IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v221y2010i16p1995-2002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological relevance of performance criteria for species distribution models

Author

Listed:
  • Mouton, Ans M.
  • De Baets, Bernard
  • Goethals, Peter L.M.

Abstract

Species distribution models have often been developed based on ecological data. To develop reliable data-driven models, however, a sound model training and evaluation procedures are needed. A crucial step in these procedures is the assessment of the model performance, with as key component the applied performance criterion. Therefore, we reviewed seven performance criteria commonly applied in presence–absence modelling (the correctly classified instances, Kappa, sensitivity, specificity, the normalised mutual information statistic, the true skill statistic and the odds ratio) and analysed their application in both the model training and evaluation process. Although estimates of predictive performance have been used widely to assess final model quality, a systematic overview was missing because most analyses of performance criteria have been empirical and only focused on specific aspects of the performance criteria. This paper provides such an overview showing that different performance criteria evaluate a model differently and that this difference may be explained by the dependency of these criteria on the prevalence of the validation set. We showed theoretically that these prevalence effects only occur if the data are inseparable by an n-dimensional hyperplane, n being the number of input variables. Given this inseparability, different performance criteria focus on different aspects of model performance during model training, such as sensitivity, specificity or predictive accuracy. These findings have important consequences for ecological modelling because ecological data are mostly inseparable due to data noise and the complexity of the studied system. Consequently, it should be very clear which aspect of the model performance is evaluated, and models should be evaluated consistently, that is, independent of, or taking into account, species prevalence. The practical implications of these findings are clear. They provide further insight into the evaluation of ecological presence/absence models and attempt to assist modellers in their choice of suitable performance criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Mouton, Ans M. & De Baets, Bernard & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2010. "Ecological relevance of performance criteria for species distribution models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(16), pages 1995-2002.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:221:y:2010:i:16:p:1995-2002
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.04.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380010002334
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.04.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mouton, Ans M. & Schneider, Matthias & Peter, Armin & Holzer, Georg & Müller, Rudolf & Goethals, Peter L.M. & De Pauw, Niels, 2008. "Optimisation of a fuzzy physical habitat model for spawning European grayling (Thymallus thymallus L.) in the Aare river (Thun, Switzerland)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 122-132.
    2. Mouton, Ans M. & De Baets, Bernard & Van Broekhoven, Ester & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2009. "Prevalence-adjusted optimisation of fuzzy models for species distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(15), pages 1776-1786.
    3. repec:asg:wpaper:1015 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Prates-Clark, Cássia Da Conceição & Saatchi, Sassan S. & Agosti, Donat, 2008. "Predicting geographical distribution models of high-value timber trees in the Amazon Basin using remotely sensed data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 309-323.
    5. Chefaoui, Rosa M. & Lobo, Jorge M., 2008. "Assessing the effects of pseudo-absences on predictive distribution model performance," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(4), pages 478-486.
    6. Václavík, Tomáš & Meentemeyer, Ross K., 2009. "Invasive species distribution modeling (iSDM): Are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3248-3258.
    7. Austin, Mike, 2007. "Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 1-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcot, Bruce G., 2012. "Metrics for evaluating performance and uncertainty of Bayesian network models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 50-62.
    2. Szymon Hoffman, 2021. "Estimation of Prediction Error in Regression Air Quality Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, November.
    3. An Cao & Xueyi Shi, 2022. "The Effects of Climate Change on Habitat Connectivity: A Case Study of the Brown-Eared Pheasant in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Mouton, A.M. & Dillen, A. & Van den Neucker, T. & Buysse, D. & Stevens, M. & Coeck, J., 2012. "Impact of sampling efficiency on the performance of data-driven fish habitat models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 94-102.
    5. Muñoz-Mas, Rafael & Marcos-Garcia, Patricia & Lopez-Nicolas, Antonio & Martínez-García, Francisco J. & Pulido-Velazquez, Manuel & Martínez-Capel, Francisco, 2018. "Combining literature-based and data-driven fuzzy models to predict brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) spawning habitat degradation induced by climate change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 386(C), pages 98-114.
    6. Ahmad Rajabi & Saeid Shabanlou & Fariborz Yosefvand & Afshin Kiani, 2021. "Exploring the sample size and replications scenarios effect on spatial prediction of flood, using MARS and MaxEnt methods case study: saliantape catchment, Golestan, Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(1), pages 871-901, October.
    7. Holguin-Gonzalez, Javier E. & Boets, Pieter & Alvarado, Andres & Cisneros, Felipe & Carrasco, María C. & Wyseure, Guido & Nopens, Ingmar & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2013. "Integrating hydraulic, physicochemical and ecological models to assess the effectiveness of water quality management strategies for the River Cuenca in Ecuador," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 254(C), pages 1-14.
    8. Schlaepfer, Daniel R. & Lauenroth, William K. & Bradford, John B., 2014. "Modeling regeneration responses of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) to abiotic conditions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 286(C), pages 66-77.
    9. Fukuda, Shinji & De Baets, Bernard & Mouton, Ans M. & Waegeman, Willem & Nakajima, Jun & Mukai, Takahiko & Hiramatsu, Kazuaki & Onikura, Norio, 2011. "Effect of model formulation on the optimization of a genetic Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy system for fish habitat suitability evaluation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1401-1413.
    10. Choi, Jong-Kuk & Oh, Hyun-Joo & Koo, Bon Joo & Ryu, Joo-Hyung & Lee, Saro, 2011. "Crustacean habitat potential mapping in a tidal flat using remote sensing and GIS," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1522-1533.
    11. Muñoz-Mas, R. & Martínez-Capel, F. & Alcaraz-Hernández, J.D. & Mouton, A.M., 2015. "Can multilayer perceptron ensembles model the ecological niche of freshwater fish species?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 309, pages 72-81.
    12. Caldow, Chris & Monaco, Mark E. & Pittman, Simon J. & Kendall, Matthew S. & Goedeke, Theresa L. & Menza, Charles & Kinlan, Brian P. & Costa, Bryan M., 2015. "Biogeographic assessments: A framework for information synthesis in marine spatial planning," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 423-432.
    13. Gobeyn, Sacha & Mouton, Ans M. & Cord, Anna F. & Kaim, Andrea & Volk, Martin & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2019. "Evolutionary algorithms for species distribution modelling: A review in the context of machine learning," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 392(C), pages 179-195.
    14. Domisch, Sami & Kuemmerlen, Mathias & Jähnig, Sonja C. & Haase, Peter, 2013. "Choice of study area and predictors affect habitat suitability projections, but not the performance of species distribution models of stream biota," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 257(C), pages 1-10.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yi, Yujun & Cheng, Xi & Yang, Zhifeng & Wieprecht, Silke & Zhang, Shanghong & Wu, Yingjie, 2017. "Evaluating the ecological influence of hydraulic projects: A review of aquatic habitat suitability models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 748-762.
    2. Václavík, Tomáš & Meentemeyer, Ross K., 2009. "Invasive species distribution modeling (iSDM): Are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3248-3258.
    3. Mouton, Ans M. & De Baets, Bernard & Van Broekhoven, Ester & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2009. "Prevalence-adjusted optimisation of fuzzy models for species distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(15), pages 1776-1786.
    4. Mouton, A.M. & Dillen, A. & Van den Neucker, T. & Buysse, D. & Stevens, M. & Coeck, J., 2012. "Impact of sampling efficiency on the performance of data-driven fish habitat models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 94-102.
    5. Santiago José Elías Velazco & Franklin Galvão & Fabricio Villalobos & Paulo De Marco Júnior, 2017. "Using worldwide edaphic data to model plant species niches: An assessment at a continental extent," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, October.
    6. Stokland, Jogeir N. & Halvorsen, Rune & Støa, Bente, 2011. "Species distribution modelling—Effect of design and sample size of pseudo-absence observations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(11), pages 1800-1809.
    7. Muñoz-Mas, Rafael & Marcos-Garcia, Patricia & Lopez-Nicolas, Antonio & Martínez-García, Francisco J. & Pulido-Velazquez, Manuel & Martínez-Capel, Francisco, 2018. "Combining literature-based and data-driven fuzzy models to predict brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) spawning habitat degradation induced by climate change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 386(C), pages 98-114.
    8. Fukuda, Shinji & De Baets, Bernard & Mouton, Ans M. & Waegeman, Willem & Nakajima, Jun & Mukai, Takahiko & Hiramatsu, Kazuaki & Onikura, Norio, 2011. "Effect of model formulation on the optimization of a genetic Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy system for fish habitat suitability evaluation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1401-1413.
    9. Robinson, Todd P. & van Klinken, Rieks D. & Metternicht, Graciela, 2010. "Comparison of alternative strategies for invasive species distribution modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(19), pages 2261-2269.
    10. Gobeyn, Sacha & Mouton, Ans M. & Cord, Anna F. & Kaim, Andrea & Volk, Martin & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2019. "Evolutionary algorithms for species distribution modelling: A review in the context of machine learning," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 392(C), pages 179-195.
    11. Muñoz-Mas, Rafael & Vezza, Paolo & Alcaraz-Hernández, Juan Diego & Martínez-Capel, Francisco, 2016. "Risk of invasion predicted with support vector machines: A case study on northern pike (Esox Lucius, L.) and bleak (Alburnus alburnus, L.)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 123-134.
    12. Iturbide, Maialen & Bedia, Joaquín & Herrera, Sixto & del Hierro, Oscar & Pinto, Miriam & Gutiérrez, Jose Manuel, 2015. "A framework for species distribution modelling with improved pseudo-absence generation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 166-174.
    13. Meineri, Eric & Dahlberg, C. Johan & Hylander, Kristoffer, 2015. "Using Gaussian Bayesian Networks to disentangle direct and indirect associations between landscape physiography, environmental variables and species distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 127-136.
    14. Marmion, Mathieu & Luoto, Miska & Heikkinen, Risto K. & Thuiller, Wilfried, 2009. "The performance of state-of-the-art modelling techniques depends on geographical distribution of species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(24), pages 3512-3520.
    15. Kaiping Wang & Weiqi Wang & Niyi Zha & Yue Feng & Chenlan Qiu & Yunlu Zhang & Jia Ma & Rui Zhang, 2022. "Spatially Heterogeneity Response of Critical Ecosystem Service Capacity to Address Regional Development Risks to Rapid Urbanization: The Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Doko, Tomoko & Fukui, Hiromichi & Kooiman, Andre & Toxopeus, A.G. & Ichinose, Tomohiro & Chen, Wenbo & Skidmore, A.K., 2011. "Identifying habitat patches and potential ecological corridors for remnant Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus japonicus) populations in Japan," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 748-761.
    17. Sellami, Mohamed Habib & Sifaoui, Mohamed Salah, 2008. "Modelling of heat and mass transfer inside a traditional oasis: Experimental validation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 144-154.
    18. Di Traglia, Mario & Attorre, Fabio & Francesconi, Fabio & Valenti, Roberto & Vitale, Marcello, 2011. "Is cellular automata algorithm able to predict the future dynamical shifts of tree species in Italy under climate change scenarios? A methodological approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(4), pages 925-934.
    19. Jiang, Dong & Wang, Qian & Ding, Fangyu & Fu, Jingying & Hao, Mengmeng, 2019. "Potential marginal land resources of cassava worldwide: A data-driven analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 167-173.
    20. Aertsen, Wim & Kint, Vincent & van Orshoven, Jos & Özkan, Kürşad & Muys, Bart, 2010. "Comparison and ranking of different modelling techniques for prediction of site index in Mediterranean mountain forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(8), pages 1119-1130.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:221:y:2010:i:16:p:1995-2002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.