Karen Davison & Vidhi Thakkar & Esme Fuller-Thomson & Shen (Lamson) Lin & Brandon Hey, 2021. "A Rapid Realist Review of Effective Mental Health Interventions for Individuals with Chronic Physical Health Conditions during the COVID-19 Pandemic Using a Systems-Level Mental Health Promotion Frame," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Sadegh Eshaghnia & James J. Heckman & Rasmus Landersø, 2023. "The Impact of the Level and Timing of Parental Resources on Child Development and Intergenerational Mobility," NBER Working Papers 31093, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Alison Jayne Gerlach & Alysha McFadden, 2022. "Re-Envisioning an Early Years System of Care towards Equity in Canada: A Critical, Rapid Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Alice Rossi & Tom Vanacker & Silvio Vismara, 2023. "Unsuccessful Equity Crowdfunding Offerings and the Persistence in Equity Fundraising of Family Business Start-Ups," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(4), pages 1327-1355, July.
    7. Eshaghnia, Sadegh S. M. & Heckman, James J. & Landerso, Rasmus & Qureshi, Rafeh, 2022. "Intergenerational Transmission of Family Influence," IZA Discussion Papers 15504, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Clarke, Damian & Bustos, Nicolás Lillo & Tapia-­Schythe, Kathya, 2022. "Estimating Inter-Generational Returns to Medical Care: New Evidence from At­-Risk Newborns," IZA Discussion Papers 15593, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Eshaghnia, Sadegh S. M. & Heckman, James J. & Razavi, Goya, 2023. "Pricing Neighborhoods," IZA Discussion Papers 16234, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:143:y:2022:i:c:s0190740922002997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.