IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/fseeai/y2016i3p132-139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Issues Regarding Operational Risk Modeling in Banking Units

Author

Listed:
  • Angelica STRATULAT

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Romania)

Abstract

This paper tries to make an important contribution to the subject of the bank management, given that managers are primarily concerned with the procurement of information that allows organizations to successfully fulfill their mission and achieve notable performances.

Suggested Citation

  • Angelica STRATULAT, 2016. "Issues Regarding Operational Risk Modeling in Banking Units," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 132-139.
    • Handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2016:i:3:p:132-139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eia.feaa.ugal.ro/images/eia/2016_3/Stratulat.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Radu Riana Iren & Isai Violeta, 2013. "The Applicability Of The Prudence Principle To Bank Companies In The Vision Of Ias 37," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 179-185.
    2. Marco Moscadelli, 2004. "The modelling of operational risk: experience with the analysis of the data collected by the Basel Committee," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 517, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefan Mittnik & Sandra Paterlini & Tina Yener, 2011. "Operational–risk Dependencies and the Determination of Risk Capital," Center for Economic Research (RECent) 070, University of Modena and Reggio E., Dept. of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    2. Marco Rocco, 2011. "Extreme value theory for finance: a survey," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 99, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    3. Ojo, Marianne, 2007. "The role of the external auditor in bank regulation and supervision: A comparative analysis between the UK, Germany, Italy and the US," MPRA Paper 32614, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jan 2008.
    4. Robert Jarrow & Jeff Oxman & Yildiray Yildirim, 2010. "The cost of operational risk loss insurance," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 273-295, October.
    5. Eckert, Christian & Gatzert, Nadine, 2017. "Modeling operational risk incorporating reputation risk: An integrated analysis for financial firms," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 122-137.
    6. Alina Mihaela Dima, 2009. "Operational Risk Assesement Tools for Quality Management in Banking Services," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(26), pages 364-372, June.
    7. Milan Stehlík & Rastislav Potocký & Helmut Waldl & Zdeněk Fabián, 2010. "On the favorable estimation for fitting heavy tailed data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 485-503, September.
    8. Dominik D. Lambrigger & Pavel V. Shevchenko & Mario V. Wuthrich, 2009. "The Quantification of Operational Risk using Internal Data, Relevant External Data and Expert Opinions," Papers 0904.1361, arXiv.org.
    9. J. Christopher Westland, 2015. "Economics of eBay’s buyer protection plan," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Lucean Mihalcea & Andrei-Mirel Florea, 2016. "REPO Operations - a Way to Adjust Liquidity Crisis on Banking Institutions," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 445-450.
    11. Steven Kou & Xianhua Peng, 2016. "On the Measurement of Economic Tail Risk," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 1056-1072, October.
    12. Robert Jarrow, 2017. "Operational Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: THE ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF RISK MANAGEMENT Theory, Practice, and Applications, chapter 8, pages 69-70, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    13. S�verine Plunus & Georges Hübner & Jean-Philippe Peters, 2012. "Measuring operational risk in financial institutions," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(18), pages 1553-1569, September.
    14. Ikefuji, Masako & Laeven, Roger J.A. & Magnus, Jan R. & Muris, Chris, 2020. "Expected utility and catastrophic risk in a stochastic economy–climate model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 214(1), pages 110-129.
    15. Lu, Zhaoyang, 2011. "Modeling the yearly Value-at-Risk for operational risk in Chinese commercial banks," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 82(4), pages 604-616.
    16. Genest, Christian & Gerber, Hans U. & Goovaerts, Marc J. & Laeven, Roger J.A., 2009. "Editorial to the special issue on modeling and measurement of multivariate risk in insurance and finance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 143-145, April.
    17. Jorge Aníbal Restrepo Morales & Santiago Medina Hurtado, 2012. "Estimation Of Operative Risk For Fraud In The Car Insurance Industry," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(3), pages 73-83.
    18. Giuseppe Galloppo & Alessandro Rogora, 2011. "What Has Worked In Operational Risk?," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(3), pages 1-17.
    19. Pflug Georg Ch. & Schaller Peter, 2009. "A note on pivotal Value-at-Risk estimates," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 27(3), pages 201-209, December.
    20. Di Lascio, F. Marta L. & Giammusso, Davide & Puccetti, Giovanni, 2018. "A clustering approach and a rule of thumb for risk aggregation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 236-248.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2016:i:3:p:132-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.