IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v184y2020ics0308521x19315525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the uncertainty in nitrogen application and groundwater nitrate leaching in manure based cropping systems

Author

Listed:
  • Miller, Christine M.F.
  • Waterhouse, Hannah
  • Harter, Thomas
  • Fadel, James G.
  • Meyer, Deanne

Abstract

Uncertainty in application rates of nitrogen (N) limits the effectiveness of nutrient management plans that aim to realize yield goals while minimizing environmental N losses. Measuring N application rates accurately is especially difficult in manure dependent cropping systems. California dairies use both solid manure and process wastewater (PWW) to fertilize forage crop fields. California dairy farmers measure the ratio of N applied to N removed from each crop field, the N Ratio, based on many uncertain measurements of the quantity and concentration of applied N sources. In this study, a Monte Carlo based model was used to propagate the uncertainty of each application measurement to the overall N application rate. Then the Monte Carlo model was used to stochastically vary the N application rate around farmer measured values for two forage fields (A: silty clay soil, B: sandy loam soil) over a 5 year period. The N Ratios and groundwater nitrate concentrations were simulated for 1000 stochastic N application scenarios using the HYDRUS-1D water and solute transport model and the results were compared to monitoring well measurements. Results showed that uncertainty in measurements of N applied in PWW were the dominant source of uncertainty in total N application rates, contributing 64 to 94% of overall uncertainty. N Ratio uncertainty varied widely between harvests. The average upper and lower limits of the 95% confidence interval deviated from the median simulated N Ratio by 0.25 (range: 0.13 to 0.48) and 0.27 (range: 0.12 to 0.55), respectively, among all harvested crops. Simulated groundwater nitrate concentrations were lower than monitoring well measurements by an average of 20 and 2 mg L−1 for Fields A and B, respectively. All simulated and observed nitrate concentrations in groundwater recharge from both fields were three to eight times the federal maximum contaminant level for nitrate as N of 10 mg L−1. Determining and reducing uncertainty in measurements of N applied in PWW is likely the most impactful way to improve accuracy of overall N application rates. Within current measurement and management systems, measurements of N application in manure dependent cropping systems are not accurate enough to identify application rates that will both support yield goals and reduce environmental N losses.

Suggested Citation

  • Miller, Christine M.F. & Waterhouse, Hannah & Harter, Thomas & Fadel, James G. & Meyer, Deanne, 2020. "Quantifying the uncertainty in nitrogen application and groundwater nitrate leaching in manure based cropping systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:184:y:2020:i:c:s0308521x19315525
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X19315525
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102877?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wickham, Hadley, 2007. "Reshaping Data with the reshape Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 21(i12).
    2. Mu, W. & Groen, E.A. & van Middelaar, C.E. & Bokkers, E.A.M. & Hennart, S. & Stilmant, D. & de Boer, I.J.M., 2017. "Benchmarking nutrient use efficiency of dairy farms: The effect of epistemic uncertainty," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 25-33.
    3. David Tilman & Kenneth G. Cassman & Pamela A. Matson & Rosamond Naylor & Stephen Polasky, 2002. "Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices," Nature, Nature, vol. 418(6898), pages 671-677, August.
    4. Wickham, Hadley, 2011. "The Split-Apply-Combine Strategy for Data Analysis," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 40(i01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krevh, Vedran & Filipović, Lana & Petošić, Dragutin & Mustać, Ivan & Bogunović, Igor & Butorac, Jasminka & Kisić, Ivica & Defterdarović, Jasmina & Nakić, Zoran & Kovač, Zoran & Pereira, Paulo & He, Ha, 2023. "Long-term analysis of soil water regime and nitrate dynamics at agricultural experimental site: Field-scale monitoring and numerical modeling using HYDRUS-1D," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    2. Kanthilanka, H. & Ramilan, T. & Farquharson, R.J. & Weerahewa, J., 2023. "Optimal nitrogen fertilizer decisions for rice farming in a cascaded tank system in Sri Lanka: An analysis using an integrated crop, hydro-nutrient and economic model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarlas, Georgios & Páez, Antonio & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "Betweenness-accessibility: Estimating impacts of accessibility on networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Marin FOTACHE & Florin DUMITRU & Valerica GREAVU-SERBAN, 2015. "An Information Systems Master Programme in Romania. Some Commonalities and Specificities," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(3), pages 5-18.
    3. Martijn Van Heel & Dinska Van Gucht & Koen Vanbrabant & Frank Baeyens, 2017. "The Importance of Conditioned Stimuli in Cigarette and E-Cigarette Craving Reduction by E-Cigarettes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Sean McKenzie & Hilary Parkinson & Jane Mangold & Mary Burrows & Selena Ahmed & Fabian Menalled, 2018. "Perceptions, Experiences, and Priorities Supporting Agroecosystem Management Decisions Differ among Agricultural Producers, Consultants, and Researchers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Milad Abbasiharofteh & Tom Broekel, 2021. "Still in the shadow of the wall? The case of the Berlin biotechnology cluster," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(1), pages 73-94, February.
    6. Andee J. Kaplan & Eric R. Hare, 2019. "Putting down roots: a graphical exploration of community attachment," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1449-1464, December.
    7. Paul J McMurdie & Susan Holmes, 2014. "Waste Not, Want Not: Why Rarefying Microbiome Data Is Inadmissible," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
    8. Stefan LINGNER & Eiko THIESSEN & Kerrin MÜLLER & Eberhard HARTUNG, 2018. "Dry Biomass Estimation of Hedge Banks: Allometric Equation vs. Structure from Motion via Unmanned Aerial Vehicle," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(4), pages 149-156.
    9. Wickham, Hadley, 2014. "Tidy Data," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 59(i10).
    10. Cornelius J. König & Clemens B. Fell & Linus Kellnhofer & Gabriel Schui, 2015. "Are there gender differences among researchers from industrial/organizational psychology?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 1931-1952, December.
    11. C. Sean Burns & Charles W. Fox, 2017. "Language and socioeconomics predict geographic variation in peer review outcomes at an ecology journal," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 1113-1127, November.
    12. Martín, Belén & Páez, Antonio, 2019. "Individual and geographic variations in the propensity to travel by active modes in Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 103-113.
    13. Jean Mercenier & Maria Teresa Alvarez Martinez & Andries Brandsma & Francesco Di Comite & Olga Diukanova & d'Artis Kancs & Patrizio Lecca & Montserrat Lopez-Cobo & Philippe Monfort & Damiaan Persyn & , 2016. "RHOMOLO-v2 Model Description: A spatial computable general equilibrium model for EU regions and sectors," JRC Research Reports JRC100011, Joint Research Centre.
    14. Kayla A. Cotterman & Anthony D. Kendall & Bruno Basso & David W. Hyndman, 2018. "Groundwater depletion and climate change: future prospects of crop production in the Central High Plains Aquifer," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 187-200, January.
    15. Chrats Melkonian & Francisco Zorrilla & Inge Kjærbølling & Sonja Blasche & Daniel Machado & Mette Junge & Kim Ib Sørensen & Lene Tranberg Andersen & Kiran R. Patil & Ahmad A. Zeidan, 2023. "Microbial interactions shape cheese flavour formation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Jana S. Dietrich & Ellen A. R. Welti & Peter Haase, 2023. "Extreme climatic events alter the aquatic insect community in a pristine German stream," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(6), pages 1-16, June.
    17. Thiele, Jan C. & Nuske, Robert S. & Ahrends, Bernd & Panferov, Oleg & Albert, Matthias & Staupendahl, Kai & Junghans, Udo & Jansen, Martin & Saborowski, Joachim, 2017. "Climate change impact assessment—A simulation experiment with Norway spruce for a forest district in Central Europe," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 30-47.
    18. Galloway, Craig & Conradie, Beatrice & Prozesky, Heidi & Esler, Karen, 2018. "Opportunities to improve sustainability on commercial pasture-based dairy farms by assessing environmental impact," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-9.
    19. Elisa Morri & Riccardo Santolini, 2021. "Ecosystem Services Valuation for the Sustainable Land Use Management by Nature-Based Solution (NbS) in the Common Agricultural Policy Actions: A Case Study on the Foglia River Basin (Marche Region, It," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Liu, Duan & Tang, Runcheng & Xie, Jun & Tian, Jingjing & Shi, Rui & Zhang, Kai, 2020. "Valuation of ecosystem services of rice–fish coculture systems in Ruyuan County, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:184:y:2020:i:c:s0308521x19315525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.