IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v138y2019icp143-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient inference for nonlinear state space models: An automatic sample size selection rule

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng, Jing
  • Chan, Ngai Hang

Abstract

This paper studies the maximum likelihood estimation of nonlinear state space models. Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo method is introduced to implement the Monte Carlo expectation maximization algorithm for more accurate and robust estimation. Under this framework, an automated sample size selection criterion is constructed via renewal theory. This criterion would increase the sample size when the relative likelihood indicates that the parameters are close to each other. The proposed methodology is applied to the stochastic volatility model and another nonlinear state space model for illustration, where the results show better estimation performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng, Jing & Chan, Ngai Hang, 2019. "Efficient inference for nonlinear state space models: An automatic sample size selection rule," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 143-154.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:138:y:2019:i:c:p:143-154
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2019.03.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947319300775
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2019.03.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Godsill, Simon J. & Doucet, Arnaud & West, Mike, 2004. "Monte Carlo Smoothing for Nonlinear Time Series," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 156-168, January.
    2. Jeongeun Kim & David S. Stoffer, 2008. "Fitting Stochastic Volatility Models in the Presence of Irregular Sampling via Particle Methods and the EM Algorithm," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 811-833, September.
    3. Christophe Andrieu & Arnaud Doucet & Roman Holenstein, 2010. "Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo methods," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(3), pages 269-342, June.
    4. J. G. Booth & J. P. Hobert, 1999. "Maximizing generalized linear mixed model likelihoods with an automated Monte Carlo EM algorithm," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(1), pages 265-285.
    5. Drew Creal, 2012. "A Survey of Sequential Monte Carlo Methods for Economics and Finance," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 245-296.
    6. Pitt, Michael K. & Silva, Ralph dos Santos & Giordani, Paolo & Kohn, Robert, 2012. "On some properties of Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation methods based on the particle filter," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 134-151.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elmar Mertens & James M. Nason, 2020. "Inflation and professional forecast dynamics: An evaluation of stickiness, persistence, and volatility," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(4), pages 1485-1520, November.
    2. Bournakis, Ioannis & Tsionas, Mike G., 2023. "A Non-Parametric Estimation of Productivity with Idiosyncratic and Aggregate Shocks: The Role of Research and Development (R&D) and Corporate Tax," MPRA Paper 118100, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. James M. Nason & Gregor W. Smith, 2021. "Measuring the slowly evolving trend in US inflation with professional forecasts," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(1), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Scharth, Marcel & Kohn, Robert, 2016. "Particle efficient importance sampling," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 190(1), pages 133-147.
    5. Herbst, Edward & Schorfheide, Frank, 2019. "Tempered particle filtering," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 26-44.
    6. Manthos D. Delis & Pantelis Kazakis & Constantin Zopounidis, 2021. "Management Practices and Takeover Decisions," Working Papers 2021_10, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    7. Fredrik Lindsten & Randal Douc & Eric Moulines, 2015. "Uniform Ergodicity of the Particle Gibbs Sampler," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(3), pages 775-797, September.
    8. Kim, Jaeho, 2015. "Bayesian Inference in a Non-linear/Non-Gaussian Switching State Space Model: Regime-dependent Leverage Effect in the U.S. Stock Market," MPRA Paper 67153, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Tsionas, Mike G., 2020. "On a model of environmental performance and technology gaps," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 1141-1152.
    10. Gareth W. Peters & Rodrigo S. Targino & Mario V. Wüthrich, 2017. "Bayesian Modelling, Monte Carlo Sampling and Capital Allocation of Insurance Risks," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-51, September.
    11. Mike G. Tsionas & Nicholas Apergis, 2023. "Another look at contagion across United States and European financial markets: Evidence from the credit default swaps markets," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 1137-1155, January.
    12. Emmanuel C. Mamatzakis & Steven Ongena & Mike G. Tsionas, 2023. "The response of household debt to COVID-19 using a neural networks VAR in OECD," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 65-91, July.
    13. Tsionas, Mike G., 2022. "Convex non-parametric least squares, causal structures and productivity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 370-387.
    14. Delis, Manthos D. & Kazakis, Pantelis & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2023. "Management and takeover decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(3), pages 1256-1268.
    15. Patrick Leung & Catherine S. Forbes & Gael M Martin & Brendan McCabe, 2019. "Forecasting Observables with Particle Filters: Any Filter Will Do!," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 22/19, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    16. Fernández-Villaverde, J. & Rubio-Ramírez, J.F. & Schorfheide, F., 2016. "Solution and Estimation Methods for DSGE Models," Handbook of Macroeconomics, in: J. B. Taylor & Harald Uhlig (ed.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 527-724, Elsevier.
    17. Matti Vihola & Jouni Helske & Jordan Franks, 2020. "Importance sampling type estimators based on approximate marginal Markov chain Monte Carlo," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1339-1376, December.
    18. Pratiti Chatterjee & David Gunawan & Robert Kohn, 2020. "The Interaction Between Credit Constraints and Uncertainty Shocks," Papers 2004.14719, arXiv.org.
    19. Deschamps, P., 2015. "Alternative Formulation of the Leverage Effect in a Stochastic Volatility Model with Asymmetric Heavy-Tailed Errors," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2015020, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    20. Creal, Drew D. & Tsay, Ruey S., 2015. "High dimensional dynamic stochastic copula models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 189(2), pages 335-345.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:138:y:2019:i:c:p:143-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.