IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v95y2016icp109-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On quadratic logistic regression models when predictor variables are subject to measurement error

Author

Listed:
  • Stoklosa, Jakub
  • Huang, Yih-Huei
  • Furlan, Elise
  • Hwang, Wen-Han

Abstract

Owing to its good properties and a simple model fitting procedure, logistic regression is one of the most commonly used methods applied to data consisting of binary outcomes and one or more predictor variables. However, if the predictor variables are measured with error and the functional relationship between the response and predictor variables is non-linear (e.g., quadratic) then consistent estimation of model parameters is more challenging to develop. To address the effects of measurement error in predictor variables when using quadratic logistic regression models, two novel approaches are developed: (1) an approximated refined regression calibration; and (2) a weighted corrected score method. Both proposed approaches offer several advantages over existing methods in that they are computationally efficient and are straightforward to implement. A simulation study was conducted to evaluate the estimators’ finite sample performance. The proposed methods are also applied on real data from a medical study and an ecological application.

Suggested Citation

  • Stoklosa, Jakub & Huang, Yih-Huei & Furlan, Elise & Hwang, Wen-Han, 2016. "On quadratic logistic regression models when predictor variables are subject to measurement error," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 109-121.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:95:y:2016:i:c:p:109-121
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2015.09.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016794731500239X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2015.09.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jakub Stoklosa & Wen-Han Hwang & Sheng-Hai Wu & Richard Huggins, 2011. "Heterogeneous Capture–Recapture Models with Covariates: A Partial Likelihood Approach for Closed Populations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1659-1665, December.
    2. Wen-Han Hwang & Steve Y. H. Huang, 2003. "Estimation in Capture-Recapture Models When Covariates Are Subject to Measurement Errors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 1113-1122, December.
    3. Anastasios A. Tsiatis & Yanyuan Ma, 2004. "Locally efficient semiparametric estimators for functional measurement error models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 91(4), pages 835-848, December.
    4. Yih-Huei Huang & Chi-Chung Wen & Yu-Hua Hsu, 2015. "The Extensively Corrected Score for Measurement Error Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(4), pages 911-924, December.
    5. Austin, Mike, 2007. "Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 1-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard Huggins & Jakub Stoklosa & Cameron Roach & Paul Yip, 2018. "Estimating the size of an open population using sparse capture–recapture data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 280-288, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen-Han Hwang & Jakub Stoklosa & Ching-Yun Wang, 2022. "Population Size Estimation Using Zero-Truncated Poisson Regression with Measurement Error," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(2), pages 303-320, June.
    2. Yang Liu & Yukun Liu & Pengfei Li & Lin Zhu, 2021. "Maximum likelihood abundance estimation from capture‐recapture data when covariates are missing at random," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 1050-1060, September.
    3. Paul S. F. Yip & Hua-Zhen Lin & Liqun Xi, 2005. "A Semiparametric Method for Estimating Population Size for Capture–Recapture Experiments with Random Covariates in Continuous Time," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 1085-1092, December.
    4. Václavík, Tomáš & Meentemeyer, Ross K., 2009. "Invasive species distribution modeling (iSDM): Are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3248-3258.
    5. Yanyuan Ma & Marc G. Genton, 2010. "Explicit estimating equations for semiparametric generalized linear latent variable models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(4), pages 475-495, September.
    6. Muñoz-Mas, Rafael & Vezza, Paolo & Alcaraz-Hernández, Juan Diego & Martínez-Capel, Francisco, 2016. "Risk of invasion predicted with support vector machines: A case study on northern pike (Esox Lucius, L.) and bleak (Alburnus alburnus, L.)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 123-134.
    7. Meineri, Eric & Dahlberg, C. Johan & Hylander, Kristoffer, 2015. "Using Gaussian Bayesian Networks to disentangle direct and indirect associations between landscape physiography, environmental variables and species distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 127-136.
    8. Marmion, Mathieu & Luoto, Miska & Heikkinen, Risto K. & Thuiller, Wilfried, 2009. "The performance of state-of-the-art modelling techniques depends on geographical distribution of species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(24), pages 3512-3520.
    9. Kaiping Wang & Weiqi Wang & Niyi Zha & Yue Feng & Chenlan Qiu & Yunlu Zhang & Jia Ma & Rui Zhang, 2022. "Spatially Heterogeneity Response of Critical Ecosystem Service Capacity to Address Regional Development Risks to Rapid Urbanization: The Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Li, Mengyan & Ma, Yanyuan & Li, Runze, 2019. "Semiparametric regression for measurement error model with heteroscedastic error," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 320-338.
    11. Sellami, Mohamed Habib & Sifaoui, Mohamed Salah, 2008. "Modelling of heat and mass transfer inside a traditional oasis: Experimental validation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 144-154.
    12. Fei Jiang & Sebastien Haneuse, 2017. "A Semi-parametric Transformation Frailty Model for Semi-competing Risks Survival Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(1), pages 112-129, March.
    13. Di Traglia, Mario & Attorre, Fabio & Francesconi, Fabio & Valenti, Roberto & Vitale, Marcello, 2011. "Is cellular automata algorithm able to predict the future dynamical shifts of tree species in Italy under climate change scenarios? A methodological approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(4), pages 925-934.
    14. Mouton, Ans M. & De Baets, Bernard & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2010. "Ecological relevance of performance criteria for species distribution models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(16), pages 1995-2002.
    15. Aertsen, Wim & Kint, Vincent & van Orshoven, Jos & Özkan, Kürşad & Muys, Bart, 2010. "Comparison and ranking of different modelling techniques for prediction of site index in Mediterranean mountain forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(8), pages 1119-1130.
    16. Lyndsie S Wszola & Victoria L Simonsen & Erica F Stuber & Caitlyn R Gillespie & Lindsey N Messinger & Karie L Decker & Jeffrey J Lusk & Christopher F Jorgensen & Andrew A Bishop & Joseph J Fontaine, 2017. "Translating statistical species-habitat models to interactive decision support tools," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Basille, Mathieu & Calenge, Clément & Marboutin, Éric & Andersen, Reidar & Gaillard, Jean-Michel, 2008. "Assessing habitat selection using multivariate statistics: Some refinements of the ecological-niche factor analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 233-240.
    18. Rufino, Marta M. & Albouy, Camille & Brind'Amour, Anik, 2021. "Which spatial interpolators I should use? A case study applying to marine species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 449(C).
    19. Mouton, Ans M. & De Baets, Bernard & Van Broekhoven, Ester & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2009. "Prevalence-adjusted optimisation of fuzzy models for species distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(15), pages 1776-1786.
    20. Paola Berchialla & Veronica Sciannameo & Sara Urru & Corrado Lanera & Danila Azzolina & Dario Gregori & Ileana Baldi, 2021. "Adjustment for Baseline Covariates to Increase Efficiency in RCTs with Binary Endpoint: A Comparison of Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-9, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:95:y:2016:i:c:p:109-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.