IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v101y2009i3p186-196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a mathematical model to study the impacts of production and management policies on the herd dynamics and profitability of dairy goats

Author

Listed:
  • Guimarães, Vinícius Pereira
  • Tedeschi, Luis Orlindo
  • Rodrigues, Marcelo Teixeira

Abstract

The reduction in goat milk production and the competitiveness of more profitable activities have increased the adoption of measures to enhance goat milk and meat around the world. A simulation model was built to evaluate the dynamics of a dairy goat herd under different scenarios of production. A System Dynamics approach was used to identify management policies that could affect the behaviour of the herd over 10Â years of simulation using data from a dairy goat herd in Brazil. The impact of reproductive and mortality rates, one or two annual reproductive cycles on production, and economic health of dairy goats on changes in the herd dynamics were evaluated. Simulations indicated that small changes in reproduction and mortality rates and milk price can considerably affect the dynamics of the herd as well as the financial health of the production system. The interferences created to visualize the effects were not immediately realized because of intrinsic delays in the system. The comparison of models with one or two breeding seasons indicated that the latter was considerably more profitable and had a faster turnover. It was also found that the two breeding season had a greater capacity to support reduction in milk price that could generate financial instability in the production system. It was concluded that mathematical models can be used to predict impacts in management policies on herd dynamics and sensitivity to support the dairy goat activity showing its viability as an agricultural activity that can contribute to the production and incomes in small farms.

Suggested Citation

  • Guimarães, Vinícius Pereira & Tedeschi, Luis Orlindo & Rodrigues, Marcelo Teixeira, 2009. "Development of a mathematical model to study the impacts of production and management policies on the herd dynamics and profitability of dairy goats," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 101(3), pages 186-196, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:101:y:2009:i:3:p:186-196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308-521X(09)00066-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bosman, H. G. & Ayantunde, A. A. & Steenstra, F. A. & Udo, H. M. J., 1997. "A simulation model to assess productivity of goat production in the tropics," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 539-576, August.
    2. van Kooten, G. Cornelis & Bulte, Erwin H. & Kinyua, Patrick, 1997. "Game cropping and wildlife conservation in Kenya: A dynamic simulation model with adaptive control," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 439-462, August.
    3. M. Tichit & B. Hubert & L. Doyen & Didier Genin, 2004. "A viability model to assess the sustainability of mixed herds under climatic uncertainty," Post-Print hal-00716790, HAL.
    4. Hallam, David, 1984. "A quantitative framework for livestock development planning: Part 2--The determination of livestock requirements," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 45-59.
    5. van Kooten, G.C. & Bulte, E.H. & Kinyua, P., 1997. "Game cropping and wildlife conservation in Kenya," Other publications TiSEM 068d515f-34a7-4147-a56d-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Loyland, Knut & Ringstad, Vidar, 2000. "Gains and structural effects of exploiting scale-economies in Norwegian dairy production," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 149-166, January.
    7. Angirasa, Aditi K. & Shumway, C. Richard & Cartwright, T. C., 1985. "Simulating differences in net returns from beef production under alternative forage systems and management practices," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 99-116.
    8. Singh, Devindar, 1986. "Simulation of swine herd population dynamics," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 157-183.
    9. Gartner, J. A. & Hallam, D., 1984. "A quantitative framework for livestock development planning: Part 3--Feed demand and supply," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 123-142.
    10. Upton, Martin, 1993. "Livestock productivity assessment and modelling," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 459-472.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Parisa Alizadeh & Hosein Mohammadi & Naser Shahnoushi & Sayed Saghaian & Alireza Pooya, 2020. "Application of System Thinking Approach in Identifying the Challenges of Beef Value Chain," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 12(2), June.
    2. Belanche, Alejandro & Martín-García, A. Ignacio & Fernández-Álvarez, Javier & Pleguezuelos, Javier & Mantecón, Ángel R. & Yáñez-Ruiz, David R., 2019. "Optimizing management of dairy goat farms through individual animal data interpretation: A case study of smart farming in Spain," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 27-38.
    3. Kelechukwu G. Odoemena & Jeffrey P. Walters & Holger Maximilian Kleemann, 2020. "A System Dynamics Model of Supply-Side Issues Influencing Beef Consumption in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baumgärtner, Stefan & Quaas, Martin F., 2009. "Ecological-economic viability as a criterion of strong sustainability under uncertainty," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 2008-2020, May.
    2. Tom Kompas & Tuong Nhu Che, 2004. "Production and Technical Efficiency on Australian Dairy Farms," International and Development Economics Working Papers idec04-1, International and Development Economics.
    3. Groot, Jeroen C.J. & Rossing, Walter a.H. & Tichit, Muriel & Turpin, Nadine & Jellema, André & Baudry, Jacques & Verburg, Peter & Doyen, Luc & van de Ven, Gerrie, 2009. "On the contribution of modelling to multifunctional agriculture: learning from comparisons," MPRA Paper 65467, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Kompas, Tom & Che, Tuong Nhu, 2006. "Technology choice and efficiency on Australian dairy farms," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(1), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Hary, I., 2004. "Derivation of steady state herd productivity using stage-structured population models and mathematical programming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 133-152, August.
    6. Sara Rodríguez & Lluis Plà & Javier Faulin, 2014. "New opportunities in operations research to improve pork supply chain efficiency," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 5-23, August.
    7. Veysset, P. & Bebin, D. & Lherm, M., 2005. "Adaptation to Agenda 2000 (CAP reform) and optimisation of the farming system of French suckler cattle farms in the Charolais area: a model-based study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 179-202, February.
    8. Joly, Frédéric & Sabatier, Rodolphe & Tatin, Laurent & Mosnier, Claire & Ahearn, Ariell & Benoit, Marc & Hubert, Bernard & Deffuant, Guillaume, 2022. "Adaptive decision-making on stocking rates improves the resilience of a livestock system exposed to climate shocks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).
    9. Mdoe, Ntengua & Wiggins, Steve, 1997. "Returns to smallholder dairying in the Kilimanjaro region, Tanzania," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 17(1), pages 75-87, October.
    10. Bouman, B. A. M. & Nieuwenhuyse, A., 1999. "Exploring options for sustainable beef cattle ranching in the humid tropics: a case study for the Atlantic Zone of Costa Rica," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 145-161, February.
    11. Hengsdijk, H. & Bouman, B. A. M. & Nieuwenhuyse, A. & Jansen, H. G. P., 1999. "Quantification of land use systems using technical coefficient generators: a case study for the Northern Atlantic zone of Costa Rica," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 109-121, August.
    12. Sand, Roald, 2002. "The Propensity to Consume Income from Different Sources and Implications for Saving: An Application to Norwegian Farm Households," Workshop on the Farm Household-Firm Unit: Its Importance in Agriculture and Implications for Statistics, April 12-13,2002, Wye Campus, Imperial College 15716, International Agricultural Policy Reform and Adjustment Project (IAPRAP).
    13. Costa, Fernando Paim & Rehman, Tahir, 2005. "Unravelling the rationale of `overgrazing' and stocking rates in the beef production systems of Central Brazil using a bi-criteria compromise programming model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 277-295, March.
    14. Sabatier, R. & Mouysset, L., 2018. "A robustness-based viewpoint on the production-ecology trade-off in agroecosystems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 1-9.
    15. Lesnoff, M., 1999. "Dynamics of a sheep population in a Sahelian area (Ndiagne district in Senegal): a periodic matrix model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 207-221, September.
    16. Béné, C. & Doyen, L., 2008. "Contribution values of biodiversity to ecosystem performances: A viability perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 14-23, December.
    17. Ayalew, W. & Rischkowsky, B. & King, J. M. & Bruns, E., 2003. "Crossbreds did not generate more net benefits than indigenous goats in Ethiopian smallholdings," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 1137-1156, June.
    18. Bosman, H. G. & Moll, H. A. J. & Udo, H. M. J., 1997. "Measuring and interpreting the benefits of goat keeping in tropical farm systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 349-372, April.
    19. Aïchouche Oubraham & Patrick Saint-Pierre & Georges Zaccour, 2020. "Viability of Agroecological Systems under Climatic Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-29, July.
    20. Tichit, M. & Doyen, L. & Lemel, J.Y. & Renault, O. & Durant, D., 2007. "A co-viability model of grazing and bird community management in farmland," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 277-293.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:101:y:2009:i:3:p:186-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.