IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v317y2022ics0306261922005207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and comparative selection of surrogate models using artificial neural network for an integrated regenerative transcritical cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yili
  • Bryan, Jacob
  • Richards, Geordie
  • Wang, Hailei

Abstract

Surrogate models are becoming increasingly important in replacing the computationally-expensive physics-based simulation models in many applications, such as system optimization, sensitivity analysis and design space exploration. As one of the fastest-growing field, machine learning, specifically artificial neural networks (ANN) have been adapted to model various energy systems. In the present study, five ANN-based surrogate models are developed in replacing the physics-based model of a novel regenerative transcritical power cycle using methanol as the working fluid that is integrated with a small modular reactor. The input layer of the surrogate models consists of the seven design parameters of the cycle, and the output layer returns the 1st-law efficiency, levelized cost of energy and penalty. The evaluation results show that all five candidate surrogate models have demonstrated high R2 score, low relative absolute errors (RAE) and low L1 losses, with the separate multi-layer feed-forward (MLF) neural network model outperforming the others. Once coupled with global optimization, the surrogate model is expected to find the optimal design parameters in order to minimize levelized cost of energy (LCOE) and penalty value in the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yili & Bryan, Jacob & Richards, Geordie & Wang, Hailei, 2022. "Development and comparative selection of surrogate models using artificial neural network for an integrated regenerative transcritical cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:317:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922005207
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922005207
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119146?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Jiangfeng & Sun, Zhixin & Dai, Yiping & Ma, Shaolin, 2010. "Parametric optimization design for supercritical CO2 power cycle using genetic algorithm and artificial neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 1317-1324, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Guizao & Wu, Guangning & Yang, Zefeng & Chen, Xing & Wei, Wenfu, 2023. "Development of surrogate models for evaluating energy transfer quality of high-speed railway pantograph-catenary system using physics-based model and machine learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shengjun, Zhang & Huaixin, Wang & Tao, Guo, 2011. "Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2740-2754, August.
    2. Hu, Bin & Li, Yaoyu & Cao, Feng & Xing, Ziwen, 2015. "Extremum seeking control of COP optimization for air-source transcritical CO2 heat pump water heater system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 361-372.
    3. Guo, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Design analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide recuperator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 21-27.
    4. Li, Tailu & Fu, Wencheng & Zhu, Jialing, 2014. "An integrated optimization for organic Rankine cycle based on entransy theory and thermodynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 561-573.
    5. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2017. "Integration between supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: A review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 819-836.
    6. Kun-Hsien Lu & Hsiao-Wei D. Chiang & Pei-Jen Wang, 2022. "Sensitivity Analysis of Transcritical CO 2 Cycle Performance Regarding Isentropic Efficiencies of Turbomachinery for Low Temperature Heat Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Mondal, Subha & De, Sudipta, 2015. "Transcritical CO2 power cycle – Effects of regenerative heating using turbine bleed gas at intermediate pressure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 95-103.
    8. Suresh, M.V.J.J. & Reddy, K.S. & Kolar, Ajit Kumar, 2011. "ANN-GA based optimization of a high ash coal-fired supercritical power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4867-4873.
    9. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2012. "Exergy analysis and parameter study on a novel auto-cascade Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 539-547.
    10. Lakew, Amlaku Abie & Bolland, Olav & Ladam, Yves, 2011. "Theoretical thermodynamic analysis of Rankine power cycle with thermal driven pump," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(9), pages 3005-3011.
    11. Son, Seongmin & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2018. "Application of adjoint sensitivity analysis method to supercritical CO2 power cycle optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1153-1164.
    12. Fallah, M. & Mohammadi, Z. & Mahmoudi, S.M. Seyed, 2022. "Advanced exergy analysis of the combined S–CO2/ORC system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    13. Battisti, Felipe G. & Delsoto, Giovanni S. & da Silva, Alexandre K., 2018. "Transient analysis and optimization of a recuperative sCO2 Brayton cycle assisted by heat and mass storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 979-991.
    14. Wang, Xurong & Dai, Yiping, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis of utilizing the transcritical CO2 cycle and the ORC for a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 193-207.
    15. Padilla, Ricardo Vasquez & Soo Too, Yen Chean & Benito, Regano & Stein, Wes, 2015. "Exergetic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated with solar central receivers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 348-365.
    16. Chen, Huijuan & Yogi Goswami, D. & Rahman, Muhammad M. & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2011. "Energetic and exergetic analysis of CO2- and R32-based transcritical Rankine cycles for low-grade heat conversion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2802-2808, August.
    17. Shi, Lingfeng & Shu, Gequn & Tian, Hua & Huang, Guangdai & Li, Xiaoya & Chen, Tianyu & Li, Ligeng, 2018. "Experimental investigation of a CO2-based Transcritical Rankine Cycle (CTRC) for exhaust gas recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1149-1159.
    18. Cem Öksel & Ali Koç, 2022. "Modeling of a Combined Kalina and Organic Rankine Cycle System for Waste Heat Recovery from Biogas Engine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    19. Baik, Young-Jin & Kim, Minsung & Chang, Ki Chang & Kim, Sung Jin, 2011. "Power-based performance comparison between carbon dioxide and R125 transcritical cycles for a low-grade heat source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 892-898, March.
    20. Song, Jian & Li, Xue-song & Ren, Xiao-dong & Gu, Chun-wei, 2018. "Performance analysis and parametric optimization of supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2) cycle with bottoming Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 406-416.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:317:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922005207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.