IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v138y2022ics0190740922001670.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Short-stayers” in child welfare: Characteristics and system experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Getz, Zoe
  • Simmel, Cassandra
  • Zhang, Liwei
  • Greenfield, Brett

Abstract

This exploratory study examined the characteristics of children who had relatively brief experiences in out-of-home (OOH) child welfare placements (i.e., involved in OOH placements for 30 days or less) to better understand the demographic composition of this group as well as their child welfare system experiences leading up to and following these brief placements. This study provides a broad picture of this “short-stayer” population, using national child welfare administrative data (Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System {AFCARS}) from Fiscal Year 2018. In comparing short-stayers with those who had longer spells in child welfare (from 30 days up to five years or more), the final sample for the analyses was 251,112 children. The percentage of children nationwide who fell into the short or very short-stayer category, was close to 10%. Several key findings emerged, differentiating short-stayers from children with longer stays in OOH care, based on several demographic and risk characteristics, as well as on their prior recent history of involvement with child welfare. Moreover, the short-stayer population was more likely to reside in more restrictive settings while in these brief placements. The implications for placing children into OOH care for such brief periods of time are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Getz, Zoe & Simmel, Cassandra & Zhang, Liwei & Greenfield, Brett, 2022. "“Short-stayers” in child welfare: Characteristics and system experiences," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:138:y:2022:i:c:s0190740922001670
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106531
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740922001670
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106531?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mitchell, Monique B. & Kuczynski, Leon, 2010. "Does anyone know what is going on? Examining children's lived experience of the transition into foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 437-444, March.
    2. Shipe, Stacey L. & Shaw, Terry V. & Betsinger, Sara & Farrell, Jill L., 2017. "Expanding the conceptualization of re-entry: The inter-play between child welfare and juvenile services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 256-262.
    3. Kuntara Pukthuanthong & Saif Ullah & Thomas J. Walker & Xuan Wu, 2017. "Timely vs. delayed CEO turnover," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 469-479, June.
    4. Becker, Marion A. & Jordan, Neil & Larsen, Rebecca, 2007. "Predictors of successful permanency planning and length of stay in foster care: The role of race, diagnosis and place of residence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 1102-1113, August.
    5. Jedwab, Merav & Shaw, Terry V., 2017. "Predictors of reentry into the foster care system: Comparison of children with and without previous removal experience," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 177-184.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hébert, Sophie T. & Esposito, Tonino & Hélie, Sonia, 2018. "How short-term placements affect placement trajectories: A propensity-weighted analysis of re-entry into care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 117-124.
    2. Davidson, Ryan D. & Tomlinson, Claire S. & Beck, Connie J. & Bowen, Anne M., 2019. "The revolving door of families in the child welfare system: Risk and protective factors associated with families returning," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 468-479.
    3. Diana N. Teixeira & Isabel Narciso & Margarida R. Henriques, 2022. "Driving for Success in Family Reunification—Professionals’ Views on Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Wulczyn, Fred & Parolini, Arno & Schmits, Florie & Magruder, Joseph & Webster, Daniel, 2020. "Returning to foster care: Age and other risk factors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    5. Baker, Amy J.L. & Creegan, Alyssa & Quinones, Alexa & Rozelle, Laura, 2016. "Foster children's views of their birth parents: A review of the literature," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 177-183.
    6. Welch, Vicki & Jones, Christine & Stalker, Kirsten & Stewart, Alasdair, 2015. "Permanence for disabled children and young people through foster care and adoption: A selective review of international literature," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 137-146.
    7. Aguiniga, Donna M. & Madden, Elissa E. & Hawley, Alicia, 2015. "Exploratory analysis of child protection mediation permanency placement outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 20-27.
    8. Nesmith, Ande, 2017. "Coping with change: Using the Bridge's Transitions Framework with foster youth," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 41-47.
    9. Sukruth Suresh & T. Ravichandran, 2022. "Value Gains in Business Process Outsourcing: The Vendor Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 677-690, April.
    10. Akin, Becci A., 2011. "Predictors of foster care exits to permanency: A competing risks analysis of reunification, guardianship, and adoption," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 999-1011, June.
    11. Colarossi, Lisa & Dean, Randa & Stevens, Alex & Ackeifi, Jackie & Noonan, Maya, 2019. "Sexual and reproductive health capacity building for foster care organizations: A systems model," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Leloux-Opmeer, Harmke & Kuiper, Chris H.Z. & Swaab, Hanna T. & Scholte, Evert M., 2017. "Children referred to foster care, family-style group care, and residential care: (How) do they differ?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-9.
    13. Goemans, Anouk & Vanderfaeillie, Johan & Damen, Harm & Pijnenburg, Huub & Van Holen, Frank, 2016. "Reunification of foster children: Factors associated with reunification outcomes in Flanders and the Netherlands," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 284-292.
    14. Jedwab, Merav & Shaw, Terry V., 2017. "Predictors of reentry into the foster care system: Comparison of children with and without previous removal experience," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 177-184.
    15. Haight, Wendy & Marshall, Jane & Woolman, Joanna, 2015. "The Child Protection Clinic: A mixed method evaluation of parent legal representation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 7-17.
    16. Fischer, Sierra & Harris, Elizabeth & Smith, Hailey S. & Polivka, Rachel J., 2020. "Family visit coaching: Improvement in parenting skills through coached visitation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    17. Konijn, Carolien & Admiraal, Sabine & Baart, Josefiene & van Rooij, Floor & Stams, Geert-Jan & Colonnesi, Cristina & Lindauer, Ramón & Assink, Mark, 2019. "Foster care placement instability: A meta-analytic review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 483-499.
    18. Douglas Cumming & Sofia Johan & Denis Schweizer, 2017. "Information systems, agency problems, and fraud," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 421-424, June.
    19. Stephens, Tricia & Kuerbis, Alexis & Pisciotta, Caterina & Morgenstern, Jon, 2020. "Underexamined points of vulnerability for black mothers in the child welfare system: The role of number of births, age of first use of substances and criminal justice involvement," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    20. Xu, Yanfeng & Man, Xiaoou & Zhang, Lixia & DeForge, Bruce, 2020. "Family foster care and children’s outcomes in China: Evidence from a scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:138:y:2022:i:c:s0190740922001670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.