IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/accfor/v32y2008i2p89-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The determinants of a successful accounting manuscript: Views of the informed

Author

Listed:
  • Brinn, Tony
  • Jones, Michael John

Abstract

Publishing academic articles is a key measure by which the performance of modern academics is judged. However, there is a surprising lack of guidance to authors about which manuscript characteristics influence journal acceptance decisions. This article reports the results of a study into the perceptions of 129 editorial board members of 87 statements relating to the publishability of manuscripts in accounting journals. The respondents indicated certain factors which enhanced the chances of publication (e.g., statistical significance, originality, appropriate statistics and application of theory) and which detracted from publication (e.g., replication, secondary data, polemic pieces, overlapping work and accessibility). Reviewers from the perspective of US journals were more concerned with statistical significance, the use of appropriate statistics, and the generalisability of samples and case studies. There was a high degree of consistency in the results. We found no systematic differences between those adopting critical as opposed to mainstream research.

Suggested Citation

  • Brinn, Tony & Jones, Michael John, 2008. "The determinants of a successful accounting manuscript: Views of the informed," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 89-113.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:accfor:v:32:y:2008:i:2:p:89-113
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2007.12.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0155998207000749
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.accfor.2007.12.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williams, Paul F. & Jenkins, J. Gregory & Ingraham, Laura, 2006. "The winnowing away of behavioral accounting research in the US: The process for anointing academic elites," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 783-818, November.
    2. Apostolos Ballas & Vasilis Theoharakis, 2003. "Exploring Diversity in Accounting through Faculty Journal Perceptions," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 619-644, December.
    3. Whitley, Richard, 1986. "The transformation of business finance into financial economics: The roles of academic expansion and changes in U.S. capital markets," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 171-192, March.
    4. Reiter, Sara Ann & Williams, Paul F., 2002. "The structure and progressivity of accounting research: the crisis in the academy revisited," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 575-607, August.
    5. Tony Tinker, 2006. "Editorial: Accounting journal assessment exercise," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 195-208, September.
    6. Glenn Ellison, 2002. "Evolving Standards for Academic Publishing: A q-r Theory," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 110(5), pages 994-1034, October.
    7. Lowe, Alan & Locke, Joanne, 2005. "Perceptions of journal quality and research paradigm: results of a web-based survey of British accounting academics," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 81-98, January.
    8. Michael John Jones & Roydon Roberts, 2005. "International Publishing Patterns: An Investigation of Leading UK and US Accounting and Finance Journals," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5-6), pages 1107-1140.
    9. Tony Brinn & Michael John Jones, 2008. "The composition of editorial boards in accounting: a UK perspective," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(1), pages 5-35, January.
    10. Tony Brinn & Michael John Jones, 2007. "Editorial boards in accounting: The power and the glory," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 1-25, March.
    11. Brown, Rhoda & Jones, Michael & Steele, Tony, 2007. "Still flickering at the margins of existence? Publishing patterns and themes in accounting and finance research over the last two decades," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 125-151.
    12. Kam C. Chan & Carl R. Chen & Louis T. W. Cheng, 2007. "Global ranking of accounting programmes and the elite effect in accounting research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 47(2), pages 187-220, June.
    13. Michael John Jones & Roydon Roberts, 2005. "International Publishing Patterns: An Investigation of Leading UK and US Accounting and Finance Journals," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5‐6), pages 1107-1140, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zeynep Didem Unutmaz Durmuşoğlu & Alptekin Durmuşoğlu, 2021. "A TOPSIS model for understanding the authors choice of journal selection," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 521-543, January.
    2. João Lunkes Rogério & Ripoll Feliu Vicente M. & Silva Da Rosa Fabricia, 2012. "Pesquisa científica em contabilidade gerencial: estudo comparativo entre Espanha e Brasil," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 57(2), pages 159-184, abril-jun.
    3. Geert Van Campenhout & Tom Van Caneghem, 2010. "Article Contribution and Subsequent Citation Rates: Evidence from European Accounting Review," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 837-855.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lowe, D. Jordan & Van Fleet, David D., 2009. "Scholarly achievement and accounting journal editorial board membership," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 197-209.
    2. Bernard Raffournier & Alain Schatt, 2010. "Is European Accounting Research Fairly Reflected in Academic Journals? An Investigation of Possible Non-mainstream and Language Barrier Biases," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 161-190.
    3. Brown, Rhoda & Jones, Michael, 2015. "Mapping and exploring the topography of contemporary financial accounting research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 237-261.
    4. Maria-Victoria Uribe-Bohorquez & Juan-Camilo Rivera-Ordóñez & Isabel-María García-Sánchez, 2023. "Gender disparities in accounting academia: analysis from the lens of publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(7), pages 3827-3865, July.
    5. Casanueva, Cristóbal & Larrinaga, Carlos, 2013. "The (uncertain) invisible college of Spanish accounting scholars," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 19-31.
    6. Christoph Endenich & Rouven Trapp, 2016. "Cooperation for Publication? An Analysis of Co-authorship Patterns in Leading Accounting Journals," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 613-633, September.
    7. Christian Lohmann & Marc Eulerich, 2017. "Publication trends and the network of publishing institutions in accounting: data on , 1926–2014," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 1-25, January.
    8. Jayne Bisman & Weini Liao, 2009. "Making the mainstream," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(3), pages 180-197, September.
    9. Wilkinson, Brett R. & Durden, Chris H., 2015. "Inducing structural change in academic accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 23-36.
    10. Lina Xu & Steven Dellaportas & Jin Wang, 2022. "A study of interdisciplinary accounting research: analysing the diversity of cited references," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2131-2162, June.
    11. Hussain, Simon, 2010. "Accounting journals and the ABS quality ratings," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 1-16.
    12. Endenich, Christoph & Trapp, Rouven, 2018. "Signaling effects of scholarly profiles – The editorial teams of North American accounting association journals," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 4-23.
    13. Rouven Trapp & Christoph Endenich & Andreas Hoffjan, 2014. "Towards Intellectual Monism? An Institutional Perspective on Management Accounting Research," Working Papers 2014-ACF-04, IESEG School of Management.
    14. Brown, Rhoda & Jones, Michael & Steele, Tony, 2007. "Still flickering at the margins of existence? Publishing patterns and themes in accounting and finance research over the last two decades," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 125-151.
    15. Alan Goodacre & Clive Gaunt & Darren Henry, 2021. "Publication records of Australian accounting and finance faculty promoted to full professor, set within an international context," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(2), pages 3089-3133, June.
    16. Dellaportas, Steven & Xu, Lina & Yang, Zhiqiang, 2022. "The level of cross-disciplinarity in cross-disciplinary accounting research: analysis and suggestions for improvement," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    17. Meyer, Matthias & Waldkirch, Rüdiger W. & Duscher, Irina & Just, Alexander, 2018. "Drivers of citations: An analysis of publications in “top” accounting journals," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 24-46.
    18. Everett, Jeff, 2008. "Editorial proximity equals publication success: A function of rational self-interest or good-faith economy?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(8), pages 1149-1176.
    19. Geert Van Campenhout & Tom Van Caneghem, 2010. "Article Contribution and Subsequent Citation Rates: Evidence from European Accounting Review," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 837-855.
    20. Williams, Paul F. & Jenkins, J. Gregory & Ingraham, Laura, 2006. "The winnowing away of behavioral accounting research in the US: The process for anointing academic elites," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 783-818, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:accfor:v:32:y:2008:i:2:p:89-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/accounting-forum .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.