IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v217y2019icp255-264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why does spatial extrapolation of the vine water status make sense? Insights from a modelling approach

Author

Listed:
  • Roux, Sébastien
  • Gaudin, Rémi
  • Tisseyre, Bruno

Abstract

This work is devoted to precision agriculture and more precisely to the spatial monitoring of water status in viticulture. An empirical approach was introduced in 2008 based on the extrapolation across a domain (vineyard block, vineyard, region) of vine water status observations from a reference site using a simple statistical model, called SPIDER, and proved efficient in many studies. Once the extrapolation model is calibrated, this approach leads to a concentration of measurements for one site only (reference site) while providing an estimate of the grapevine water status at a larger spatial scale. It is a promising hybrid approach based both on regular (but targeted) measurements and on modelling. However, so far only empirical guidelines for its practical use have been provided. Moreover, the limits of validity (spatial, temporal, etc.) of such an approach are not known. This work intends to use a mechanistic model based on grapevine water balance modelling to study to what extent a simulated water status can be spatially extrapolated at the field scale. The water balance model was calibrated on two datasets (different cultivars and weather data) and used to analyse the performances of SPIDER. The results confirmed the relevance of the empirical approach (SPIDER) based on water status spatial extrapolation with a low error level on the two datasets studied. The use of the water balance model also helped define the validity domain of SPIDER: it confirmed the importance of having dominantly dry conditions and revealed the possibility of recovering good prediction quality after strong rainfall or irrigation. This study globally demonstrates the relevance of spatial extrapolation of the vine water status from a reference site with a linear regression model and provides new insights on the properties of the predictions for application in viticulture either at the within-field level or at larger scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Roux, Sébastien & Gaudin, Rémi & Tisseyre, Bruno, 2019. "Why does spatial extrapolation of the vine water status make sense? Insights from a modelling approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 255-264.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:217:y:2019:i:c:p:255-264
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377418309223
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Celette, Florian & Ripoche, Aude & Gary, Christian, 2010. "WaLIS--A simple model to simulate water partitioning in a crop association: The example of an intercropped vineyard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(11), pages 1749-1759, November.
    2. Gaudin, Rémi & Roux, Sébastien & Tisseyre, Bruno, 2017. "Linking the transpirable soil water content of a vineyard to predawn leaf water potential measurements," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 13-23.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramos, M.C., 2017. "Effects of compost amendment on the available soil water and grape yield in vineyards planted after land levelling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 67-76.
    2. Wang, Zikui & Wu, Yuhuan & Cao, Quan & Shen, Yuying & Zhang, Baoqing, 2021. "Modeling the coupling processes of evapotranspiration and soil water balance in agroforestry systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    3. Gaudin, Rémi & Roux, Sébastien & Tisseyre, Bruno, 2017. "Linking the transpirable soil water content of a vineyard to predawn leaf water potential measurements," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 13-23.
    4. López-Vicente, Manuel & Álvarez, Sara, 2018. "Stability and patterns of topsoil water content in rainfed vineyards, olive groves, and cereal fields under different soil and tillage conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 167-176.
    5. Knowling, Matthew J. & Bennett, Bree & Ostendorf, Bertram & Westra, Seth & Walker, Rob R. & Pellegrino, Anne & Edwards, Everard J. & Collins, Cassandra & Pagay, Vinay & Grigg, Dylan, 2021. "Bridging the gap between data and decisions: A review of process-based models for viticulture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    6. Naulleau, Audrey & Gary, Christian & Prévot, Laurent & Vinatier, Fabrice & Hossard, Laure, 2022. "How can winegrowers adapt to climate change? A participatory modeling approach in southern France," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    7. Strack, Timo & Stoll, Manfred, 2022. "Soil water dynamics and drought stress response of Vitis vinifera L. in steep slope vineyard systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    8. Cancela, J.J. & Fandiño, M. & Rey, B.J. & Martínez, E.M., 2015. "Automatic irrigation system based on dual crop coefficient, soil and plant water status for Vitis vinifera (cv Godello and cv Mencía)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 52-63.
    9. Pasquel, Daniel & Cammarano, Davide & Roux, Sébastien & Castrignanò, Annamaria & Tisseyre, Bruno & Rinaldi, Michele & Troccoli, Antonio & Taylor, James A., 2023. "Downscaling the APSIM crop model for simulation at the within-field scale," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:217:y:2019:i:c:p:255-264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.